Ruckus Wireless WAN Room for Improvement

reviewer925296
Sr. Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Most vendors offer built-in Wi-Fi. So from this point of view, I would like to see built-in Wi-Fi with this solution also, so that we can save money by not having to buy two different components. I would also like to see built-in firewalls. One thing about Ruckus products is that you have documentation based on the scenarios. All the documentation features are explained well, so when you try to figure out some examples or scenarios, you have multiple scenarios and snapshots to follow so that you can build your own setup. I didn't find that kind of documentation with this solution from Ruckus. For the switches perspective as well as the Wi-Fi perspective. The documentation from other vendors like Huawei, Cisco, Aruba are very unique. What they do, is to start with the technology, and then they explain everything to you step by step. Then they give some scenario examples. Another thing that Ruckus lacks, is the certification part. They have very basic online exams but not expert level exams. I would like to be able to do a very professional career-based program with Ruckus. The last thing that needs to improve, is to have direct contact with a support engineer if one has technical issues. View full review »
Uwe Schmidt
Managing Director at SiT Global GmbH
The only issue with the solution is that there is quite a lot of strong competition. It's very difficult to get a government or large public enterprise to buy Ruckus or Aruba over, say, Ubiquiti, which is the standard here. For example, we just lost a Ruckus deal against Ubiquiti. At this stage, there are only minor improvements needed. Overall it's a very good product. View full review »
AbdulrahmanAlshehri
IT Consultant at Asasbin
User access control is done through a third-party, RADIUS, which is not an easy system for IT professionals to use. It is used by larger enterprises, so if you want to deploy on a small to medium scale then you definitely require integration from Microsoft. In the next release, I would like to see better integration with other products. Integration with AirMagnet, the design software, would be good because it takes the layout of a building and positions the access points accordingly, based on the areas and the construction materials. Active integration with AirMagnet would be very useful. There should be support for a local database in the zone directory for people who do not want to use the RADIUS access server. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Ruckus, Ubiquiti Networks, Motorola and others in Wireless WAN. Updated: April 2020.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
YazeedNawafleh
System Engineer/Network Engineer at SevenGate
I can't think of any area that needs improvement. It's an easy product to use, the dashboards and interface are very good. They could include a firewall feature in the next release but even there it's not really necessary because if you have a wireless solution you have a firewall and all the network components. But if I have to come up with something that needs improved, it would be the firewall. View full review »
reviewer367560
Network Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The technical support for this solution needs to be improved. This product needs a point-to-point, bridge solution. The network access controls should be improved. The Cloudpath feature should be improved. View full review »
Abubaker Musa
Information and Communication Technologies Engineer at DIYAR Consultant
I hope that they will be expanding the market. I have some friends who have not heard of Ruckus but are aware of other competitors. They should expand it in the Middle East and other areas and make offers for others to make comparisons. I would like to see more offers for smaller businesses. View full review »
MashukThakur
IT Manager at Fast Telecommunications Company
The pricing needs to be reconsidered because it's expensive. View full review »
reviewer1286451
Corporate Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
It would be nice to some analytical features built into this solution. View full review »
reviewer692691
Project Manager at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Ruckus is not keeping up with the features that some of the competitors have implemented. Compared to other vendors, the analytics has to improve a lot. We would like to see support for different captive portals with the basic solution. The captive portal should be more customizable because right now, it is very limited. You can only change the icon. The market is asking for more improved captive portals. Support for multiple tenants or multiple users with ZoneDirector would be an improvement. View full review »
IbrahimJaber
Senior Engineer at TIC
The overall management of the solution in general needs improvement. The solution could use a better user interface. View full review »
reviewer1008639
Technical Engineer at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
The support could be faster. It takes time for them to reply. I also think the solution should be more user friendly. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Ruckus, Ubiquiti Networks, Motorola and others in Wireless WAN. Updated: April 2020.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.