Rally Software Room for Improvement

Director Delivery at a hospitality company with 10,001+ employees
I don't know that I can answer this, because I'm not using it day to day. I'm using CA PPM now, and I know we're looking to integrate Agile Central into CA PPM, which I believe is an option. When I used it before I would say the stronger CA can get on dependency mapping the better. That's the biggest hiccup. As you're setting up your features, they should make it easier to flag the dependencies, either across features or across projects. Then you're more set up for success. View full review »
Test Automation Architect at CenturyLink
One problem I see is that if there is a dependent user story - for example, if my team is working on one thing and there is a dependent user story from another team - we can have a dependency created but we don't know if there is a change of status from the other team. That is something which is very important for Agile Central to look into so that if the other team makes any changes we will be notified as well. As of now, we get an email alert but that's not sufficient. We can overlook it. What I'm suggesting is that they have something which populates on the team level so Team One and Team Two can communicate on dependent user stories. That would be really helpful. In addition, reports are confined to teams. For example, I have five to six teams under me, if I have to pull a report, it will be mapped to a single team. I have to pull five teams' reports and then consolidate them to see what the metrics are. I don't have an option to actually add multiple teams to one report. Finally, it's not capable of some things such as CI/CD. Agile Central is still not there. For CI/CD you need a separate tool and a separate repository called a GitLab. Then you need to run that through a continuous integration called Jenkins. I want to see a holistic approach when you're going with DevOps. There should be just one enterprise tool which is capable of all these things. As of now, Agile Central is just a test management tool. View full review »
Project Manager
I would like for workspace admins to be able to hide projects in the Project Picker and not lose any historical data; make them invisible to certain users, visible to certain users, depending on permission sets. That would be lovely. I'd like the ability to customize reports without having to incur Professional Services, or having to write my own code GitHub and then implement that as a custom report. That's untenable. It's not sustainable. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about CA (A Broadcom Company), Atlassian, Microsoft and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: November 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Senior Analyst Developer at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I think the interface could be a little bit more visual and less wordy. Right now, it seems like it's just a lot of text on the page. In other ticketing systems where it's more visual, you can see more of a flow. But in this one it's more just a list of tasks. I would like to see that a little bit better, especially considering it has so many great organizational features, like child tasks, different artifacts. It would be great to see it presented more appropriately. View full review »
IT Manager at DISH Network Corporation
We are not on the most current version, so it may have been addressed, I have not really seen the new product yet. I would like to see more in the way of capitalization. I spend a lot of time on capitalization. Working out capitalization, it is largely manual work, where it does not have to be. The tool, I think can support it. When it is a story, capitalization in the current version of the solution we are using, occurs at the task level. I would like to see it roll up a little better to the story level, then up to the feature. View full review »
Ricardo Pianta
Engineer Manager at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
There was some evolution, and as we have this old on-premise, it does takes longer. However, this complex requirement management, having different perspectives and different ways to organize the hierarchy of things, that is something that we value. It looks like the tool is at the beginning of having this new kind of approach, and we expecting different things from it. It could improve by being self-organizing: user stories, different hierarchies, and different perspectives. Not just as a single hierarchical structure, but something that can be multidimensional. View full review »
Kent Seaman
Director Of Tool Chain Automation at American Express
More customization capabilities would be helpful. Providing a little bit more structure around how the system should be set up in terms of the hierarchy structure might be helpful as well. View full review »
Shane Mckee
Director Of Enterprise Architecture at Best Western
I would like to see more Kanban support. As it stands, it doesn't seem to have the features or the layouts that the teams really need to be able to execute their tasks. It almost tries to force you into more of a Scrum style. View full review »
Bryan Nelson
Agile Coach at T-Mobile
What I have learned is that a lot of features that I am looking for, in many cases, are part of a different tool set that CA offers. Really it is more learning about which features and tool, those features would be in. A lot of the features that we would be looking to add, I am learning may not be within Agile Central, but part of another CA tool set. It is about learning which tool that would be and how to integrate it. It would be nice if CA had those tools as part of a package rather than having to try and find multiple tools to integrate together. Some of the additional features that we are looking at would be better roadmapping capabilities and increased robustness around permissions. More of a view into the overall lifecycle of the portfolio items, so post acceptance of a story through the pipeline. Those are some of the key things that I would like to see. View full review »
Thomas Hall
Director of Delivery at Physicians Mutual Insurance
We have been talking about improvements in the quality section of Agile Central. The quality section does allow you to do test cases and test sets, and all these things, but it does not integrate very well with the portfolio and feature side, which causes some challenges. View full review »
Manager Application Developer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
The navigation within the tool sometimes is a little tricky for me. I'm sure with more use, more practice, I'll become accustomed to it, but some of the things just aren't intuitive. View full review »
Senior Director at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
Let's look at the portfolio level. Let's take a look at what capabilities are needed to scale our teams and really add them to the tool. View full review »
We would like maybe to have more integration with test automation. As it is right now, it does not support automation of the quality assurance process. It just supports manual testing. View full review »
Frederic Ferrant
Scrum Master for a Big International Bank in Belgium at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
I think there is a missing link with the development activity. Some developers are pushing in new versions of the code, but you cannot make the link from the user story to a specific application version. View full review »
Allen Ward
Team Leader with 201-500 employees
Not as user friendly as VersionOne. At first I liked VersionOne better and was very disappointed in the switch. However, after a month or so I was quite happy with CA Agile. View full review »
Martin Quiroga
IT Consultancy Manager with 11-50 employees
CA Agile Central does not have a workflow tool included. If possible, it may be necessary for some companies that this type of feature be included. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about CA (A Broadcom Company), Atlassian, Microsoft and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: November 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email