Pure Storage FlashArray Pricing and License Cost

SrManagee02f
Sr Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Pure has been flexible with us on the pricing models. View full review »
James-Kelly
Senior Systems Administrator for Research at Chapman University
In terms of other contemporary arrays, Pure is something you need to have a use case for. It isn't priced for you to just go buy one off-the-shelf. It isn't a casual purchase. If you have an appropriate use case though--heavy lift Oracle Databases, any type of virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI), or workloads that just really need low latency and high throughput--you should consider all-flash at least and probably Pure Storage. For example, we are starting to use our second array for high performance computing, primarily machine learning, and for that sort of research analytics and heavy math computation you really need all-flash. View full review »
Thayne Yost
Senior Network Engineer at US Dept of Energy Idaho Operations Office
We just barely bought our Pure Storage, so we haven't been able to use Evergreen Storage subscription at all yet. However, it's a really cool concept. As long as we maintain our subscription, we will get new controllers every three years and really never have a forklift upgrade like we currently are doing. Just that future-proofing is an ease off of my mind to know that I won't have to do what I'm dong right now again. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in All-Flash Storage Arrays. Updated: October 2019.
371,062 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SeniorMa7726
Senior Manager of Technical Alliances at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
We have an Evergreen Storage subscription. We like it a lot. We recently upgraded from the M-series to the X-series FlashArrays. We used the Evergreen Storage solution and expanded our footprint. View full review »
Operatio6735
Operation Manager at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
We have 16 or 18 arrays. We like to do the three-year support model so that we get Evergreen and therefore, we get free upgrades. We pay around more than 1.5 million dollars. View full review »
Derek Small
President and Principal Architect Engineer at Technetics
With the pricing, they have, it is pretty competitive to spinning disk. I have had a couple of customers who have complained about the cost. It can be a little more expensive than some of the other platforms. After it has been installed, I have never had a customer say, "I wish we wouldn't have spent all that extra money." They have always been happy with the product after it has been installed. They might be on the fence about it because of the price, but everybody who I have ever seen install it, they are always happy with it. View full review »
ITsuper677
IT Supervisor at a insurance company with 501-1,000 employees
Our licensing is on a yearly basis. So, every year, we renew. We could do a three-year contract, but right now, we only do a one-year. View full review »
Delmar Tanner
Sr Systems Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
We have a package deal on the solution because we bought it through a software vendor, so they packaged it with their solution. I don't know what the individual costs would be for the Pure side of it. It was a little costly. The price was ultimately higher than both of the other solutions that we evaluated. I'd say that's the only downside. View full review »
SystemEnd4f8
System Engineer at a consultancy with 5,001-10,000 employees
Pure Storage is a good price and it's a solid product for the price point. Only two or three times over the last 5 years have we had Pure flash drives die to a point where they had to be replaced, so the reliability is also very good. View full review »
Mike Salins
Principal Product Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
It is light years beyond anything else with the same price point. View full review »
Thomas Charewicz
Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Pure Storage is expensive. It comes with features, so you get what you pay for. It is expensive compared to our old storage systems, but from the amount of human effort that you have to pay to babysit a storage system, it reduces that. I don't know if the TCO is reduced, but it's not a concern for us. The guaranty that Pure Storage provides when you purchase it doesn't meet the overall capacity needs to provide extra storage, if needed. Thus, it is not meeting our expectations. View full review »
ITDirect71e2
IT Director at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
In the beginning, we saw that the price is not very good. When we made some compilations about the deduplication and the compression and what the equipment does, including the differentiation of upper management of the storage, the price was not so bad. However, in the beginning, the price was very difficult to justify. View full review »
Christian Gravel
CEO at Intellect Dynamics
Pricing is very competitive, and it's better than other competitors, as we've looked at some of the other competitors on the market. Pure, for the quality of gear we're getting versus the price, is a good value for us. View full review »
Sarkis Kotelyan
System Administrator at VERIFI
You are buying a premium product, and it is worth it. View full review »
Kristi Kettgen
IT Network Engineer at Turlock Irrigation District
The Evergreen Storage subscription is great, because then I get new controllers every three years. View full review »
Andrea Spaziani
Chief Information, Facility, Purchasing and Services Manager at Roma Metropolitane S.r.l.
