Ranorex Studio Pricing

Aws V - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.

View full review »
BG
Director Of Quality Assurance at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

I don't have those numbers, but it's under $10,000. I think it's around $6,000 or something like that. We have, I believe, four floating licenses and one console license, so it's a pretty small install base. They have different licenses, including a node license, node lock license, or floating license. I believe their floating licenses are more expensive.

View full review »
FP
Quality Control Analyst at SIA

We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD).

At this time I am developing. We only have one license, but there will be two runtime licenses.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex, SmartBear, OpenText and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SS
Senior Consultant at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees. 

View full review »
FP
Quality Control Analyst at SIA

This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors.

The price of the solution was approximately €900. The upgrades tend to be a little less expensive.

View full review »
it_user342594 - PeerSpot reviewer
SW Engineer at Descartes Systems Group

The Ranorex pricing and licensing seems to be adequate, considering the feature set, level of support and frequency of updates. It’s not cheap, but definitely not the most expensive test automation tool.

View full review »
PZ
Communications Infrastructure, QA Leader at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

The licensing fees depend on the number of users.

View full review »
it_user333807 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Lead at a media company with 51-200 employees

The pricing for this tool is acceptable for the amount of features it provides and as for licensing we are small company and only have two licenses. I believe they offer some savings based on the number of licenses purchased.

View full review »
it_user336486 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Test Manager at Konica Minolta Business Solutions Europe GmbH

We have purchased the premium license with an enterprise package, which includes special care from Ranorex such as code review, high priority in issue solving etc.

View full review »
it_user327651 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Manager at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

It’s always a good idea to negotiate price with vendors to get the best possible deals balance the numbers of licenses with the group/bulk discounts.

View full review »
it_user333822 - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation Software Engineer, CI/CD Implementation at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Floating licensing are good for running the scripts on different machines (runtime). For developing, we are using node-locked ones, because Ranorex requires Windows, so we need to buy Windows laptops. It's the biggest drawback of Ranorex that it's limited to one operating system.

View full review »
HB
Test Expert/Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

There are standard and premium licensing plans on a fixed price. I am not sure of the cost at this time. However, in our case, we find we need two different types of licensing to meet our requirements for clients and management. It depends on the client because we are a consultancy and serve small, medium and enterprise businesses.

View full review »
it_user334857 - PeerSpot reviewer
Professional QA Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

The pricing for this product is OK, it might not be cheap for a small company but extending the licenses is a lot cheaper than buying it the first time.

View full review »
RP
Automation Tester at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

The solution offers a free 30-day trial.

View full review »
TS
Test Manager/ QA Consultant at Aspire Systems
it_user346857 - PeerSpot reviewer
Test Automation Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Compared to the benefits that the product brings, I would say that the prices are reasonable and justified. I think the great advantage this tool offers is that it supports multi-technologies so that it is possible to cover the test automation of variety of different applications and systems.

View full review »
it_user290649 - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees

Ranorex, like many other automation tools is expensive. I highly suggest planning out how many licenses you need ahead of time, and try to plan your suite to use as many licenses as possible. With this approach you should be able to get as much testing done as possible without breaking the bank with licensing costs.

View full review »
it_user328539 - PeerSpot reviewer
Staff Test Development Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

It’s good that Ranorex has not changed to floating runtime licenses. This means that users can have flexibility for the managing of their test environments, and get the best return on their investment of license.

View full review »
it_user333708 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Developer/Tester at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

This is completely based on the project, and a company's willingness to forgo other cheaper alternatives. Ranorex does offer a free trial which should give most customers an idea of what they're getting into.

View full review »
it_user333795 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Test Engineer at a manufacturing company with 501-1,000 employees

We have a number of floating licenses.

View full review »
it_user341952 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Analyst at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

We're really satisfied with the pricing as well and buying licenses is easy. If you have a large automation team try floating license and runtime license which is cheaper than premium license.

View full review »
it_user342603 - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Support Engineer at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Pricing is fair.

View full review »
it_user334845 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA/Automation Specialist at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

The license types can be confusing.

View full review »
it_user346827 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

We can invest depending on the requirements of the business. Run-time licenses can be used if you don't need to develop scripts, floating-type license, or node-lock license.

View full review »
it_user341937 - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Development Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

The product is a bit expensive, especially the licenses which should be cheaper.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex, SmartBear, OpenText and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.