SmartBear TestComplete Pros and Cons

SmartBear TestComplete Pros

VolodymyrNabok
Quality Assurance Engineer at a software R&D company with 201-500 employees
Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well.
View full review »
Charles Netshivhera
Integration Specialist at ABSA
The most valuable feature of this solution is regression testing tools.
View full review »
reviewer1202277
Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The most valuable feature is the integration with Azure DevOps.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear, Micro Focus, Ranorex and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Amit Olitzky
QA Team Manager at MTS - Mer Telemanagement Solutions
The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find.
Customer service and technical support responsiveness are high. Everyone is very professional.
View full review »
Deva Veluchamy
Test Automation Lead/Consultant at Aspire Systems
Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution.
View full review »
reviewer1233750
QA Head at a software R&D company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The solution is great as a record and playback tool. It also has valuable regression testing.
View full review »
reviewer1199442
Quality Assurance Engineer at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
The solution helps improve the stability of our product. It also decreases the work of our manual quality assurance engineers.
View full review »

SmartBear TestComplete Cons

VolodymyrNabok
Quality Assurance Engineer at a software R&D company with 201-500 employees
The solution needs to extend the possibilities so that we can test on other operating systems, platforms and publications for Android as well as iOS.
View full review »
Charles Netshivhera
Integration Specialist at ABSA
The artificial intelligence needs to be improved.
View full review »
reviewer1202277
Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
What is currently missing from this solution is better support for mobile testing.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear, Micro Focus, Ranorex and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Amit Olitzky
QA Team Manager at MTS - Mer Telemanagement Solutions
Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work.
Stability issues occurred only when connecting to the SourceSafe. Sometimes, after getting the latest version, the tool hangs and it should be reopened in order to recover.
View full review »
Deva Veluchamy
Test Automation Lead/Consultant at Aspire Systems
Increased performance with less memory and CPU usage.
View full review »
reviewer1233750
QA Head at a software R&D company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The solution needs more training manuals or some form of online forum for learning. It needs more documentation.
View full review »
reviewer1199442
Quality Assurance Engineer at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
The solution needs Mac OS support. Right now, the solution has only been developed to accommodate Windows OS.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear, Micro Focus, Ranorex and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.