The solution is extremely scalable. It's super easy to push out to thousands of clients if you really need to. I haven't had any issues. It scales very well.

SentinelOne is highly scalable. I know folks with 10 times the number of endpoints we have, and they're pleased with it. One fellow I know has 4,000 endpoints under management.

We only have one module or solution from them. We haven't tacked on multiples from a scalability side. However, from a licensing side, it's easy to add extra agents, it's easy.

For the most part, SentinelOne Singularity Complete is scalable, but with my company's problem with auto-updates, it just means needing to rely on other tools to get new agents pushed out to the endpoints. It would have been better and more scalable if there was a way to update on the directory.

We started out by having it deployed on a handful of machines as a proof of concept. From there, we were able to replicate it over and over in our environment. We are currently licensed for around 7,000 devices, and they made it pretty clear to us that if we decide to improve that or increase that, it would be a seamless process. They will just bump our licenses up and then we pay a little bit more. There is no real pain associated with that where you have to go back to the table, talk, and do things like that. It is a flip of a switch.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is a scalable solution, which is another reason my company chose it.

It is scalable with the caveat that we have had some challenges within our infrastructure for 20 agents across Linux servers. Beyond that, scalability is not an issue.

8,000 to 9,000 people are using the solution across our entire organization.

We are using SentinelOne as our de facto endpoint protection software. As a result, it is a requirement for every machine in our infrastructure, except for the devices that do not support their agents. So, as our infrastructure continues to grow or shrink, the users of SentinelOne will either increase or decrease, depending on the state of our infrastructure at that specific point in time.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is highly scalable. We have had many clients easily scale their number of endpoints.

We deployed the solution to about 200 endpoints. 

The solution has met all of our scaling requirements.

The solution is very scalable and very easy to scale. 

The scalability is very good. I'd rate it nine out of ten. It can expand well. 

We have about ten people, admins, who are on the solution. 

I would rate the scalability of Singularity Complete eight out of ten.

It seems very scalable. We have not run into any issues. We pushed it over about 2,000 endpoints. It performs the exact same way it has been.

SentinelOne Singularity scaled easily in terms of deployment. We haven't experienced any performance issues, whether it's installed on a higher-end machine or a low-end machine. SentinelOne Singularity has been excellent.

I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

I rate the scalability of Singularity Complete nine out of ten.

It's pretty scalable. There are a few operating systems that we've had issues with. Other than that, everything else has been pretty scalable.

We have not experienced any problems with scalability. We are able to onboard new machines, and within a day or two, we see more data populate for those machines. So far, scaling has been very helpful for us. This is one of the reasons why we wanted to onboard with Singularity Complete, to get that visibility and to get it right away.

It is definitely scalable. You can really expand it and, for us, that is huge. As our organization grows, we will likely look at acquisitions, and, with those acquisitions, we will definitely get the other company's devices deployed through SentinelOne. It will allow us to grow and have their devices in the SentinelOne console as well, and have visibility.

It's very scalable. We are working on a special project, in which we want to set up a lab for a special event. I talked with our support, and they said we could set up another site. It's really scalable.

We only started using it at the beginning of this year, so the number of users has stayed the same. I have no experience scaling it up, but it's easy to add more devices to the platform. I don't foresee having any problems with scalability.

The tool is very scalable. If we use all of our agents, it's very easy to ask the vendor to add more agents to our license. They get that taken care of, which is really nice. It's been very easy to change and modify groups as we need to.

Exclusions have been very straightforward. I would love to see the exclusions to look at the machines in a group and inform us when we have exclusions that are not found in the directories on the machines. It will help with the removal of redundant or unused exclusions. It will remove some of that risk.

It is super easy. We have 20,000 endpoints. It was super easy to scale them. We are willing to scale it more. There is no issue with that at all.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is easily scalable.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is scalable.

I would rate the scalability of SentinelOne Singularity Complete an eight out of ten.

Singularity Complete is scalable. We have 2,500 endpoints. I know other organizations that have over 70,000 endpoints.

I would rate the scalability of Singularity Complete a nine out of ten.

