This solution might not be needed for everyone because of its high performance.

There is minimal maintenance required, such as updating the solution.

I would recommend this solution to others. The detailed reports are valuable.

I rate Rapid7 AppSpider an eight out of ten.

I would rate Rapid7 AppSpider a seven out of ten.

Overall, I rate it an eight out of ten. If Rapid7 had a feature where we could scan for the mobile application, I would rate it a nine.

I would rate AppSpider seven out of ten.

This solution is a leader in the industry.

The reporting is really important for us. We are certified and we are compliant.

We needed both AppSpider and Nexpose to complete for our requirements. It also has another useful module called Metasploit.

My advice is that everybody should try this solution. It's excellent.

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

On a scale of one to ten (where one is the worst and ten is the best), I would rate Rapid7 AppSpider as a seven or eight-out-of-ten.  

We use the on-premises deployment model. I personally prefer the on-premises version over the cloud version.

I'd recommend the solution, but only the on-premises deployment model as it's very portable and can reside on your workstation. You can use it to provide reports without having to be connected to the internet.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I would recommend Rapid7 AppSpider to others.

I would recommend this product. I would give them a higher rating but they need to have more integration available. They do not have integration for GitLabs for example.  

I rate Rapid7 AppSpider a nine out of ten.

This is a product that I would recommend.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

All aspects of Rapid7 AppSpider are good. On a scale from one to ten, I would rate this product an eight.

My advice to anybody who is considering this solution is that there are other products out there, and everyone has their own requirements. If AppSpider meets the requirements then it is a great one to implement.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

It has good features.