Ranorex Studio Other Solutions Considered
We tried Catalog Studio, but desktop automation didn't work well, so we abandoned it.
View full review »My customer wanted me to do the tool analysis and provide recommendations. I evaluated several tools and picked this because it is easy to learn and use, even at graduate entry level college, and I was able to show the value to the customer by running the scripts in ROI. Multiple technology support and very good Object SPY feature.
SS
reviewer1954935
Senior Consultant at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The solution is a good tool but is not well known in the market or widely used.
Many people prefer Selenium where you can import DLLs so it is important to stay familiar with Selenium instead of focusing solely on Ranorex or else you will fall behind in technical expertise.
We have decided to move to Katalon.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Ranorex Studio
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Ranorex Studio. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SM
reviewer1120770
Associate Manager at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.
View full review »Before we picked Ranorex, we did a direct comparison with Squish and TestComplete.
View full review »PZ
reviewer1363938
Communications Infrastructure, QA Leader at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
When we started using this tool a few years ago, we had finished an evaluation where Ranorex was the winner in terms of capability.
We will be working on new products and we are in the process of looking at more test automation tools. Right now, we are investigating Telerik Test Studio to see if it has more capability than Ranorex.
View full review »The ROI would be the man hours saved by implementing the automation suite. The pricing for this tool is acceptable for the amount of features it provides and as for licensing we are small company and only have two licenses. I believe they offer some savings based on the number of licenses purchased.
View full review »We had an evaluation period to choose most suitable product from ones available on the market and during that we have tried many of them. We have discovered that Ranorex has native support for all technologies and products used within our company, such as SAP, all Microsoft Dynamics products, SharePoint, Kentico, web based portals and others including support for mobile testing. Also, it beats the others in stability, because other products crashed very often once using recording module.
View full review »We evaluated many different products for the engagement. We went with Ranorex due to its relative ease of use, and its support for automating desktop/WPF applications out of the box.
View full review »HB
Consulta3877
Test Expert/Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
As a consultant, we may choose to work other products in addition to or instead of Ranorex. It will depend on client needs. So yes, we do evaluate other tools but Ranorex fits many situations.
View full review »We compared some solutions like SOAP UI and Selenium but for our use it was clearly that Ranorex was the best option. As Ranorex is based upon C# and the .NET framework and our software is also developed in C#.NET it felt familiar and testers could also get help from developers if required.
View full review »TS
Thangavel Sundaram
Test Manager/ QA Consultant at Aspire Systems
When I try Silverlight automation (5-6 years back) no tools were promising, (Including popular tools in the market), So chosen Ranorex. But now many tools supporting Silver light applications, So better if we do re-evaluation against latest tools in the market
View full review »We did some tests with Selenium, but you still need a lot of dev skills to setup and write an automated test.
View full review »We evaluated Selenium and HP Quality Center. We found Ranorex very helpful in supporting both web and desktop based application. It’s very easy to use.
View full review »We tried several, and we chose Ranorex for it’s ability to cover large amounts of testing with minimal coding.
View full review »We initially tried out the CodedUI by Microsoft, but the coding effort plus the product maturity at that stage convinced us to pick Ranorex.
View full review »We tried using HP QTP and Selenium, but opted for Ranorex because of its reasonable price and the ease of use of the automation tool.
View full review »No other options were evaluated.
View full review »HPE, and Selenium WebDriver, which is open-source. We went with Ranorex because of compliance and the company's requirements.
View full review »We also looked at Coded UI.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Ranorex Studio
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Ranorex Studio. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.