It is scalable. I would rate the scalability a six out of ten. We have one license.

Because one scan takes six to eight hours, so probably, use it 40 to 50 hours a week.

The solution is easy to scale. Six people are using the solution within my team, and my organization plans to give the license to all the QA testers.

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is not a cloud solution. Since you have to download it to every machine you use, it's not scalable at all. Around seven users use the solution in our organization.

The solution is scalable. There are types of operations we can do and it has good peak performance.

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is a scalable solution. We have about 200 users in our company.

It is a scalable solution but needs to be more user-friendly. I rate the scalability an eight out of ten.

I rate the scalability of the solution as six out of ten.

The solution can scale. It's per system. If you are using it on 100 systems, you must install it on all 100 systems. It's not like you install a central product, and you scale. It's not the client-server architecture; you must install it on every system if you want to test.

We have two or three users on the solution.

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is scalable. You can add in-scope items, and remove any items that are not on the scope.

We have approximately 30 people using the solution in my organization. We have managers, consultants, and senior consultants using it. If our testers increase the number of users will increase and then we will increase our usage of this solution.

Around 500 to 600 users are using the solution in our organization.

It is a scalable solution. We currently have only one to two people using Burp Suite for specific clients.

The scalability is quite good because PortSwigger can be used by multiple users through Jenkins and other things. 

I would rate the scalability a six out of ten. The primary reason is the high number of false positives compared to actual positives. 

Additionally, understanding the scan configuration can be challenging for newcomers. While experienced users can effectively scale their scanning techniques, those with limited experience may find it difficult to understand the process and identify the root causes of errors. 

Moreover, configuring proxy settings can be complex, leading to difficulties for some users. Overall, there are significant areas for improvement in terms of scalability, particularly in enhancing user understanding and reducing false positives. However, compared to other application security tools, Burp Suite still performs well.

There are around three end users using this solution in our company.

The automation features in Burp Suite For vulnerability assessment and penetration testing may not be as extensive as other tools like NetSparker. Other tools may offer more comprehensive capabilities, especially in areas such as source code. Features like capture and OTP testing might be more robustly supported in other tools. There may be limitations in automation with Burp Suite Professional. NetSparker could be more suitable for tasks like two-factor authentication testing.

Four to five are using this solution.

The professional version is not very scalable, whereas the enterprise version is scalable. I can run multiple scans.

I rate Burp Suite's scalability a seven out of ten. We wanted to have more scalability in my last company, where we wanted the enterprise edition, but there were some challenges we faced. We couldn't find a solution to the problem statements for most of our business use cases back then. We then dropped the idea of using Burp Suite Enterprise and opted for a standard one for manual penetration testing.

There were ten users in my unit working with Burp Suite.

It is a scalable solution. Ten specialists are working with Burp Suite Professional currently. We plan to increase the usage in the future. I rate the scalability an eight out of ten.

The Professional version is not very scalable because you need to buy licenses for each user, but the Enterprise version takes care of that.

It is pretty easy to scale the product.

We had ten to 12 people using the solution. It was a small environment.

With the open edition, it's not a problem to install on any number of machines. When it comes to the professional edition, you need a license and you have to pick a license type. I have to use it against a particular machine on which I would run. From there I would run my scans. Let's say I don't find my laptop or my computer fast enough, and I decide to move my license across to a higher processor, higher memory laptop or computer, I can easily move the license across to the new machine.

As long as I am on that particular license use, I have one license that I'm able to move across to one instance at any given point of time. That is quite stable. I think even more than that, for a top-priced edition you can take multiple contract licenses. Something like a license server where you might have five licenses. You might have 10 installations and you can have different people working on various routes use the tool. Only those five licenses will be needed. In that instance, scalability is definitely a great point for most uses.

Currently, if you look at the users that are linked to roles that we have, one is the security test engineer and one is the security test analyst. At any given point in time, only one person uses the tool for engagement in the professional edition. We have about two to three people working with us on these projects.

The solution is very scalable. I'd rate the ability to extend ten out of ten.

Three people are using the solution.

Obviously, Burp Suite is a DAST tool and good asset for pentester's. However, we need to see how best it can be utilized for automation so that DAST can be automated. Dynamic application testing can be automated and can integrate Burp into CI/CD pipeline using Jenkins. That said, we need to make it use it in a more efficient way. There should be some methods or some guidance from Burp on how best we can use it for automation.

In terms of scalability, I think they can increase the number of regions. And more importantly, it doesn't restrict based on the domains you are scanning. So even if tomorrow you suggest some working space, you can still scan the domains for the regions that you have. If you want to increase the number that you scan, you can buy some more. So scalability is not a big problem, but I think if you are scanning from your side, you have to get the license for some of those activities. That's domain based licensing.

Right now we have two or three people using it.

It is possible to work on multiple projects at the same time. I have tried five or six, and it is working fine. I would agree that the scalability is very good, and we have not found a limit yet.

We have approximately thirty users for this solution and they are the testers. As our team grows, we'll need to buy more licenses.

The solution is not designed to be scalable. You have an individual license, and I use it individually.

The scalability of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is good, it can integrate with other platforms.

In my previous company, I worked for we had 50 people using this solution and in my current company we have approximately 500 people using it.

The solution scales well. It's not an issue.

As we only have a couple of licenses, we have not encountered any issues concerning the scalability. 

Scalability is not an issue because it is not centrally connected. Rather, it is a per-license, user-based tool. We have more than 20 users in the company.

Scalability depends upon which of the Burp versions you're using. If you're using Pro it's not scalable because it's dedicated to one person. But when it comes to Enterprise, yes it is scalable, it's easy. 

Easily scalable when it comes to Enterprise version. but Enterprise version itself is not as effective as pro.

I'm a consultant. I tend to use the tool for my clients. I only have one license on my computer. I don't need to scale the product.

The solution is scalable, however. There's a different version for that aspect. You have Community, Professional, and Enterprise editions. Each has different capabilities.

The solution is easily scalable, depending on licensing of course. For example, on the cloud set up, you can easily scale the agents and such. But in terms of bandwidth, maybe when it comes to their reporting feature, there are some limitations with the detail that can be downloaded from the report. I've found that the system can crash if you try to download a report with many details.

Burp is scalable. 

We have around 150 users using Burp at my company. We use it daily.  

The tool is highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. We have four to five customers. We work with medium-sized businesses.

It's better to add only one website per project for the same reason as above.

If you attempt to map a large website using the Spider component, it can take a long time, and the tool may crash.

Over 500 people are using the solution in our organization.

We have had no issues with scalability, although we are using a standalone installation with only a single user. We may expand usage in the future.

Scalability is very simple and easy.

I can't say much about that because we are going to transition to cloud management. I don't know for sure how it is going to scale up. We are still in the testing and planning stages. We currently have approximately five users, and our team is still growing.

I have only used it as a single user. But many of my colleagues use it and I have never heard of any such issues.

No issues encountered.

We use some different tools for web application testing, like Nmap and others. If PortSwigger Burp could actually scale up for web application scanning, that would be really good. This way, instead of using different tools, we could easily rely on one tool for all testing.

It's a scalable solution.

We have more than 30 users in our organization.

I would say that this is a very scalable solution.

We do plan to increase our usage, but not beyond the Professional version. It is not our intention to move to the Enterprise version right now.

Its scalability is great. We have almost five users who are using the product, and they're happy with this product. 

My impressions of the scalability of the solution are good.

The solution doesn't offer very good scalability.