A third party handles implementations with assistance from our team of 40 IT managers. Our team works on the old core system but we are encouraging them to do that only for maintenance. 

The deployment of the solution was done in-house.

We used consultants, project managers, and our team to do the implementation of SAP HANA. The solution is stable and we do not have to do a lot of maintenance.

Our implementation team includes business, functional, and POD consultants.

The major part of the deployment was done internally. However, initially, we did use external consultants. So SAP HANA's deployment was partly internal.

The first step in the deployment process is customization, which involves obtaining the solution according to our requirements, including the data we use and the basic tables it provides. Our bond structure was changed to enterprise bonds so SAP HANA could process it. An IT team worked entirely on the data transformation part to ensure the data from other upstream systems could be processed. After that, we went into the design part, the user acceptance testing, and finally went live.

We invited a third party to do the implementation. 

Our team did the wishlist, the comments, and we shared it with a third party, and this third party came on-site, and they finished the job.

The implementation was carried out in-house, and we also implement the solution for our customers.

We used a partner for the deployment of SAP HANA. 

The vendor takes care of the product's implementation part.

Implementation was completely in-house with a team of around 18 to 22 people and a couple of people from SAP, who looked at the overall program management level, providing guidance plus certifying that best practices were being followed and implemented. 

The deployment, moving from Oracle to SAP HANA, took around eight months

The deployment took two months to implement.

We used an in-house team.

We used an in-house team for the deployment.

We handled the implementation ourselves.

We used an external team.

I'm a business consultant. I do implementations for various parts of my customers' organizations.

We used an in-house team to do the implementation.

SAP itself assisted us with deployment.

While I was not personally involved in the installation, my engineers were. 

My deployment and maintenance team comprises around seven people, although I could not tell you which percentage of this is made up of managers, administrators and engineers. 

We deployed with the help of a vendor.

No real maintenance is required. Data volume management is needed and all the reports are available, based on which the maintenance is easy. 

We used an integrator for the implementation of the solution and we were satisfied.

We have a team of about 200 consultants who implement, deploy, and maintain solutions such as this one.

We hired a consulting firm in Turkey to set up our solution. The two machines were configured by SAP Turkey.

We utilized around 30 technical and functional staff because we were leaving our legacy system behind and migrating to a new one. 

We are an integrator, so we handle the installation for clients.

We had specialists from OEM that took care of everything for us. We also had consultants from Cisco. They gave us initial assemblers until everything was scaled properly. 

We used a partner for the implementation. We had mixed feelings about our experience with them. It wasn't bad. It wasn't exceptionally good.

We had assistance from an SAP partner for deployment.