We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

ServiceNow IT Operations Management Competitors and Alternatives

Get our free report covering Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Moogsoft, OpsRamp, and other competitors of ServiceNow IT Operations Management. Updated: November 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Read reviews of ServiceNow IT Operations Management competitors and alternatives

Cesar Quiroz
CIO at Grupo Kasto
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Easy to use and implement with a good user interface

Pros and Cons

  • "The overall functionality of the product is excellent."
  • "The product should look at BCM or ServiceNow and see if there are features that would make nice additions. It would help them stay competitive."

What is our primary use case?

We're primarily using the solution for incident management. We use it for ticketing for end-users. We are using also all the functionality around change management, release management, and this year we implement project management and software license management. We also make use of the analytics.

What is most valuable?

The analytics are very good.

The solution offers very nice incident management.

The overall functionality of the product is excellent.

The change management is helpful. They have an agent that we installed in every single asset. We have the inventory for all assets automatically.

Contract management is very valuable for us as an IT department, as we have the information for every single computer across the company.  

We are starting to use the project management aspects right now. We have different projects and we have all information in the same solution, in the same place. It makes everything more centralized and easier to access. 

The user interface is very nice and the solution is easy to use. You don't need to be an expert in order to navigate around and use the product. You don't need to read a lot of manuals in order to figure everything out. It's pretty intuitive.

What needs improvement?

While we're just starting with project management, I foresee some limitations with it two or three years down the line. The functionality we will likely need just isn't there right now. It's still very, very basic in terms of the offering.

For example, measuring progress can be tricky. If you finish the sub-tasks and not the main task, it doesn't calculate the project's progress correctly.

It would be nice if there were some standard KPIs around, for example, performance or support. It would help with budgeting.

The product should look at BCM or ServiceNow and see if there are features that would make nice additions. It would help them stay competitive.

For how long have I used the solution?

We started using the solution 36 months ago. It's probably been close to three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability of the solution is quite good. We don't have crashes. It doesn't freeze. there aren't bugs or glitches. It's reliable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is okay. However, if you have more than 100 or 200 agents how the performance will be.

We had started with five, then with 10, then with 15 and now we have 20 or more. We don't need to report or to ask that they increase the capacity planning or anything of that nature. It was very transparent and so far very easy for us to scale up.

We may increase usage in the future.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support has been very good. Their response times are very fast - faster than other competitors. We haven't really had any big problems with the product at this point. Therefore, we haven't really used them that much. However, we are quite satisfied with the level of service they provide.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

While I haven't used a different solution at this particular company, I have used other solutions in the past, such as BMC and ServiceNow.

Freshservice is more stable and easier to use. It's also less expensive. It may not e as big as other offerings, however, for small and medium-sized organizations, it's quite good.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. It was not overly complex. We didn't run into too many issues.

We constructed everything and handled the setup was in one day. Three days later we had to start with all the functionality and the implementation for the entire company including the change management process, the training, etc. Everything was done in less than one month.

What about the implementation team?

We didn't need a consultant or any type of expert in order to handle the implementation. We handled everything ourselves.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing information is on their website. It's my understanding that their Pro Plan, for example, is around $89/month.

There aren't additional costs on top of this. The price you see on the website is the price they charge and the price you pay.

What other advice do I have?

We're just customers and end-users.

I'm not sure of which version of the solution we are using. They recently changed the names of their services. While we were previously using what I believe was called Enterprise, which is now called Pro.

We may continue to use, not just this solution, but other Freshworks options in the future. We've recently asked the company to put together webinars for our company to learn more about their offerings.

I'd recommend this solution. In fact, I already have - to other CIOs. The pricing is very straightforward, and the solution is easy to use. It's not overly technical.

Overall, I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IB
Managing Director at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Real User
Top 5
A free enterprise monitoring solution

Pros and Cons

  • "It's a very reliable platform and we've never had any issues regarding the scalability or the stability of Zabbix."
  • "Zabbix technical support is sold separately."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case is the cost. Typically speaking, our customers have a plethora of tools and they find it very difficult to manage their business services with a selection of tools. In most cases, they're able to replace all of their tools with one — Zabbix. 

We counsel groups and we recommend using Zabbix — we're a reseller.

We focus on Zabbix. When a customer needs it integrated with Microsoft, or ServiceNow, or other solutions, then we help them out from a consulting perspective. We focus on and we recommend Zabbix. Which is an enterprise monitoring solution.

I take care of sales and marketing.

If the customer requires integration, then there are easy ways of integrating Zabbix with JIRA, ServiceNow, ITSM, and all other sorts of different solutions.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable aspect of this solution is the fact that it is enterprise-level, scalable, and free.

Just being free isn't enough, obviously. You have to be able to respond to a considerable number of enterprise requirements and be secure. Security is part of the enterprise requirements. The fact that Zabbix can offer those things, and it's free, is why our customers choose it.

What needs improvement?