I don't have any issues with the console scaling. When I logged in earlier today, SentinelOne performed a complete site upgrade in the background, and I didn't even notice it. Scalability is also not a problem with agent inflation in my company. I have been able to deploy agents without any trouble. Initially, there was a minimum purchase requirement, which was slightly higher than our install base's cost. However, I was comfortable with purchasing the additional licenses. Therefore, if we do experience growth, licensing won't be an issue. I want to ensure that we remain within the appropriate range for that.

I have been informed that even if we experience a sudden surge in growth among our customers and we continue scaling and deploying agents, we will catch up with the licensing costs beyond our initial purchase price within the year. So, I am confident that they can scale effectively. Although my installation is relatively small in comparison to some larger organizations I've worked with in the past, I am aware that these products can scale to accommodate thousands of devices. I have full confidence that if we were to experience explosive growth within our company, I would be able to manage it without any issues.

The solution is highly scalable. I give the scalability a ten out of ten.

Its scalability is excellent.

We have not hit the top end. We are probably running 10,000 agents and have not seen any degradation in the portal.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is scalable to our infrastructure and endpoints. Once we figured out the deployment hurdle for Windows and Mac, we were able to push it out to all of our endpoints without any problems. I can break out devices into different sites and groups, and some of those groups can be dynamic. For example, if I'm looking for a Mac computer versus a Windows computer, I can just click on the group and see all of them there. I can also add tags for anything, such as the OS version or if the person might be a specific risk. These are non-relational attributes and values that we can set, so we can define whatever schema we want. It's fantastic.

We have almost 3,000 endpoints. We have a spike of 500 to 600 endpoints in the summer to December season. We are primarily Windows and also have about 200 Linux endpoints. They are all deployed across the same organization. 

Scaling is flexible. They do a really good job.

I would rate the scalability of Singularity Complete ten out of ten.

They would far outpace the scale of what we would be looking at.

For my company's use, SentinelOne Singularity Complete is great and has no issues scalability-wise.

Singularity Complete is scalable.

It scales very well.

One of the features that we love about SentinelOne is that we don't have to buy licenses ahead of time. It just scales up as we grow. We're bringing on a client now that has 500 endpoints and I don't have to worry about contacting sales at SentinelOne and getting a PO for 500 licenses. It just scales up and we're charged based on what we use, which is awesome.

The solution is on 100 percent of our clients that we manage, and that's going to be the goal moving forward. Our sales team does not put in a contract without SentinelOne.

I would rate its scalability abilities nine out of ten.

It is very scalable. Most of the software that is on-demand is scalable.

We have about 350 licenses for the solution right now. If the company grows, we will increase usage. 

SentinelOne's scalability is very good. The solution is very flexible. 

It is highly scalable. It is just a case of purchasing more licensing and deploying agents.

We have three global admins, myself included, with about 10 other administrators. Primarily, the way that we are structured is we have a client team and a server team. So, we have resources from each geographical region who have access to the solution to police their own environment on a geographical basis. So, we have three global admins, then everybody else just has a sort of SoC-based level functionality, which goes back to the custom role issue because this is too much access. 

I would rate the scalability of Singularity Complete a seven out of ten because of the integrations they have with third-party groups.

We do not have it in any cloud. The agent is located on devices; we manage almost 10,000 computers. Our company has a presence in nine European countries, and SentinelOne is used in all of them. Our department is the group that supervises all regions, including Spain, France, the Nordic countries, Poland, Romania, the Czech Republic, Austria, and Switzerland.

We are continually deploying new agents because we detect more and more devices. SentinelOne will stay in our company until it dies, so to speak. With what it has cost us to get here, we will not change now.

Its scalability is pretty good. 

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Complete's scalability an eight out of ten.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is scalable.

The solution is deployed across 2,000 machines in four properties. 

It can scale well. We keep deploying it further and it works. 

It is a scalable solution, and we have about 800 users using SentinelOne. We only need one person for maintenance, and they can offer maintenance in person and remotely via email and SMS.

It is scalable, and it has scaled well.

Scaling is easy. It's not hard to expand it at this point.

It is very scalable. We have doubled the number of licenses or agents we have had in the last three years, and we have not had any issues.

We use the solution in endpoints in different departments across the organization. The tool does not require maintenance. We can auto-update it from SentinelOne Management Console. We can push the auto-update agent from the console. I rate the solution's scalability 9 out of 10.

