The price is expensive.

When comparing available products, such as those on Amazon, it's evident that AWS components are significantly cheaper. This is especially true since our systems run on the AWS cloud, allowing us to receive a greater discount from Amazon and leverage their own products. However, pricing may become a bottleneck in the future, so it's something to keep in mind.

This is a subscription-based licensing model. You can pay monthly or yearly, and there are different tiers. 

Most Fortune 500 companies use it, and they find it to be reasonably priced. They have the marketing budgets that would accommodate this product.

We have standard licensing. I'd rate the affordability six out of ten. It can be a bit expensive. However, it's not too bad as it brings good value. 

On a scale where one is the lowest and ten is the most expensive, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The licensing is usually a yearly subscription. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten, with ten being very expensive. Depending on the package you get, there is a limit to the number of contacts you can have. For example, if you have a million contacts in your package, you start paying for each of those contacts once you exceed a million contacts.

This solution is priced in the medium to high price range. 

Salesforce is an expensive solution. 

Salesforce has different versions of the solution and some are more suitable for smaller clients. However, Salesforce is expensive.

We have two types of licensing. We have a yearly license for end users and we have a concurrent login for selling. 

I'm not sure of the exact costs. That's handled at an organizational level.

We did a yearly license. We negotiated and got a great deal. I don't think we would have gotten far with the regular price, but they negotiated, so it was worth that.

We make educated recommendations about which features would be used to implement our clients' solutions. Our clients engage directly with Marketing Cloud to negotiate licensing costs. In general, the costs are high.

The solution is a bit expensive. I give the cost of the solution a six out of ten.

We need to invest a lot of money upfront for implementation, and there are certain modules, such as Einstein Analytics, which are sold by Salesforce and require extra payment. I am not familiar with all the components of Salesforce, but there is an optional component that requires additional investment.

My company pays to use this solution.

Marketing Cloud is not the cheapest platform. It's probably one of the more highly-priced platforms on the market, but it's the best platform for deals. It's not cheap, which is why I recommend that you use Marketing Cloud to create automated journeys. If you plan to use Marketing Cloud just to send emails, use another tool.

I am unsure of the exact costs. I'm just a user. I don't handle any licensing aspects. 

Know that six months on ingesting data is a minimum requirement. You cannot port six months of data, it must be ingested.

I don't know if my company pays for Salesforce Marketing Cloud monthly or yearly. It's a SaaS, so it's a recurring cost, but I have no information on its price.

It's normal pricing. The pricing is fine.

Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.

The pricing is reasonable. However, it depends on the particular customer. It depends on what their needs are and how much of the product they will use, et cetera.

The pricing can also vary depending on the deployment model.

The solution is paid for monthly.

Salesforce Marketing Cloud is a highly expensive solution, it needs to be less expensive. We are on an annual license to use the solution.

It is a license per user. There could be a minimum limit, but I'm pretty sure it's a per-user license.

Not everything sold is vital, but there are advantages to having items like Journey Builder. The platform is worth the money for big corporations who want to take channel services to a higher level.

The licensing cost for the solution is on a yearly basis. If you are storing documents and you need more storage, it means more pricing or you have to move the storage to other clouds. To clouds such as Microsoft or Amazon.

Our customers purchase the solution so we are not involved with the licensing. 

We do have to pay for a license. We don't have to pay for any extras.

Its licensing is on an annual basis. Customers are okay with its licensing cost, and they don't find it expensive.

Add more features that include both analytics and visualization.