Red Hat Ceph Storage Previous Solutions

AB
Sr. Systems Engineer at a tech company with 10,001+ employees

We used traditional fiber based SAN storages before we started using Ceph. The main reasons for switching to Ceph were:

  • Ability to provide block as well as object storage
  • Open source system
  • Scalability: Performance actually improves as we scale the cluster bigger
View full review »
Joos Mulio - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior System Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

We deal with various Red Hat products. 

View full review »
FQ
Engineer at Orcadt

Previously we used a product that we developed in-house.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Dell Technologies, LizardFS and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: March 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user854061 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

None. This was a pilot project and it has worked out.

View full review »
it_user774150 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer

I have used traditional storage on much smaller scales: ZFS, SVM, VxVM, and NetApp. They do not fit the use case and demands of a growing Cloud infrastructure.

View full review »
it_user860847 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Engineer at a marketing services firm with 51-200 employees

I have used many solutions but not as extensively as Ceph. I switched to Ceph because of its architecture and because it is a one-stop shop when it comes to storage.

View full review »
FC
Senior Information Technology Specialist at a tech consulting company with 501-1,000 employees

We had no previous solution. My first contact with ephemeral storage is through Ceph.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Dell Technologies, LizardFS and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: March 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.