We haven't tried to scale the tool yet, but the solution will be scalable after we increase our license.

Singularity Complete is extremely scalable.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is scalable.

Singularity is scalable. We haven't had any issues so far. We have no plans to increase usage right now. If the number of users increases, we'll look at it. 

We have 1500 users on the solution right now. It is pretty scalable. 

We have a 100% adoption rate. We've used all of our licenses. But we are trying to get more licenses so that we can cover our labs and other places like that. We did not have the budget at the time to cover everything we wanted to cover.

We do have plans to increase usage. It's done a fantastic job. And so every time we can, we do add more licenses to it with the end goal of actually covering not only our faculty, staff, and workstations, but also all of our labs.

There are 1,823 users online right now out of 2,750. In addition to myself, there are three other individuals who have administrative privileges and there are other members of the security department in the event I'm not here or I'm on vacation, they can fill in that role. Our IT assistant manager has read access to it so he can see in there, access the API, and can actually incorporate SentinelOne data into ServiceNow. SentinelOne has a very robust API, so if you're into programming or integrating it into other systems, you can do that.

It has phenomenal scalability. It can be used as just a small business or it can operate on hundreds of thousands of devices in a single enterprise.

We don't lose any functionality by its scaling at all.

We started with about 50 endpoints and now we have over 300. We haven't had a problem with it.

There will be more servers to watch over so our usage will be increasing. When the business grows, our IT will grow with it, and SentinelOne has to grow along with us.

The product is on a cloud-hosted instance. It can be integrated into everything that we use. It seems highly scalable.

It is quite scalable. I do not see anything holding it back in that regard.

Pretty much everybody in the company uses the solution. We have 1,300 deployed agents and ten administrators. 

The solution is absolutely scalable. 

The scalability is a nine out of 10.

Singularity is highly scalable. We can easily cover all our machines with it. 

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is scalable.

The product can scale. However, it depends on the license. 

We have 500 users on the solution right now.

Right now, we don't have plans to increase usage as we already have some buffer limit there.

Singularity's scalability is good. 

It can be extended in the cloud, so the scalability is a 9 out of ten.

Scaling should be pretty easy. You just push out the agent. That's it. There's a group policy on the web portal and there's not much to manage. 

As a growing company, I'm glad that the SentinelOne Singularity Complete portal will show more and more devices, but I'm not particularly concerned about that because I've paid for Vigilance service. I'm confident that we're covered no matter how many threats or issues arise.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is scalable.

We don't possess as many endpoints in comparison to, I suppose, other companies and universities. However, I believe that if we were to double them today, scaling Singularity Complete would become quite effortless.

We have never had an issue with scalability.

We have 15,447 endpoints in total with the Core version. 99.99 percent of the endpoint usage is Windows. We also use it with a few Macs and Linux. It is really powerful from this point of view.

I rate Singularity Complete 9 out of 10 for scalability. 

The solution scales well and can work across platforms. We can use it with MacOS, Linux, and Windows Servers. You can use it with everything.

We have 600 people on the solution right now. It is used throughout the company.

We may increase usage in our company. 

It is scalable. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of scalability. We have more than 1,200 users who are using this solution.

Singularity Complete can scale easily. 

Singularity Complete is scalable.

The solution is very easy to scale. Scalability is the best and the GUI itself is very fast with no issues. A customer with 10,000 clients still gets fast responses. 

Our organization has close to 3,000 machines with approximately 2,000 users. It is easy to scale.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is a scalable solution, which is one of the reasons why my company uses it.

Right now, we have 54 analysts managing approximately 300,000 endpoints at any one time, globally. We operate 24/7 using SentinelOne.

In the beginning, I saw that Deep Visibility was really fast. Then, with more and more agents reporting their daily work to the console at SentinelOne, I noticed a decrease of response time with the console. But what's really great is that they updated the console rapidly and the response time got better and better. Now I like the response time. There are ups and downs in the console response times, and in how fast the agents are reporting, but I have the feeling that SentinelOne monitors that and reacts if it gets too slow. Of course it's a trade off for SentinelOne between response times and costs. But right, it's more than we need.

