Safe-T Secure Application Access Other Solutions Considered

it_user790473 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager | Leader | IT | Cyber Security | Cloud | Devops at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We looked at three products before we made the decision that Safe-T fit our needs best. Cisco and CyberArk Solutions were the others. Those were tested and we found they did not fit our needs.

We found the other two product are not so flexible for integrating. We found these products are okay for normal use, for a straightforward implementation. If I want to send secure emails to my customers, and I don't want to integrate it to anything, like an email server, maybe we would have chosen another solution. But the IT environment in financial institutes, it's much more complicated because we have a lot of applications in the environment that are not the standard. So Safe-T was very flexible in the way we could use and integrate it with our system.

View full review »
it_user790539 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Administrator

This is the only option we use. We didn't have another product other than Safe-T. Maybe there are a lot of companies, but I didn't really know them. We are already satisfied by this product. If we weren't satisfied, we would think about another product, but we don't.

View full review »
it_user781407 - PeerSpot reviewer
Solutions Sales VP at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Buyer's Guide
Safe-T Secure Application Access
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Safe-T Secure Application Access. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RP
Technical Support Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

No other products at the time were available. Now, more products are trying to propose the same type of solution, but they are not as efficient as Safe-T, or at least not at the same price range.

View full review »
it_user787734 - PeerSpot reviewer
Infrastructure Manager

We checked CyberArk, but we choose Safe-T. We compared them, but Safe-T is very good for users because it has a plug-in for Outlook. I think it works more easily for users; not as complex as CyberArk.

We choose the product just because of the user interface, and the Outlook.

View full review »
it_user786789 - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO with 201-500 employees

We did evaluate other options. We did have other options but we did not do a PoC of the other products, so I cannot compare them. The decision was made, mostly, based on the price.

I think it brings value for the price. But you should ask again, about two years from now, when our contract will end, or in the three years' time, and then I'll be more informed, but right now it seems worth it.

View full review »
it_user787671 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network and Security Engineer

We did evaluate other options. My manager led that project from the business side, while I'm on the support side. We had some other options, but he chose the Safety because of the price.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Safe-T Secure Application Access
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Safe-T Secure Application Access. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.