When our customers don't choose to go with Zabbix, it's usually been because they're looking for a solution that also contains mainstream AI, AIOps, if you wish. AIOps is a fully noted marketing buzzword, which can mean all sorts of things for different people. When I use that term, I'm talking about the requirement to analyze in-depth enterprise data. Zabbix is not an analytics platform.

We've never had any issue at all integrating Zabbix with any of the existing enterprise tools, whether it be ITSM, JIRA, or an analytics tool like Splunk — it's never been an issue. Their design team does a very good job allowing people to get access to the Zabbix database and to the Zabbix Schema, which defines the data that's stored in.

In the latest version, which is just about to be deployed, they are adding the capability of doing APM (Application Performance Monitoring). That's a feature that has currently been lacking — we'll have to see how it goes.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Zabbix for one year.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's a very reliable platform and we've never had any issues regarding the scalability or the stability of Zabbix. We've seen customers (not our customers) that have got huge implementations of millions of objects which are being managed. We've never had any issues with scalability.

How are customer service and technical support?

Zabbix is not a licensed software. People don't buy licenses for Zabbix. Technically, we are a reseller. So what is it that we resell from Zabbix? The answer is their service. Either their contractual support, their annuity based support, or their technical support. We can get them involved in certain implementations if the customer requirements require that.

Zabbix technical support is sold separately.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward. It's a powerful tool; it's applicable to many different domains, through networks, through infrastructure, through applications, through containers, virtual resources, and cloud-based applications — it can be applied to all of them. The initial implementation is usually something we never have an issue with. It's a very easy-to-download package. Implementation requires experience. Deploying Zabbix is very easy, but if you don't know what you're doing, you can make an awful mess. That's where and why we offer our consultancy — to help people to make sure that they don't end up with petabytes of monitoring information on the first day. Which of course no one has any time to go through and handle. 

What other advice do I have?

Speak to a Zabbix expert before you get started because there are so many options in terms of architecture for deployment that you really need to understand relating to how Zabbix can give you those options and why they're useful. Options might include encryption or distributed architecture, so delegating monitoring responsibilities close to the objects that have been managed using proxies is a good idea. There are choices to be made so if you don't know the product and you are speaking to someone who does, then listen, because they can advise you properly to get the best benefit out of the software. Zabbix is a free package, you're not paying for any licensed software; the expense of Zabbix over time is related to how it's deployed and used. If you don't deploy it right, then you'll spend more time fixing your mistakes than actually using the software.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Zabbix a rating of eight.

I am not giving them a higher rating because they don't have analytics. They're getting there. They're becoming more and more proactive. They just added something which was very important called 'application performance monitoring'. From an enterprise perspective, they still lack the analytics capabilities, but that's not necessarily an issue unless you're looking to choose one tool that does everything.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
SR
Associate Director at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
An AI-driven tool that provides intelligent monitoring

Pros and Cons

  • "Moogsoft is easily deployable and ready to use."
  • "The documentation and flexibility for generic integration could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

I think they are coming up with advanced features, but what happens is, ServiceNow is being used as an ITS solution. Some of our customers receive repetitive error messages due to a common root cause. With ServiceNow, that doesn't get classified under a single ticket. Rather it comes as multiple error messages. With Moogsoft, we do a clustering around it, and through the initial aggregation to understand this problem, it is solved. Moogsoft reduces excess noise. Hence we wanted to cluster the issues so that when the help desk or the IT administrator or the service administrator is looking at the issue, we have better visibility to look at where it is, and also be able to predict level-two issues and take corrective actions.

I don't know the exact number, but we have quite a few customers using Moogsoft. From my understanding, there are more than one million users, but I could be wrong.

What is most valuable?

So in this particular case, Moogsoft has two things. One is the timeline base, and the other is the issue ticket base. For the timeline basis: different posts on the ticket is what helped us most — from the ML algorithm to classify the tickets and resolve them quickly.

What needs improvement?

Right now, we are integrating it with ServiceNow. There should be a mechanism to project  Moogsoft's tools and applications so that they can run on ServiceNow's alternate site so that it works as one integrated-face. In other words, there needs to be a way to integrate both of them into a single windowpane. There is a plugin, but it's from a visibility standpoint, it's not from a feature standpoint or an elevating standpoint.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have investigated this solution and sold it for just over three months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We haven't tested the scalability enough for me to comment accurately.

How are customer service and technical support?

To be very frank, I really didn't need to go back to the technical team for any help. I could get all the information that I wanted online, from their documentation and everything. It's pretty well-documented and it's readily available.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There are two types of licenses available, but I am unsure of the pricing details.

What other advice do I have?

I would definitely recommend this solution to other interested companies. It's a very good product. When one is wanting to look for a quick solution rather than building it, Moogsoft is easily deployable and ready to use — that's how I feel.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give Moogsoft a rating of seven.

Integration support needs to be scaled up at a much higher pace — the integration with other tools. Also, the documentation and flexibility for generic integration could be improved. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
Get our free report covering Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Moogsoft, OpsRamp, and other competitors of ServiceNow IT Operations Management. Updated: November 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.