One Identity Manager Other Solutions Considered
We evaluated SailPoint, Oracle Identity Manager, and Microsoft Identity Manager. When we compared this solution against SailPoint, they were very close, but the local support and development capabilities were the reasons for going with One Identity.
View full review »SS
Srivalli Sristla
IAM Engineering Manager at a construction company with 10,001+ employees
My company had to choose between SailPoint, IdentityIQ, and One Identity Manager. SailPoint IdentityIQ is heavily based on Java, whereas One Identity Manager is based on mostly Windows and PowerShell scripting. Our company is a big Microsoft shop, so it only made sense to go with One Identity Manager.
The simplicity of One Identity Manager is good. That makes it easier to adapt. Sometimes, I wonder why it is not so popular in the US.
There is definitely a learning curve for One Identity Manager. This is true for any solution, including One Identity Manager. However, the time that it takes to learn is different compared to Oracle products, where it takes much more time compared to One Identity Manager.
View full review »VS
reviewer1928886
Founder at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
We evaluated SailPoint and Saviynt apart from One Identity Manager.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
One Identity Manager
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about One Identity Manager. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SS
reviewer955311
Director, Global Identity and Access Technologies at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
We had gone into PoC, originally, with Avatier, CA, and Quest. But Volcker had been purchased by Quest soon after. We liked Quest, we liked our salesperson and when the tool began to grow and when we re-org'd and I was allowed to choose a different tool, we decided to do a PoC.
From a cost perspective, One Identity has the biggest bang for the buck. We do not have a large team and I cannot spend a lot on services. I wouldn't even look at the likes of IBM and Oracle because I know how expensive they would be.
View full review »Our company takes on projects for different types of clients, so we chose this solution because our clients had this solution implemented. Therefore, selecting this option made managing things more efficient.
View full review »RB
reviewer2036130
Lead IAM manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
In addition to SailPoint, I have worked with ForgeRock, Microsoft FIM a long way back, and others.
SailPoint has a lot of advantages as compared to One Identity Manager. First, the installation time is very short, and the process is very smooth. Second, it is an implementer's tool, meaning an implementer enjoys developing applications with SailPoint. SailPoint may not be that user-friendly, but it is very implementer-friendly. Implementation is easier with it. And because it is implementer-friendly, implementers can add value to the product, meaning its capabilities can be enhanced based on customer requirements, which is something that is lacking with One Identity Manager. And compared to SailPoint, One Identity Manager has fewer features.
Most of my customers in the region where I work, The Middle East, prefer on-prem solutions. They don't like the cloud. SailPoint and One Identity Manager both have on-prem solutions, so I am focusing my comparison on them.
I have also worked on cloud-based solutions but they have their challenges.
View full review »MP
ProductMe39b
Senior Product Manager for Identity & Access Management at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees
We started an RFP in 2013 or 2014. Then, the end of the process was in 2015, we selected One Identity Manager by comparing it against many other vendors.
View full review »BF
Vp841f
VP at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
We have a different product for privileged account governance.
View full review »MT
Matt Thomson
Principal Consultant at UNIFY Solutions
We did evaluate other options, however, I wasn't involved in that process.
View full review »PL
reviewer1056471
Manager Global Identity & Access Management at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
The product is quite flexible. In my previous company, I worked with Microsoft products. Now, I am using One Identity. Its functions are easier to use and more intuitive. You also have more functions available to businesses.
View full review »We evaluated Ping One Identity, SAP IDM, Oracle Access Manager, Net IQ Identity Manager, and RSA Access Manager.
View full review »KW
reviewer1056465
Service Owner Identity & Access Management at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
All the big ones were on our list. We chose One Identity because of the possibilities that were already present in the system. There were more than in the other ones.
View full review »Before choosing this solution we also evaluated TIM, OpenIAM, OIM, and SailPoint. All had week-long PoCs with us. We chose Q1IM (at the time, D1IM). SailPoint was a close second.
View full review »We did evaluate multiple other options before choosing. Hitachi ID, Salesforce (they really do have an IAM offering), Oracle.
View full review »AE
MrOak
Senior System Administrator at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
We looked at a few different solutions. Most of them were better suited for only one target system and some had poor add-ons for the other targets we needed. OIM seemed the most balanced and also has connectors for other targets we were planning on using.
View full review »AG
SystemsS20e4
Systems Specialist at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We looked at one other vendor, but it was some time ago. It might have been something from Microsoft. I don't think we looked at it that seriously because, as I remember, we decided on One Identity quite fast.
View full review »SG
SystemsSe13e
Systems Specialist at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Microsoft was one of the solutions we looked at, as well as some small Finnish companies. We went with One Identity because of the features. Somebody had already made the stuff that we needed, the functionality that we needed was there and didn't require so much customization. And the partner that was able to give us the solution was also a factor in our decision to go with One Identity.
View full review »SK
Techsuppa0986
Technical Support Analyst at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We did look at other options, but it boiled down to choosing One Identity with no second thought.
View full review »SS
reviewer1056453
COO at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
We were also looking at the Microsoft Identity Manager. However, we decided on One Identity Manager because it has a wider coverage of different products.
View full review »DP
Solutionfcd3
Solution Designer at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
We had a shortlist of three vendors: SailPoint IdentityIQ, IBM, and One Identity. We looked at functionalities, what came out-of-the-box with each product, and what needed configuring.
View full review »AM
ITBusinef7a0
IT Business Process Specialist at a consumer goods company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The finalists were SailPoint IdentityIQ and One Identity. The reason that we chose One Identity was due to the logic of the connectors that they have. From those, we understood that this solution contained expertise on target systems.
View full review »We only upgraded from the same vendor, Novell at the time.
View full review »I was not involved.
View full review »RA
Riyas Abdulkhader
Security Architect, InfoSec Consultant at Confidential ( Sensitive Industry)
We did not evaluate other options.
View full review »Yes we chose Dell One over Oracle IDM, IBM, NETIQ, and MS FIM.
View full review »We evaluated other options such as SailPoint, CA and Oracle.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
One Identity Manager
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about One Identity Manager. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.