SmartBear TestComplete Competitors and Alternatives

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
305,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Read reviews of SmartBear TestComplete competitors and alternatives
UFT (QTP) Logo
Micro Focus
Patrick Mullarkey
Real User
Software Test Leader with 1,001-5,000 employees
Dec 26 2016

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature for me is that it works on multiple platforms and technologies. I need that because we have... more»

How has it helped my organization?

Since I started, we invested in UFT and automation and we have significantly reduced our release cycle time. That has... more»

What needs improvement?

One thing that confused me, and now just mildly irritates me, is that we migrated from QuickTest Pro to HP UFT, Unified... more»

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The licensing and pricing model is confusing.

Which solutions did we use previously?

UFT was already installed upon my arrival to the organisation. However, having said that, it is the solution I would... more»

What other advice do I have?

I would tell those looking for a solution to go back to good old-fashioned tool selection based on analysis criteria.... more»
Katalon Studio Logo
Katalon Studio
Charvi Russell
Real User
Software QA Engineer at a tech vendor with self employed
May 10 2017

What is most valuable?

* Ability to convert the test steps from manual mode to script mode and vice versa. * The web recording feature is very... more»

How has it helped my organization?

We achieve better productivity with this tool because of easily created, stored, maintained tests. We don't have to... more»

What needs improvement?

* Restricted choice for scripting language (just Groovy).

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It's free (freeware license). So, go ahead!

Which solutions did we use previously?

I previously used TestComplete, but now I use Katalon Studio because it matches my job requirements and it is free.

What other advice do I have?

I think Katalon Studio and the team behind it did a great job. The tool is not only useful but also cost-effective. I... more»
Anonymous User
Real User
Quality Architect at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jul 27 2017

What is most valuable?

Valuable features include generating data including ECP, BVC and risk-based opportunities: * If the data is vast, we... more»

How has it helped my organization?

It has decreased the time for generating test data and risk-based opportunities which has helped us to cover key areas.

What needs improvement?

The Support TDD and BDD could be improved.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing of Tosca and HPE is high.

Which solutions did we use previously?

We switched from Python for fast access of files.

What other advice do I have?

I prefer TDD with SpecFlow and Cucumber using a coded UI. These tools need to be integrated with Tosca to drive the TDD... more»
Laurenz Payer
Real User
Test Master at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees
Apr 19 2017

What do you think of Inflectra SpiraTest?

What is most valuable?: I like the way how we can manage our test cases to test sets. A great benefit is that the information about what/when/who was done is anytime visible from every test case/set/run menu. • How has it helped my organization?: It improved our TC management and helped us with the auditing. • What needs improvement?: Manual test case writing Test management and protocol of the results • For how long have I used the solution?: I have used it for three months. • What was my experience with deployment of the solution?: We have not encountered any deployment issues. • What do I think about the stability of the solution?: We have not encountered any stability issues. • What do I think about the scalability of the solution?: We have not...

Sign Up with Email