Securonix Security Analytics Alternatives and Competitors

Get our free report covering Splunk, Exabeam, IBM, and other competitors of Securonix Security Analytics. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Read reviews of Securonix Security Analytics alternatives and competitors

reviewer1041465
Program Coordinator at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
May 13, 2020
Good at security logging in our infrastructure but be prepared for problems if you start with a large implementation

Pros and Cons

  • "The user interface and the timelines they use are the most valuable features. The price model is very simple so that one can understand it easily and there are no surprises within it."
  • "We had a large volume right from the beginning and they weren't quite prepared for that. That's something that they should think about when it comes to customers that have a large volume to start off with."

What other advice do I have?

We reviewed four different vendors but before we did the evaluation, we took a deep look at our use cases to understand our requirements so we would know the expected use cases and requirements on the system. It's important to know what you want to use it for. For us, it was about security use cases. If you are a new customer, you should think of the use cases that you have. All of the vendors we evaluated were good but Exabeam has a very good price model. That's where they win when they compete with Splunk, for instance. With Exabeam, you're not restricted to the log volume. You can add as…
reviewer1427199
Information Security Officer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
MSP
Sep 29, 2020
It is easy to use and deploy, but it lacks proper support

What is our primary use case?

We use McAfee ESM for IT operations and a few security-related things.

Pros and Cons

  • "It is easy to use and deploy. It comes with user-friendly manuals."
  • "McAfee is no more providing security updates on this product, and the enhancements to this product seem to have stopped. Moreover, we don't get proper support, and we struggle to get its support. It would be good if they can add some AI engine and out of the box use cases because it is currently limited to the same scenario and the same setup. I have done a POC for Securonix, LogRhythm. These products are much more ahead as compared to McAfee ESM. They have included multiple modules in the same solution. Correlation is very easy. If McAfee ESM can improve, especially in such implementations, then I believe it would be much better."

What other advice do I have?

We are quite happy with the product and its stability, but the problem is the lack of support, which is one of the major issues that we are facing. I really look forward to them providing proper technical support. I would rate McAfee ESM a seven out of ten.
Get our free report covering Splunk, Exabeam, IBM, and other competitors of Securonix Security Analytics. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.