Selenium HQ Pros and Cons
Selenium HQ Pros
What I like the most about this product is that it gives us a lot of freedom to code anything, there is no restriction on the type of function you can do.
View full review »Ability to integrate with every other tool.
View full review »In general, I would say that the API set is the most valuable feature.
View full review »Learn what your peers think about Selenium HQ. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2020.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
The most valuable aspect of Selenium is that it gives you the flexibility to customize or write your own code, your own features, etc. It's not restricted by licensing.
View full review »The solution is very flexible; there are different ways of using it. It's open-source and has a lot of support on offer.
View full review »I like that it is a robust and free open source. There is a lot of community support available, and there are a lot of developers using them. There's good community support.
View full review »You can build your own framework. I think that's the most powerful feature. You can connect with a lot of other tools that use frameworks, or keywords, etc. That helps make it a stronger solution.
View full review »It supports multiple processes, which is great.
View full review »The testing solution produces the best web applications.
View full review »It is compatible with and supports multiple languages, such as Java and Python. It is open source, and it is widely used.
View full review »Selenium HQ Cons
Selenium is good when the team is really technical because Selenium does less built-in methods. If it came with more built-in and pre-built methods it would be even easier for less technical people to work with it. That's where I think the improvement can be.
View full review »Could have additional readability and abstraction.
View full review »Whenever an object is changed or something is changed in the UI, then we have to refactor the code.
View full review »Learn what your peers think about Selenium HQ. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2020.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
The solution's UI path needs to be modernized.
View full review »The solution does not offer up enough information in regards to personality testing.
View full review »There should be standardized frameworks to build automation.
View full review »The solution is open-source, so everyone relies on the community to assist with troubleshooting and information sharing. If there's a complex issue no one has faced, it may take a while to solve the problem.
View full review »It would be better to have a simplified way to locate and identify web elements.
View full review »Selenium uses a layer-based approach that is somewhat slower than Eggplant when it comes to executing code.
View full review »It is not a licensed tool. The problem with that is that it won't be able to support Windows desktop applications. There is no support for Windows desktop applications. They can do something about it.
Its user interface can also be improved, which is not great compared to the other latest tools.
Anybody who has been working on functional testing or manual testing cannot directly work on Selenium HQ without learning programming skills, which is a disadvantage.
View full review »Learn what your peers think about Selenium HQ. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2020.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.