Rapid7 Metasploit Scalability
The solution is scalable.
Only our Cybersecurity team is using the solution; there are approximately five people using it. We have not given access to any other Support teams.
View full review »I rate the product's scalability a seven out of ten. I am a single user in the company.
View full review »It doesn't provide scalability.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Vulnerability Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Rapid7, Tenable, Invicti and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
It's a product that can scale as necessary.
View full review »It is a scalable solution. I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten.
View full review »Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
View full review »SE
reviewer2295975
Senior cybersecurity engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
It is scalable. It's in line with our needs. There are around five end users. We have possible plans to increase the further usage.
View full review »AG
AlanGallagher
CEO at Virtual Security International
The solution is not very scalable, it does not provide any automation to be able to scale it.
View full review »AS
reviewer1088721
Principal security consultant at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
For the projects that we have worked on, the scalability has been fine. I'm not sure how it would perform in a hybrid environment, but for our on-premises deployment, it is quite a nice product.
We have a team of 12 people and it is used for perhaps 10 large companies.
View full review »MM
reviewer1432815
Project Director at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The scalability is not that good.
When you use the command-line interface, not very much of the process is automated. There should always be an expert present to work with the software. Under the GUI, I believe there are some features that can be automated for testing.
The solution was not intended to be automated because penetration testing requires attention and caution because it's done on a live network with line services. Automation can damage the target network or the system on the network.
You can automate the input of data, but the results are not satisfactory.
The scalability should definitely be improved.
View full review »EG
reviewer1369920
Senior Information Technology Security Officer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
So far, for our purposes, we've never run into issues with scalability. It's been good. I'm not sure how it would be for other companies, however, I don't forsee there being any issues if they should require the solution to expand to meet their needs.
View full review »ME
reviewer1674711
Senior Cyber Security Specialist at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Our company performs penetration testing for our clients. It is not used in the client's organization by any users normally, instead, it is used by the penetration tester, who performs the penetration testing activities.
Our company is a professional services company with 15 team members. All 15 team members are using this solution.
View full review »I do not think it scales. But, I do not understand why someone would want to scale Metasploit, at it is very specific on what you are attacking. It attacks a particular server. You can only scale if you are using Nmap.
View full review »AA
Informate5e5
Information Security and Governance Lead Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Its scalability can be improved.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Vulnerability Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Rapid7, Tenable, Invicti and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.