RadView WebLOAD Initial Setup

it_user1265766 - PeerSpot reviewer
Test Team Lead at Medtronic, Inc.

The initial setup was fairly complicated but I think that's pretty standard across the board for most load test software.

View full review »
JL
Quality Assurance Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees

There isn't any downtime because of upgrade installation. The only downtime is actually scheduling. Load tests are roughly 5% of what we do, and if we have to do an upgrade, it's more or less upgrading all of the machines. We have three Microsoft Windows load machines and three Linux software load machines and each one of our analyst has a console on their desktop. It's just scheduling the downtime on the machines, which really isn't too hard. Once you actually schedule the downtime, it installs pretty quickly. It's just that you have to upgrade all Radview machines, once you've moved to a new version of it, and all the components in the environment have to be upgraded to that version as well. It's just scheduling downtime in machines, and bringing it back up after the install has run. It's a very quick install.

View full review »
it_user341928 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Buyer's Guide
Performance Testing Tools
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Radview, Apache, OpenText and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user118665 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director, Test Engineering at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

It was straightforward, we had great documentation. I’d give Radview 10/10 for documentation. It was split out very nicely. We had no issues it was very clear.

View full review »
Vadim Urintsov - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Tester / Quality Assurance Analyst at Bitnami

The initial setup is not complex if you have background knowledge. I rate the solution a four out of ten, with one being easy and ten being hard.

View full review »
it_user306810 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Director at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Initial setup was straightforward.

View full review »
it_user303675 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Administrative Systems at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Ease/complexity of setup was somewhere in the middle. There wasn't a lot of coding, but it's an intricate product and once you learn it, it's easy to maintain and manage. But there certainly was a bit of training at the outset with their staff and mine.

View full review »
it_user1202271 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

There is too much documentation required in order to set up this solution.

View full review »
it_user327960 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager, Software Test Engineering with 1,001-5,000 employees

We deploy it quite frequently with current integrations. We use the integration with Amazon Web Services very frequently with the standup of additional which makes capacity very easy within the tool. As it integrates very easily with AWS, it allows the creating of load generators on demand, and then tearing them down after, so we can save on cost.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Performance Testing Tools
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Radview, Apache, OpenText and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.