VMware RabbitMQ Other Solutions Considered

AF
Director Consulting Services at M3tech

In my previous organization, we heavily relied on Tibco messaging solutions like Tibco RD (Rendezvous) and Tibco RV (Rendezvous) for the entire rating system. I have also explored Apache Kafka.

View full review »
Elaynchezhiyan Kandasamy - PeerSpot reviewer
Mulesoft Developer at Dwinsoft Technologies

The configuration and setup of Anypoint MQ are easier.

View full review »
it_user566880 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees

I personally have not explored other queuing solutions, but have used Akka HTTP, with is a fully asynchronous web server of sorts. It's not a queuing system, but I mention it because of the asynchronous behavior. RabbitMQ was perfect for our current solution, however.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
VMware RabbitMQ
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about VMware RabbitMQ. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
BL
Head of Data & Infrastructure at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

We evaluated Apache Kafka, NSQ, and ActiveMQ.

View full review »
TS
Java Programmer at Netcompany

I was considering using ActiveMQ on AWS, but after some research, I decided RabbitMO was a more complex solution and one that is more commonly used, so I chose RabbitMQ over it.

View full review »
it_user622962 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director - Information Technology at a transportation company with 51-200 employees

I looked at other service bus/message queue solutions. In particular, I investigated:

  • Azure’s Queue Storage: No real service bus ability without plugins
  • AWS’s Simple Notification Service: Not much in the way of service bus capability. It did not allow private queues on the fly.
  • A few other open-source message brokers

RabbitMQ seemed the most full-featured option for what we needed.

View full review »
AF
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

We didn’t have any alternatives. Our company has a contract with PCF, so it was our only option.

View full review »
it_user635418 - PeerSpot reviewer
VP of Software at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

We looked at ZeroMQ, Kafka and Redis.

View full review »
MT
CTO, CIO, Chief Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

We are also evaluating Apache Kafka. Our process is very disciplined. We look at the analytics, the abstraction, the architecture relative to our technical architecture, we ask ourselves questions about the use case, which is better for use A or B. Kafka is not as simple for “publish and subscribe”. You can do it, but not the best fit for us. However as a queueing system, Kafka is great. The records are stored on the queue in the order they are received, However, you can easily search by topic no matter how large the list. Important if you keep track of everything.


View full review »
it_user643737 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Developer/Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

We looked at MSMQ, NServiceBus, Azure Service Bus, and Apache Kafka.

View full review »
it_user564939 - PeerSpot reviewer
Research Assistant at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Yes, I evaluated Kafka.

Kafka is more suitable to large amount events in order. RabbitMQ is more suitable to the related small amount of messages, which is my situation and I don’t care about the message order.

View full review »
NT
Head of Cloud Platform Development at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

We evaluated several other solutions; the MQSeries and MSMQ.

View full review »
it_user618963 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Specialist at a security firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

We looked at Kafka, but we needed the routing as well.

View full review »
it_user575835 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mid Level Software Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

We also evaluated ZeroMQ and EasyNetQ.

View full review »
it_user624792 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I am not aware of other evaluated options.

View full review »
it_user622737 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software architect & back-end engineer at a tech services company

I have looked at Apache ActiveMQ and Kafka.

View full review »
it_user560979 - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Software Engineer at a tech company with 501-1,000 employees

I did not look into other solutions.

View full review »
it_user566901 - PeerSpot reviewer
Graduate Teaching Assistant at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

We chose this solution around 2010, so there weren’t many options at the time. We evaluated the native JMS method and it didn't scale up well.

View full review »
Namrata G - PeerSpot reviewer
Independent Technology Consultant - Financial Softwares at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

We researched ZeroMQ, RabbitMQ, and Kafka. We found that Kafka was a bit of an overkill because our requirements were quite simple. RabbitMQ was pretty easy to set up, which is why we chose it.

View full review »
it_user827274 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

I have evaluated and researched Axon, RabbitMQ, Kafka, and IBM MQ.

View full review »
it_user622743 - PeerSpot reviewer
Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We looked at the Redis solution, but it was not a good fit for our needs.

View full review »
it_user624789 - PeerSpot reviewer
President, Applications and Security Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

We evaluated Apache Kafka also.

View full review »
it_user589473 - PeerSpot reviewer
Full Stack Developer Intern at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

We did not evaluate any other solution prior to this one.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
VMware RabbitMQ
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about VMware RabbitMQ. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.