Tricentis qTest Pricing

NM
Quality Assurance Team Lead at Parkview Health

For the 35 concurrent licenses, we pay something like $35,000 a year. There are no additional costs to the standard licensing fees, until we get into Tosca. 

We have the Elite version, which allows us to have Insight, Parameters, Explorer Sessions, Pulse, Launch, and Flood.

View full review »
Sudipto Dey - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Lead at Linde

For me, pricing for Tricentis qTest is moderate, so that's a five out of ten. It's more affordable than my company's previous solution, which was Micro Focus ALM.

View full review »
RL
Assistant Vice President, IT Quality Assurance at Guardian Life Insurance

I have not looked at it recently, but our license price point is somewhere between $1,000 and $2,000 a year. It's pretty low when you think about what we used to have. We haven't had any additional costs from Tricentis. We do the hosting on Amazon, so that's our cost.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Tricentis qTest
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Tricentis qTest. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
JK
Testing Lead Manager at PDC Energy

The price I was quoted is just under $60,000 for 30 licenses, annually, and that's with a 26.5 percent discount.

View full review »
RV
Automation Lead at LogiXML

We signed for a year and I believe we paid $24,000 for Flood, Manager, and qTest Insights. We paid an extra for $4,000 for the migration support.

View full review »
Anuj-Kataria - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Manager at Next Solutions

Based on whatever I heard, I can say that Tricentis qTest is a little costlier than other test management tools, like Jira, Zephyr, or Xray.

View full review »
RO
Sr. Manager Quality Assurance at Forcepoint LLC (Formerly Raytheon|Websense)

There is an upfront, yearly cost for concurrent licenses, meaning we're not limited to a specific number of users, only to a specific number of users online at a certain time. That works really well for us because we're a global organization. We'll have people online in San Diego, and those licenses then can be used later in the day by people online in Tel Aviv. It's been a really great licensing model for us.

I believe that there is a maintenance cost as well. I'm not really involved in the payment of that, so I don't really know what it would be.

View full review »
VS
Product QA Manager at Reflexis Systems

It is pretty costly, from what I remember. It's quite a few times more costly than other tools on the market. We compared it to the other leading test management tools. We went for it because of the features and the value it could add to our organization.

View full review »
DF
Senior Director of Quality Engineering at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

We're paying a little over $1,000 for a concurrent license. One of the solutions we looked at was about half of that but that one is very much a bare-bones test management tool.

There are no additional costs. We pay a flat yearly rate for each license.

View full review »
MS
Division Chief with 10,001+ employees

We're paying $19,000 a year right now for qTest, with 19 licenses. All the on-premise support is bundled into that.

View full review »
MD
Manager, IT Quality Assurance (EDM/ITSRC/Infrastructure) at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

I believe we have an annual subscription.

View full review »
it_user179637 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Expert with 10,001+ employees

I can't comment, I wasn't involved.

View full review »
it_user589632 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Portfolio Manager - Testing at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees

The pricing can be still competitive.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Tricentis qTest
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Tricentis qTest. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.