Red Hat Gluster Storage Other Advice

Sebastian Baszczyj - PeerSpot reviewer
Open Source Architect at Insentra

The performance depends on how the tool is implemented. Many customers were implementing the cluster on top of virtual machines. We do not know whether the performance issues were with the virtualized storage or something else. I implement the solution for customers.

My recommendation would depend on the requirements of an organization. The tool can be used for everything. It will be perfect for searching logs and files. However, the product will not be suitable for databases. I would recommend running high-performance applications for databases on top of the solution. For the ease of implementation and usability, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

View full review »
JS
Linux System Engineer at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Try it, but be careful. Also, look into other vendors.

Most important criteria when selecting a vendor: We like to use vendors that we already use.

View full review »
OG
System Administrator at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

I would rate this product a seven out of 10. 

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, IBM, LizardFS and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.