Red Hat Ceph Storage Previous Solutions
AB
reviewer234109
Sr. Systems Engineer at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
We used traditional fiber based SAN storages before we started using Ceph. The main reasons for switching to Ceph were:
- Ability to provide block as well as object storage
- Open source system
- Scalability: Performance actually improves as we scale the cluster bigger
We deal with various Red Hat products.
View full review »FQ
Fu Qingyun
Engineer at Orcadt
Previously we used a product that we developed in-house.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Dell Technologies, LizardFS and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: March 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
None. This was a pilot project and it has worked out.
View full review »I have used traditional storage on much smaller scales: ZFS, SVM, VxVM, and NetApp. They do not fit the use case and demands of a growing Cloud infrastructure.
View full review »I have used many solutions but not as extensively as Ceph. I switched to Ceph because of its architecture and because it is a one-stop shop when it comes to storage.
View full review »FC
Flavio Carvalho
Senior Information Technology Specialist at a tech consulting company with 501-1,000 employees
We had no previous solution. My first contact with ephemeral storage is through Ceph.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Dell Technologies, LizardFS and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: March 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.