For standard functions, we had the help of Microsoft experts. For customer-driven views, there may be a lot of challenges and resources needed to deploy SharePoint's business perspectives. 

I did it myself. For its deployment and maintenance, only one person is required. I take care of its deployment and maintenance.

The implementation was completed in-house.

HP does not seem very knowledgeable about SP2013 social.

We have joint support for the applications and the SharePoint Online version, Microsoft is managing everything from the cloud and we are supporting it at the application level. There are not many resources that are required for their support and maintenance.

We implemented SharePoint in-house. We had a team that had experience with SharePoint when we decided to use it as our content management system. We had the skills from implementation and from attending numerous Microsoft training courses.

We used our in-house support team to deliver the implementation.

Internal deployment of the system was conducted through a Microsoft partner and was very easy. We had our internal professionals deploy the system together.

This was implemented using Vendor as well as an in-house team with the client. A kind of hybrid development team created for application development, product deployment and configuration.

In house.

I've done it both ways, and Microsoft Consulting Services is well equipped to properly implement SharePoint.

Our solution was done in-house.

We used a consultant. He was technical enough to use the plug-ins and integrators that were required. He was a specialist.

We implement through a Microsoft Partner. The expertise was very high.

Vendor and partner.

We implemented SharePoint through our in-house team, because we are a technology company, so we didn't need to use external experts or specialists for the deployment of the platform.