The stability is the same for any number of users, from one to a hundred thousand. It's a cloud product, so it doesn't differentiate.

Once configured, the processes simply work.

It is a stable platform. I rate the stability an eight.

I think HCM was the most stable for me, but it's because I had experience with it. If I do two or three more implementations and you have to ask me the same question regarding its stability, I would give a different answer.

The stability of SAP HCM is good.

Stability-wise, the platform works well.

A survey within our corporation describes HCM as a stable solution.

The solution is stable. Recently, the localization versions for different countries were increased, and that added value to the solution. We work in Egypt and we spent a lot of time working with the international version until the localized version was released, so it's a plus to have increased localization of the product.

I don't always find SAP HCM to be stable. Sometimes we encounter issues that we thought were resolved, but they resurface. It may be due to our configuration, but we do experience these issues from time to time.

We have never faced any stability issues with SAP HCM. We have an on-premises system and never faced any server issues or technical glitches.

Oracle HCM is stable; I rate it a seven out of ten. 

The solution is stable.

It is a pretty stable solution.

I rate SAP HCM 10 out of 10. 

SAP HCM is stable.

It is quite stable because we run it on the IBM AIX platform, which is quite powerful. The CPU allocation is maintained by us. We use the DB2 database. In terms of power, machine performance, and availability, it is quite stable.

This solution is stable. 

It is a stable solution. I would rate it a nine out of ten.

The solution is stable.

No stability issues.

The system has demonstrated high stability over the years, with no significant downsizing periods.

SAP HCM is a stable solution.

I have no issues with the stability of SAP HCM.

The stability was nice.

I think it's extremely stable. That's one of the reasons why we like it so much. I've had some problems, as it has jammed up on me before.

Generally speaking, I think it's exceptionally reliable. The glitches that I've encountered may have been due to a user error, because it's not so user-friendly and it's not so intuitive.

We have never had any issues with the stability. We have no complaints as users and I have never heard any complaints from my customers.  

The solution is stable.

The current on-prem solution is not that stable anymore because there is so much more work that the cloud offering has and you cannot do that with an on-prem solution. Very soon everybody is going to have to move to the cloud. 

I believe that the on-prem solution is going to have to phase out. SAP is focusing now on the cloud solution. And that's the reason why I feel obscure on Employee Central.

I have not encountered any stability issues so far.

The stability of the solution is pretty good overall. It's reliable and the performance is good. It doesn't crash or freeze. There are no bugs or glitches. It's good.

That said, stability is an area that can be constantly improved upon.

I wouldn't say so. We, as a company, experience regular problems with it.

I did have some issues with stability, especially at the beginning. I had several issues regarding the Time Management and Payroll modules.

The solution is very stable. I've never faced any issues in unpredictability.

No.

This is a stable product.

Some during the first years, but nothing blocking.

I have never encountered any stability issues.

The stability of the solution is good.

SAP HCM is stable.

The solution isn't too stable.