In terms of expanding our usage, there's another very interesting product called Ranger. Right now we feel it's too expensive, but it might be interesting in the next two or three years. For now, we just want to finish our rollout.

So far, the scalability is going really well. It's really lightweight. Using the console, you can break it up into regions. It's integrated with Active Directory and we have it set up as the "research lab" in Melville, New York and something else in China.

Right now, it's our product of choice for endpoint protection. I suspect our usage will grow a lot once they enable the IoT; what they call Ranger.

I rate Singularity Complete nine out of 10. 

I would rate it a ten out of ten in terms of scalability, especially because we have Ranger deployed. If we need to or if we have a merger, we can get them to put SentinelOne on a couple of devices for us and give us creds so that we can deploy to the rest from there in case they cannot get us in the SCCM or whatever else they are using.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is scalable. The number of agents available on our endpoints is based on our license.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is scalable. To scale, we simply need to install agents, and the rest is taken care of by SentinelOne.

I would give it an A-plus for scalability as well.

We have about 400 endpoints. They are all deployed in one location.

It is a scalable product. If we need to add more endpoints, we can. That said, we have yet to scale. 

The solution is scalable. 

It's scalable. We are using management software on the cloud. Therefore, if we want to install 1,000 agents, it doesn't impact our business now. We can scale and it's got a central implementation method for agents.

I would rate the scalability of SentinelOne Singularity Complete nine out of ten. I have not encountered any issues when deploying for our clients.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is highly scalable.

You can certainly have thousands of SentinelOne users. We have 250 users. In terms of our plans to increase its usage, I provide IT as a service. So, as I add clients, I always add licenses for those clients.

Scalability is based on the measure. There is no limitation regarding scalability if you pay for the upgrades.

The product can scale very well. 

We have less than 50 people on the solution currently. We are using it in a smaller environment.

We do have plans to increase usage in the future. We are, in fact, still deploying it. So the department is not finished yet.

The scalability of SentinelOne is good, but my biggest concern is they need to find some way to automatically install their agents to specifically Microsoft Windows devices because not every IT infrastructure has SECM of others that automatically deploy it. It would be helpful during the migration of new customers.

We have approximately 4,000 systems using the solution and plan on adding another 400.

We have implemented this product for companies ranging from 10 to 200 endpoints, with many hundreds of users and it has been fine with this volume. 

The tool's scalability is average.

Yes, it is scalable.

As far as I know, it is easily scalable.

We have not run into problems with scalability. It can be very good.

There are three users in the company including the IT department, helpdesk, and operations manager. At the moment, we have implemented 100% of our endpoints. Probably, as we add endpoints over time, our usage will increase slightly.

We have a large environment and find SentinelOne Singularity Complete to be scalable to meet our requirements.

It is extremely scalable.

You can scale the solution. However, you do have to pay more to expand as you need to purchase more licenses. At this point, we get additional blocks of licenses when we need them. We do not upgrade one license at a time. 

We have about 5,000 clients on the solution currently.

It is a scalable solution. Everyone is using this solution in our organization, with almost 2000 users. It's mandatory for us to install this EDR solution on all the inputs.

SentinelOne is scalable, but we need to purchase additional licenses. We have purchased two licenses for 300 endpoints. The license not only applies to the users but also to some of the servers. We have SentinelOne installed on some of our critical servers. It can be scaled to whatever size we want if we purchase enough licenses.

The scalability of SentinelOne is much better than other tools, so it's a ten for me, scalability-wise.

The solution scales well. You can expand it as needed. 

We are a small organization and have around 200 to 250 people on the solution. 

I haven't seen all the features. However, I will probably start looking at it since it has saved us from a couple of cyber attacks. Probably I will take a walk-through again from the technical team to understand if there are any further scalable options to implement on my infrastructure.

We are using it for service only right now. However, we have decided to scale up for all the end users.

Scalability is great if you're scaling up, but scaling down may prove to be challenging.

The solution is scalable.

The scalability has been very good.

There are thousands of both users and servers. Everyone uses it.

It is very scalable and easy to deploy over any of the standard management solutions.

We have approximately 1,000 people using this solution. We have plans to increase our usage.

The scalability of SentinelOne Singularity Complete is great.

