Stability in a normal operating environment is satisfactory. Improvements would come from providing better data re-balancing algorithms when the storage cluster is expanded. Currently, cluster expansion is a user impacting process.

We have not encountered any stability issues for the product.

There is high stability and I would give that a nine out of ten.

The solution is pretty stable. I'd rate the reliability seven out of ten. 

Red Hat Ceph Storage is a stable product. We've deployed it twice and we didn't have problems from it.

Red Hat Ceph Storage is a reliable solution, it works well.

The solution is stable. 

Red Hat Ceph Storage is stable. 

I would rate stability a nine out of ten. 

I used it for about two years. We had no service interruption and no loss of data.

The system needs some polishing to be stable enough for a production environment.

It has provided retention of all customer sites on which it has been installed in the last three years, with no catastrophic failures so far.

Ceph is more stable than many proprietary solutions.

This is a very stable system, and I see very linear performance growth over expansions, so I'm more or less happy with it.

I have encountered issues with stability when replication factor was not 3, which is the default and recommended value. Go below 3 and problems will arise.

No current issues. Almost all our difficulties were related to implementation. After that, everything ran well.

Latency increases abruptly when conducting recovery. This impacts the upper application.

No stability issues.

The solution has been quite stable for us.

The tool has the best stability. It is reliable. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.