RadView WebLOAD Room for Improvement

Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

We have had a lot of trouble with this solution, and it is actually adapted to our application.

Technical support is slow and takes lot of time, so it needs to be improved. Because we don't have any support for this solution, we are thinking about changing.

The user documentation is too longĀ .

If the developer could write their own code then this solution would be much better. When you hit record and play, you don't know what is happening in the background. It is generating code, but you don't see it.

This solution is difficult to work with.

View full review »
Test Team Lead at Medtronic, Inc.

The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options. In order to get a report out of it, there are so many options that it almost gets overwhelming.

If it was simpler or like right now, we're having to go through RadView to figure out what exactly we want and we have a meeting with them coming up soon. It's not intuitive to get the report that I'm looking for.

View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Radview, Apache, Micro Focus and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: June 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.