Certain areas that provide users with an exact focus on where process transformations can happen are available in Silico but not in SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. The aforementioned reason can be considered for improvement.

The product doesn't allow me to focus on a particular value stream and how the value stream performs. I wish the future releases of the product possess the aforementioned capabilities since only Silico has such capabilities right now, while Signavio and Celonis fail to offer Silico's capabilities.

The area that could be improved in SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is its Journey modeling feature.

It's a tool that works best with SAP. If you're trying to connect any other source system to that other than SAP, then it is difficult. It doesn’t integrate well with other systems.

It could be more scalable.

It could be more stable.

Technical support needs to be improved.

The challenge for a solution that utilizes modeling notations, is that the look and feel
of the models (e.g. in BPMN) is pre-defined. To lead a successful Process
Management initiative, I need the solution to look and feel great. I like the new
feature of Navigation Maps a lot. But Signavio should take this approach further, to
allow me to easily create an environment for our people that they want to use on a
daily basis.

The product needs improvement for out-of-the-box features. It should be able to convert business workflows into media documents quickly. The process of finding dependencies and flagging them could be better.

They should add the feature of exporting PDFs. There could be AI-related features to integrate multiple tools.

When it comes to Signavio, as I've worked on Celonis, I've observed two things in Celonis and Signavio. In Celonis, using the process mining tool, we can implement automation skills. So we can take actions to improve the process as well. That is one thing. 

And one more thing is you can do dashboarding using Celonis, which is not possible in Signavio. So, there's not as much access to features in Signavio as we have with Celonis. We may not have any significant features there.

So, these two features could be added: dashboarding and automation skills.

SAP has to figure out a better way to price it. Their licensing structure isn't ideal as it's based on data; therefore, it's hard to estimate client costs.

The fact that SAP sold Celonis before buying Signavio is another issue I find with clients. They're using Signavio Mining and saying, "Why should I move to Intelligence?" SAP needs to figure that out also.

There could be more standard interfaces for importing data from the various systems in the process landscape. 

Signavio is currently still focusing on the company's internal business processes. Looking to the future, it would be desirable to be able to conduct process mining not only within my E2E business processes but also across the entire supply chain. Knowing that not all parameters are given, Signavio offers the chance to take this elementary step in the network economy. 

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence slows down when you feed a lot of data. It needs to improve its processing ability. The tool should also incorporate AI features that can automate things. Many of the competitors have this feature. 

I would like to see a better version of the solution.

The solution is a good one but could be improved by making the interface more user friendly. 

Additional features are difficult to suggest because each customer has specific requirements so there is really nothing to suggest that would cover all potential clients. 

It could be made slightly simpler and easier, a bit more business user-oriented, and some automation and intelligence built into the process mapping would be really good to see as well.