Ruckus Wireless WAN Previous Solutions

Udit Narayan - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Engineer IT Networking at JSW

Before Ruckus, we were using HPE, Aruba, and Cisco.

View full review »
Remigijus Klova - PeerSpot reviewer
Standard Network Operations Team Manager at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I used Fortinet and certain Cisco products. These were primarily geared towards business use, complying with standards. The emphasis was on creating products for larger-scale applications rather than for small-scale use.

View full review »
TK
Technical manager at Djamboree

We considered Extreme, Cisco and Juniper before choosing Ruckus.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Ruckus Wireless WAN
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Ruckus Wireless WAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
LV
Senior Project Manager / Project Director at three6five network solutions

My company decided to work with Ruckus Wireless WAN because of its price and scalability. Its licensing is very uncomplicated compared to Aruba and Cisco where the licensing structure is much more complicated. Ruckus Wireless WAN is easier to work with from a commercial perspective, and it is a very good technology. Ruckus Networks has a very strong R&D department that's constantly coming up with innovations. The product is a market trendsetter rather than a follower. Ruckus Networks also foresee future utilization. The radios on Ruckus Wireless WAN keep on improving and there's this amazing smart team functionality on radios that minimizes end-user connects and disconnects from the network. There's also a smooth handover from one access point to another. Ruckus Wireless WAN is good technology. My company researched technology and commercials, and on the decision matrix, this product came out at the top.

View full review »
AA
Director, Technical Solutions at Sigma.3 Pte Ltd

For the majority of my customers in the hospitality sector, I would continue to choose Ruckus. However, for those engaged in enterprise operations, I can confidently recommend both Ruckus and Aruba. Aruba, especially, makes more sense in an enterprise context due to its comprehensive features and control capabilities.

View full review »
Soubhagya Dash - PeerSpot reviewer
DM IT at NeoliteZKW Lightings Pvt.Ltd.

We are doing a demo with Cambium. Ruckus is much better than Cambium.

I use Ruckus, Cisco, and Netgear. It is a common brand.

View full review »
Awais Tariq - PeerSpot reviewer
Additional Deputy Manager IT (Network and Security) at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees

Cisco is more focused on its branches. Huawei has more customers in telecom operating sectors, such as optical fiber and other devices. Ruckus is the only brand we can test on, with a focus on the app and controls.

View full review »
Mehrdad Sheik - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President, Client Solutions & Services at CHACO INTERNATIONAL INC.

I have used HP before. We switched to Ruckus Wireless WAN, especially for its advanced radio features. I have also used less expensive products. We encountered a lot of field failures using them. For our business model, if we have failures in the field, it is a very expensive product.

View full review »
EmadAttia - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at Oberoi

Before moving to Ruckus Wireless WAN we were using Aruba and Cisco.  We switched because of company standards.

View full review »
Yuvaraj P - PeerSpot reviewer
Network & Security Engineer at Viroka Technology Private Limited

We did previously use a different solution in the past. I cannot recall the name of the company.

View full review »
HK
Head of IT Cluster CEE at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We purchase Ruckus Wireless WAN whenever we have a high percentage of usage, where many people have access points, for example. For countries with lower densities where the wireless WAN is primarily used for business purposes, we use cheaper solutions than Ruckus Wireless WAN.

View full review »
Saad Qaiser - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager (Network Design) at Comstar - Information Systems Associates Ltd.

We also work with Cisco, Huawei, Aruba, and different wireless solutions.

We use Cisco here mainly in the market. Cisco was the leading product in switching and wireless before, or rather, Cisco and Aruba. Aruba is HP, and Aruba is a very strong product. However, when we started doing Ruckus, we grew more satisfied selling Ruckus as the more stable product. With a better product, we win the customer's trust and their businesses.

View full review »
Qaiser Yousaf - PeerSpot reviewer
CIO at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

We did use something in a previous building.

I have some experience with Cisco.

View full review »
LJ
Owner / Chairman of the Board at NoWire Nordic AB

I have used many different kinds of similar solutions to Ruckus Wireless WAN. The one aspect that sets them apart from the other is the quality of the antennas. You can implement and design the networks in a very good fashion.

View full review »
Aqeel Junaid - PeerSpot reviewer
Junior Executive - Information Security at sunshine holdings

I have not used a similar solution to Ruckus Wireless WAN.

View full review »
it_user1255791 - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer/Network Engineer at SevenGate

I have previously worked with Meraki and Aruba. We switched to Ruckus because it's more stable and easier. The technical features are very good and it's very useful if you need a wireless solution, it's very good. A good point about Aruba is that the firewall is better than what Ruckus has. But if you need a wireless solution, Ruckus is very good. 

View full review »
PS
Project Manager at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

We used another solution prior to this one, but we switched because of the radio. That's our biggest concern and why we recommend Ruckus to our customers.

View full review »
MashukThakur - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Wireless Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

I have been in this field for fifteen years. At first, I started with Cisco then to Aruba, and in the last three years, I started working with Ruckus.

I am frequently working with these three products, and as recent as last week, I have started with Fortinet.

View full review »
SR
Head of Corporate Accounts at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

We also provide a Meraki solution to some of our customers. The Meraki is mobile-based, where you just have to press a button on the AP and once the configuration is done, you are connected to the cloud. It is more suitable for a distributed network.

View full review »
RB
Network Engineer at Proactive data systems

I have used Cisco and Aruba.

View full review »
FE
Network Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

I have had experience with a lot of different brands over the past fifteen years.

Ruckus still has some work to do if they want to compete with Aruba and Cisco, except in the case of a high-efficiency access point in high-density areas, which is where Ruckus is the best.

View full review »
EO
Integration Manager at Newcom

Yes, and we decide to change for Ruckus, looking for a improvement in the wifi service

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Ruckus Wireless WAN
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Ruckus Wireless WAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.