Portnox CORE Scalability
KN
Kenneth Ndaruga
Network Security Specialist at Equity Bank Limited
I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. It is very scalable. Just depends on the server resources that you have and the license, of course.
View full review »JO
James Olorunosebi
CTO at Solution delivery
It is scalable. We have one client who works with Portnox CORE.
View full review »I would rate the scalability 10 out of 10.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Network Access Control (NAC)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Portnox Security, Forescout, Cisco and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Portnox CORE is very scalable. One Portnox server can support 10,000 endpoints.
View full review »It is very scalable. One virtual machine or virtual server can cover about 10,000 endpoints, which is enough for Serbia.
IS
Principcon67
Consulting Principal at a transportation company with 501-1,000 employees
Whenever we grew, there were no issues with scalability. It is just a question of adding licenses. Currently, we have approximately eight hundred ports, which means eight hundred devices. As the company grows, our usage will continue to grow.
View full review »DM
ChiefSystemEngineer9
Chief System Engineer at a media company with 501-1,000 employees
We don't have any issues with scalability. Whenever we grow, the only question about scalability is determining how many licenses to add and then just adding the licenses. As the company grows and we expand, the usage grows as well.
Right now, we're licensed for about 800 ports. That means that up to 800 devices can be connected. It's easy to add the licenses. It just gets more expensive when you do.
JF
Joke
Security Analyst at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
There has been progress from research and development when requests are made or something unusual is discovered during support.
View full review »UU
Uchechukwu Ukazu
Tech Support at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Of course, it's a scalable solution. One server can support up to 10,000 endpoints and cannot equally be deployed in clusters, where you need more than 10,000.
View full review »I would rate the tool's scalability a seven out of ten since for large environments it needs more intervention.
View full review »JK
Joseph James
Systems & Support Engineer at CWG Plc
The licensing model is based on the number of users. Wireless is based on the number of access points. If I want to scale up, it's very easy. You just buy a new license and additional licenses for the users that you have.
From a scalability point of view, it becomes flexible, in that you can actually buy licenses for exactly the number of users you have, or a range of a number of users that you hope to have. Scalability is fine and doesn't cause any issues.
View full review »BL
Bojan Lepenik
Vodja projektov sistemskih rešitev at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
I haven't really tested the scalability due to the fact that the test was not extended to find out how scalable it is. That said, it's my understanding that it is very scalable. For our purposes and how we will use it, it's fine.
The product seems to be best suited for small to medium-sized organizations.
It can't work fully redundant.
View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Network Access Control (NAC)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Portnox Security, Forescout, Cisco and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.