SAP Cloud Platform Room for Improvement
Senior Integration Engeneer at ATOS
Because we have been mostly testing the product and still have limited production implementation experience with it over the past six months, we have not been so heavily involved with Cloud Platform Integration because we mostly continue to use other solutions for current business projects. For that reason, we may not have a complete view of the product as to what needs to be included or improved. However, I am aware that one area that needs to be improved still is business tools integration. Another is the area of product data inserts.View full review »
We would like the ability to create our own flexible data type, directly in the system. This is functionality that is available in the older, on-premises version, but not available on the cloud platform. Our current workaround is to create the definition and import those features. If this functionality were available directly then it would be a big plus because as it is now, it requires a lot of effort.
Better connectivity to on-premise systems would help us to support older systems that are migrating to the cloud. This would give us more confidence in telling clients with old legacy systems that SAP has the capability to handle their landscape.View full review »
This product needs a lot of improvement and should be simplified. It is really clumsy. You need a lot of connections running just to get it working. Even though it is a private cloud, we need a lot of connection speed and resources. I would have preferred something on-premises which would have been very simple. But that is our use case: programming and hosting it on our web solution. And that is all.
I would personally like to see a lot of examples of how to do things with the solution. This is a scalar platform and they are providing some solutions. There are some applications available that you can activate from cloud connectors, et cetera. That is good. But I need to see examples of what some use cases are and I need to be able to build some applications. It is not just about how can I utilize this platform, but there should be step-by-steps. For example, in step one, I need all my connections in place. Well, I also need to know also what kind of connections. Second, I need to know what my data should be. Third, I want to know how I can use a simple auditor. These can be very simple examples for different features. It would be helpful.
If you go to some other platform tool sites, they are loaded with examples and templates, et cetera. I think that part of the presentation of this solution is missing here. It is as if they are saying that even from the start I had to know everything about how the product works before I ever used it. That is frustrating at times. Instead, it is always like a game of trial and error to see if something is working or not. That is time-consuming and very frustrating.
I would like to see more and better support for data transformations. A transformation is able to change data from one format to another format. In the current solution, pivoting data or dealing with multiple levels of transformation is not supported. Those options are missing.View full review »
Responsible for SAP at a pharma/biotech company with 51-200 employees
For our organization, the price is the main downside. They should work to reduce the cost. This specifically affects small companies who would like to use it.
The solution should work to simplify its offering to make it more consumable for users, especially new users.
The solution requires more flexibility overall.
I understand that in the future, they will be offering open source ERP, which will be quite useful.
Divisional Manager at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
We need to connect our ERP solution via the VPN. We need to make sure our ERP solutions aren't exposed to the outside world. Our teams really struggle with this.View full review »
Senior Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
One thing that can be improved is the way the license is set up. If it could be defined by specific types of users then it would be better. For example, if it could be divided into three different sections, one for management who don't require the analytic work, it could be more for viewing. Another could be for the design department, which would require more specific tools, and finally, developers for the architecture. Different types of licenses would be very good.
In the next release, I would like to see improvements with the price and the licensing. We are struggling with our vendors to find out who did the tool implementation.View full review »
Project Manager at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
The functionality of the interface can be difficult. Usability is a challenge most of the time and not being able to get all of the information.
Security, authentification, and logs need to be improved.
In the next release, I would like to see better navigation, better usability, clearness, and better integration with new technologies.View full review »
The source controller needs improvement. There are some disadvantages to it. Versioning also needs improvement.
I would like for it to have integration to GitHub.View full review »