Quadient Inspire Previous Solutions
SP
Sachin Patel
Solutions Architect at Customer Centrics
We did use another solution and switched due to the flexibility, ease of use, and speed.
View full review »NB
reviewer1850622
Senior Software Engineer at Tech Mahindra
We did not use a different solution before.
View full review »KG
Kellie Godwin
GMC Inspire Programmer at PCI Group
Previously, I used DesignMerge in Adobe InDesign. I switched because the company I was with was using DesignMerge internally and outsourcing the Inspire work.
View full review »The previous tool we used was called Pres. This was much too cumbersome to use it did not contain a GUI visual and was entirely script/code until output. This was deemed not to be efficient in helping us meet our clients' requirements promptly and effectively. Processing times also proved to be a problem, especially when we began to appreciate the power of Quadient Inspire.
View full review »TJ
Tomaž Juvančič
Consultant at Tomaž Juvančič s.p.
Our solution prior to this was used a long, long time ago (around 2003, I think). We used a different document composition software in the Telco that I was working for. That software couldn't satisfy our requests for splitting PDFs.
When I first saw the Quadient solution (at the time it was called GMC PrintNetT 4.5), I was amazed by its performance. With the click of a button, it could generate millions of PDF files, ready to be archived.
View full review »DN
David Nixon
Senior Technical Consultant at Customer Centrics International
xPression (and other platforms). The switch to Inspire was driven by reducing overheads in multiple legacy platforms, many of which were required to support a single function of a multi-function solution. The Inspire single solution was by far a better option.
View full review »We did use an alternative but it wasn't as robust and didn't allow the manipulation of PDFs.
View full review »DM
reviewer1020249
Data and Laser Executive at a marketing services firm
The previous tool we used was much too cumbersome to use and seemed not to be efficient in helping us meet our clients' requirements promptly and effectively. Processing times also proved to be a problem, especially when we began to appreciate the power of Inspire.
View full review »