RHEV Room for Improvement

Prakahsrao Jagarou
Associate Principal at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
There are two things that I would like to see improvement in when it comes to Red Hat. First is the pricing and second is the support. Of those two, I think support should be the main focus. We are facing some challenges within Malaysia because we do not really have system integrators for Red Hat available who can provide on-site support. This would be useful in critical situations such as outages. At those times, it would be optimal to have an expert technician who has significant experience with the product on the company site to help us more quickly resolve these critical issues. The closest that we have come to this within Malaysia was an instance where we had to join an online conference call. It was complicated and inefficient. We had to bridge the connection with the principals, login, and then to check and to dump the data for the troubleshooting purposes. If Red Hat can expand their services to include physical support within Malaysia then it would be great for us. We need to have access to immediate support of this type when it comes to critical issues. View full review »
YOUNISAL BADAWI
IT Infrastructure and Systems Lead with 201-500 employees
I heard that there are big differences between Red Hat 8 and 7, but it's still quite difficult for me to judge it. I found it a bit more difficult to manage than version seven, which was much easier. In terms of features, though, it is still not yet clear which is better. I have no clear idea of which features need to be changed at the moment. View full review »
reviewer768786
IT Consultant at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
There has to be more effort into closing the security vulnerabilities in this solution because we are facing daily attacks. We would like to have this done faster. We would like to see live-patching on the systems, without having to require a reboot. It would be better to have more patches, especially kernel-level updates, live and online so that we can keep the business up and running during this period. Improvements can be made to managing this solution, such as enhancements to the GUI. There should be better integration with third-party tools. Tools for scanning the hardware, such as the CPU and memory, would make life easier. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, VMware, Proxmox and others in Server Virtualization Software. Updated: March 2020.
406,070 professionals have used our research since 2012.
DaveChapman
Business Support Officer at a legal firm with 51-200 employees
Realistically, I found Red Hat to be fairly usable. It was an easy transition from Unix to using Linux and I can't think of any real improvements necessary. If anything, I actually like check config better than system CTL. For improvements or additional features, it would be nice for it to integrate better into two in ones. If you wanted to go to the desktop computer side of things, it lags behind in that you need to go to something like Fedora to get all the extra bells and whistles. View full review »
Prakahsrao Jagarou
Associate Principal at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
The pricing could be improved. The support is tricky in a few places. We're facing some challenges within Malaysia where we don't really have the system integrators available who can provide extended support. When we need personnel on-site, we can't get them. Instead, we have to join in an online conference call and then bridge the connection with the principals, log in and then check and dump the data for troubleshooting purposes, etc. View full review »
reviewer1281042
Unix Linux System Administrator at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
The interface is a bit complex, in my opinion. They should work to simplify it if possible. Currently, we cannot get a direct local resource mount. When I want to customize the solution, I would like to have a similar operating system resource included, similar to what VMware offers. We'd like to have the same hosting features VMware has. View full review »
reviewer1255770
Engineer Developer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Configuring the network interfaces is much better in Ubuntu and should be improved. I find this to be the biggest problem. In Ubunto they have the idea of the Netplan, which is much better than the facility in Red Hat. View full review »
reviewer1200555
Head of Solutions Architect Unit at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The GUI interface needs improvement. Not 90%, but 50% or 60% of the work is done from the command line and so on, so the GUI needs work because people are looking for an easier way to manage the environment. Right now, if someone is not very familiar with Red Hat and actually is looking to add Red Hat to the environment, they have to take some training. It needs to be easier to use. The solution could use network virtualization. View full review »
Muhammad Khattab
Infrastructure Consultant at Oriental Weavers
The Administration of the Oracle database and the SAP ERP needs improvement. In the next release. I would like to see some additional features to make it easier, such as improvements to the GUI and the maintenance. The maintenance of Red Hat is difficult. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, VMware, Proxmox and others in Server Virtualization Software. Updated: March 2020.
406,070 professionals have used our research since 2012.