So far, with all four clients who have this solution, I have not seen any problem that stands out and causes major headaches or something like that.

In the past three years, I have faced instability. In just one or two instances, I would say when we were running the queries, it was not fetching any result and the error was not proper. That said, that happened in just one or two instances, in the lower environments. Otherwise, the product is very stable.

Snowflake is incredibly stable. I have never had an issue with Snowflake outages.

It’s a stable product. I don't think there is any problem. I think the product is engineered well.

The stability has been phenomenal up until lately. We haven't had any issues until the last month. For the four years prior it was always on; we didn't have any outages. All in all the stability is great. The availability is extremely high. There's just been something in the last month that has caused outages for some periods of hours.

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. I've never had an issue when you connect it to your infrastructure. I'd rate the stability nine out of ten. 

The tool is stable and very powerful.

I would rate the stability of this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

Snowflake is a stable platform. 

The tool is stable. I rate the stability a nine or ten out of ten.

The solution is quite stable since everything is in the cloud, and the data these days has become cheap with storage and everything in the cloud. Through clusters and warehouses, sizes can be increased or decreased based on usage, and they can be turned on and turned off. Sustainability-wise, I think it's a pretty good solution.

This is a stable solution. 

We have high confidence in it.

It is an incredibly stable solution. It will only go down if your cloud provider itself goes down. So, let's say your Snowflake is hosted in Azure London. If the Azure London data center goes down, I would only see Snowflake going down. If that does happen, Snowflake does have plenty of options for failback replication and rollover backups. 

So we have quite a few customers that, for example, need their data restored in AWS London, and they've got a backup or a replication stored in Azure London. If AWS London goes down, then Azure London one will kick in and become the primary account, and all of the URLs, etcetera, remain the same because they've set up failover URLs and connections for it. At least for the end customer, there's no change. It's only for the architecture and developers behind the scene who then have to double-check things and do all the normal due diligence. But it runs very smoothly

My impression from using this product for the last three years is that it is quite stable.

Its stability is fine, but of late, I get loads of messages saying there's some sort of outage or some sort of issue in the application. I keep getting these notifications from Snowflake, which gives a false impression that something wrong is happening, and it might be underlying in the backend. It doesn't seem that stable.

It is stable.

I give the stability an eight out of ten. We rarely have issues.

Excellent.

The stability is reliable and a standard product.

The product is stable.

Recently, I encountered an issue with the solution's data warehouse. The resource monitor had exceeded its quota. I rate its stability as an eight.

It is all cloud. It is really stable. We haven't seen any problems.

Snowflake is a stable solution.

I found that Snowflake is highly stable, which is a reflection of the quality of its network.

The stability of Snowflake is good.

It's stable.

Snowflake is highly stable.

It is stable.

It is pretty stable. Its stability is excellent.

This is a stable solution. 

This is a stable solution. 

My clients haven't faced many stability challenges. It is a relatively new product that's still evolving. They're using it mainly for POCs, so they haven't faced any problems. 

I would give it a ten out of ten. I haven't seen it failover.

The solution is stable.

The stability of Snowflake is very good.

The stability of Snowflake is good.

There's never any outage, and it's cross-cloud. The stability is not even a good question for that platform. It makes no sense to us.

Our customers tell us that it is a stable solution. 

We have had no issues with the stability.

Snowflake is stable.

The solution is very stable and extremely reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is very good.

The stability is very good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. The performance is good.

The product is stable so far.

We didn't run into anything. We had outages for a couple of seconds, but they were related to Amazon or AWS. They weren't related to Snowflake.

We have not had any major issues with stability.

The product is very stable. We never had an issue with stability. It is reliable and it is extremely fast. For example, we had a stock procedure that took half an hour to complete on our SQL cluster, and in Snowflake it was running in two minutes. So that is a significant time savings for just one task.

The solution is stable. We had only one failure, but that was because of AWS issues. Beyond that, I haven't seen anything else. From the Snowflake side, within 10 minutes they reported the AWS issue. It was under two hours of downtime because of the quick response.

I give the stability a nine out of ten.

I've only had one issue related to stability in the past year. 

They claim zero maintenance support and from my experience, I would agree with that statement. When I was on a previous project we had a lot of support for the Netezza platform we were using. We had approximately twelve people, three onsite and seven offshore. When we migrated from Netezza to Snowflake we reduced the number of people required and kept only some of the team as developers. There is very little support required for this solution. Stability is very good in SnowFlake.

The solution is quite stable. It's reliable. It doesn't crash or freeze. There aren't bugs or glitches.

The solution is stable. 

From what I have seen and heard, I think that Snowflake is pretty stable. I haven't faced any such problems, myself. I am not aware of the entirety of the lifecycle, but I haven't heard any complaints.

It is a stable solution.

It is very stable.

It is stable. Its performance is very good.

It is stable.

Stability-wise, this product is good.

It is stable.

The solution is stable.

In terms of stability, so far it is very stable.

The stability is good. There is no performance downtime. 

This is a stable solution and the maintenance and updates are automatic. Snowflake is responsible for that.

No

It is stable.

Snowflake is a stable product.

Our clients have been very impressed with the solution's overall stability.

The solution has been very stable for us.

The product is stable and the performance is excellent. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's extremely reliable. 

It is extremely stable.

It is stable.

Its stability is absolutely great. There are no problems with its stability.

The solution is stable. We bring in incremental loads into Snowflake. There are pipelines that daily seed data from Oracle to a data warehouse. It's a prebuilt code and it allows for great stability.

The stability of the solution is very good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's very reliable in terms of performance.

The scenarios that we are using are not complex. For what we are using it's pretty stable.