Everything is included, so there is very simple licensing. F View full review »
Chad Skidmore
Director at Engage
It was less expensive than some of the alternatives. It's not as though it was a premium price to get that kind of quality. It's a very competitive product from a price perspective, but I would say better than many in terms of performance and service. View full review »
CTO6a2e
CTO at a health, wellness and fitness company with 201-500 employees
I definitely like the licensing model. It's a lot better than being "piecemealed" as a customer. I've been extremely happy. Cost-wise, it's been very effective. We're a nonprofit-based organization, so pricing is at the forefront of every conversation we have, and it's been a good marriage between the technical capability of the product, the software that we get, the service and support that we get. From a price standpoint, it's been very effective. View full review »
Strategy2bd0
Strategy Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Pure Storage is all-flash, so this sometimes tends to make it a bit more expensive in the beginning. Once a customer gets a demo and starts using Pure Storage, sees it working with its ease of use, stability, and performance, this encourages them into purchasing the product. View full review »
Jerome Deliege
Head of Infrastructure Architecture at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We would like them to improve the pricing, so we could put them to use some more product, like backup or long-term storage. In the future, if the price goes down, then we could buy different types of products. View full review »
SystemsA417a
Systems Admin at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
It is cheaper than NetApp. View full review »
Jim-Davis
Director of IT at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Like anything, when you are paying more than you were paying for the storage space, you'd like the cost to be less. If they could get into the spinning disk kind of cost, that would be it. But what you are getting for it, you are definitely seeing a good ROI. View full review »
Tim Kovars
Sr. Systems Engineer at Quarles & Brady LLP
It is a more expensive solution, but it is worth it. You are getting what you paid for. I never have to worry about its performance or if it is the root cause of an issue. View full review »
Alberto Zanon
CIO at NGS srl
It's cost-effective when we replace it and has rich improvements with low effort from the customer side. View full review »
SystemsA5733
Systems Analyst at a government with 501-1,000 employees
There are a lot of companies that give a solid performance and a lot of places you can get flash. The pricing wasn't that much different, It's really the simplicity that makes a difference. If the data starts flowing too fast, it slows things down and does it later. Those features are the winners for us. View full review »
David Fong
Sr System Engineer at Stanford University
It's expensive but compared to other solutions, you get what you pay for. View full review »
DeputyEx7942
Deputy Executive Officer at a transportation company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The price-to-performance is good. I looked at Pure about three to four years back, but the price-to-performance wasn't right for us. Now, it's right. View full review »
HeadOfIn50e7
Head of Infrastructure at a health, wellness and fitness company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I am not sure what the costs for the solution are but it is embedded in the solution support. View full review »
Marcel Colsoul
Technical and Pre-sales Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
The pricing of Pure Storage is all-inclusive. It is very fair, and very easy. In comparison, Dell EMC has licensing that needs to be added if you wan to work in a complex environment or in specific functionalities. View full review »
RobertJones
Associate Director of Computing Services at Carnegie Mellon University
The cost was initially high, but once more people were using it, the costs came down. This was because the University was reselling it to other departments. View full review »
SocialAr4d8e
Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The cost of the storage needs improvement. View full review »
SystemAd0ccc
System Administrator at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Our costs are around $100,000. View full review »
Technicab541
Technical Marketing Engineer at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Pure Storage has not helped to reduce our HANA licensing costs. View full review »
Melissa Burg
Director of MIS at Watson Clinic
I'm good with the licensing. Of course, pricing can always be less. That's standard business. It's actually not a bad pricing model, considering I don't have to rip-and-replace. That's huge for me. View full review »
SeniorNec2fe
Senior Network Systems Engineer at a Consumer Goods with 1,001-5,000 employees
It's expensive, but it's worth it. View full review »
Sartor John
IT Manager at Haworth
Pure Storage has not helped us to reduce our licensing costs. View full review »
ITManage17e2
IT Manager at a government with 51-200 employees
We have an Evergreen Storage subscription, which I think is a great feature. It is an excellent choice, if you can afford it. View full review »
Wally Bostrom
Network Manager at Macc 911
The solution could be cheaper. There should be quite a bit of reduction of TCO with just licensing (and stuff) because we run the VM environment off it. View full review »
CTO6499
CTO at a individual & family service with 1,001-5,000 employees
Price is about the only thing that's wrong with it. A little bit better pricing would be great. The client environment for a non-profit 501C3 organization makes it much harder for us to come up with the dollars and to cover the increased cost of hardware support, but we do like the way the product runs. It's perfect for us. View full review »
DevManag32ea
Development Manager at Moreton Bay Technology
Speak to an account manager and get the right deal. View full review »
Georg Dueren
Cloud Solution Architect at Dimension Data
The pricing is an issue. However, being all-flash, it will always be sort of expensive. View full review »
NetworkSe0b1
Network Specialist at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would prefer that they lower their pricing. View full review »
Dave Petroski
Senior Architect at Southwest Gas Corporation
The cost has room for improvement. Our Evergreen Storage subscription is supposed to be good when we go to upgrade. View full review »
ChiefTec2f46
Chief Technology Officer at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
In comparison to the competitors, Pure is very price-competitive for the future functionality that it provides. View full review »
Cecilia Lenasdotter
Network Engineer at Altura Credit Union
The cost has room for improvement. View full review »
CTOa58c
CTO at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It's expensive, but you get what you pay for. View full review »
SystemEne60c
System Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
I don't know the exact cost but it's around $1,000. View full review »
NetworkE15cd
Network Engineer at a logistics company with 201-500 employees
The licensing is $100,000. View full review »
Director85c1
Director at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Price per terabyte is substantially higher than their competition. We would like to see it drop. View full review »
Javier Echave
Pre-Sales Engineer at Cisco Systems, Inc.
The price is too high. Because the price is a bit higher than other products, the data reduction equalizes the price with amount of the data reduction. View full review »
Frank Thompson
Director of Network Services at Engage
All storage is expensive so any price improvement would help. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in All-Flash Storage Arrays. Updated: October 2019.
371,062 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email