We also use SAP S/4HANA, a business suite product from SAP. It enables financial, controlling, and material management.

I have previously used other solutions, such as Oracle.

We are using Workday. It works better regarding certain analytics features in integral databases than SAP HCM.

We use SAP SuccessFactors for recruitment and performance marketing. 

I am also using SuccessFactors. SAP HCM has got talent management, but it is not as detailed as in SuccessFactors. In terms of HR management, SAP HCM has got more features and more details than SuccessFactors.

We were thinking of switching to a SuccessFactors solution. Due to some cloud issues there, we are sticking to the on-premise model for HCM

We did not use a previous solution.

Our organization transitioned from Oracle TIN to SAP HCM due to SAP's superiority in providing comprehensive business solutions. While I focused on web development using Java and C++, the comparison revealed that Oracle lacked integration with our department. SAP's ERP system, serving as the main system for the entire organization, offered superior integration across departments compared to Oracle. 

The decision to switch was driven by SAP's cohesive solutions, superior functionalities, and overall package, addressing the limitations we faced with Oracle's inability to seamlessly connect different facets of our operations. The move to SAP HCM aligned better with our organization's objectives for an integrated and comprehensive ERP system.

We are currently in the process of migrating to Workday, which is more user-friendly.

The two solutions are similar; Workday has improved on some of the things that SAP can do, whereas SAP can do some things more efficiently. Also, SAP can do some things that Workday cannot. One example is the address formatting. For example, in India, the format of addresses is different than in the US and some other countries. We have had challenges mapping the addresses to Workday from SAP.

With Workday, you do not need to be a program developer.

I have used other solutions including Resourcelink and Agresso, and the differences between them depend on what the clients are looking for. For example, I have dealt with clients who are moving from SAP to Itron, and other clients moving from Itron to SAP.

PeopleSoft. We switched due to a move to global single instance across HR, Finance, Supply Chain and Project Management.

I did not previously use a different solution; I have always been associated with SAP.

Not a different solution, but previously HCM was all decentralized and in some countries, manual. The goal was to bring all the countries/employees into one system.

While we are currently using SAP HCM, we are in the process of scrapping it and moving over to SAP SuccessFactors.

We previously used a different solution; we switched due to potential Y2K risks.

I have always worked with only SAP from the beginning.

I have previously used Workday, Oracle AME, and SuccessFactors.

SuccessFactors was very complex to use for the public sector.

We did not work with other products prior to going with the solution.