This solution is currently being used by only two people. Myself and one of my teammates.

Within the cloud, the solution is as scalable as required. The CapEX is quite low and you can scale this solution for thousands of users. 

The scalability is driven by demand. If I need to buy 100 licenses, I can buy 100 licenses. We started with 50 and now we have 200 on-premises and 100 on the cloud.

In terms of expanding our usage, we have a SCADA network. It is our operational network. That network is 100 percent disconnected from the outside world. It's not connected to any network, not to IT and not to the internet. We use a regular antivirus there. We plan on deploying SentinelOne to support that and to remove the old antivirus.

The scalability is excellent, with a high degree of flexibility and ease.

This is a scalable solution.

The solution is scalable and can use the facility to do the same license, which could be used for Kubernetes. So it is the same license but different scales which we have utilized. Approximately 1,000 users are using the solution.

SentinelOne is a scalable solution. We have some 300 people using it in our organization and plan to increase usage as the company grows. Every machine we roll out gets that product.

We have approximately 250 users using this solution in my organization.

The solution is scalable. I'm able to put it both in a script and I can see it being able to be deployed in a large environment as well as a small one. I have 285 end points and the roles are anywhere from financial traders to insurance agents. All employees have access to the solution, it's actually turned into my main route for antivirus end protection and the product doesn't require any maintenance except for when it finds a virus.

The product is scalable. 

The product is actually scalable.

Our customers are small, medium, and enterprise companies. We support all of them, both small and medium enterprising arms.

The scale we operate at is pretty small. We've got less than 100 endpoints on this at the moment. Currently, I only have about 80 users. 

We are a relatively small company with about 80 employees. Most things are offsite. We do not use automated things very much.

There are four users from the admin side.

Together with another colleague, we chose SentinelOne, then tested and deployed it. A few other colleagues have monitoring views in SentinelOne, e.g., if a site has to be whitelisted. 

The scalability is good. At present, I can't see scalability limits.

We have SentinelOne installed on almost 1,700 endpoints and have one main admin for deployment and maintenance and about 20 local site admins.

We have some factories and branch offices where the solution is not yet installed. We hope to complete most of them by the end of this year and, by then, have it installed on about 2,300 endpoints.

The solution is scalable. You can pretty much deploy to anywhere.

We use the Cloud. It's completely scalable. They use a management console for lots of companies. It's tremendously scalable, it can be used with hundreds of thousands of computers.

Right now, we protect only 100 endpoints, it's for highly critical systems. Before the COVID crisis, we had plans to increase usage. We need to renew at the end of the year. We will for sure renew for 100 endpoints. I'm not sure about expanding though.

We don't need to do anything related to updating service backend sites. For agents, we only need to click "select all" and "run update," that's it. It only requires one person for maintenance, to see events and analyst information, technology, etc. It has access for three people who are security engineers and our CSO.

It's scalable. We don't have any plans to increase usage. 

The solution is quite scalable.

The solution is scalable, we have around 500 users in the company. 

The scalability is excellent.

This solution is scalable and expandable with no issues.

It is definitely scalable. We have around eight to ten thousand servers.

I rate the solution's scalability a four out of five. 

It appears to be scalable.

SentinelOne is easy to scale.

The scalability of SentinelOne is not a problem. These solutions can easily host up to 10,000 endpoints if not more, and we have 500. We do not have an immediate need to scale, but it is not an issue. As the company grows, the company will increase the usage of the solution.

Given the way the solution works, I see no issues at all with scalability — both in the number of users or incidents as well as the degree of sophistication of the attacks.

There are no problems with scalability, I could say that the product is easily scalable, since it is not limited to a physical server.

None.

Out of ten, I would give this solution 8.5 for scalability.

SentinelOne is scalable.

It is a scalable solution.

There is high scalability currently. We have around two hundred individuals in the organization.

SentinelOne is a scalable solution.

It is scalable.

SentinelOne is scalable.

We have approximately 300 users using this solution.

No.

It's hard to give an impression on the stability at this time. We haven't used it on a large scale yet. We're still testing.

In my organization, we are planning to deploy some 30,000 agents. I would say that it's scalable. I don't see any problem with scalability.