Silk Central Room for Improvement

Giovanni Pistarini
Test Governance at Poste Italiane
We are primarily interested in improving the flexibility to customize parts of the tool. At this point, we feel that the customization is bad. For example, we would like to be able to automatize internal projects. We would like like to see the visibility improved, and want to perform certain tests faster. We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end. This is very important to us. In terms of usability and the interface, a few small improvements can lead to a lot of benefits. The interface is good but can be improved. The section on managing requirements for testing has to be improved. This is an old feature that has not been updated at the same rate as the rest of the tool. View full review »
Cagin Uludamar
Application Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
From a test automation perspective, the main feature missing is the ability to schedule executions with only failed tests. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Zephyr Enterprise, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: September 2019.
366,756 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email