SoapUI Pro Room for Improvement

reviewer1434804
Middleware Technical Analyst at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
I think their user-information sites should be better defined by SoapUI. For example, if I want to hit that virtualize server, let's say, with a 100K load — what is the bare minimum requirement? That kind of definition is not available anywhere. If that level of measurement could be given, that would be really helpful. Tool-wise, I find no technical limitations as such. It's all as expected. It all depends on how much memory and how much you want to allocate. That's pretty typical for this type of solution. I suppose the GUI could be slightly improved. Right now, we don't have a way to capture the JVM stacks either for the virtualization or for the service when using SoapUI Pro for load testing. View full review »
Andrew Kemboi
Digital Bank-QA and DevOps Lead at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The automation needs improvement. We tried automation but it's not easy to integrate with the synching and some of the mission tools that we use for automated testing of APIs. That is the main section that we use and it needs to improve a lot. They could include extra trial sessions with the extended license for critical types because they have trial versions that are provided for one month. For corporate companies, it is not enough time to explore and access it and give feedback on whether they are proceeding with it or not. They should include a trial session for at least three months. That would be very good. In the next release, I would like integration with other tools to support software development, for example, Go! Zilla for defect management, so that I am able to test it, connect it, and trace it back to my requirement and log my defects seamlessly. I would like seamless connectivity with other software development tools. View full review »
reviewer1368882
Senior Test Manager at a logistics company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better. The load testing performance needs to be adjusted. It could work much more effectively, in my opinion. They should work on the pricing of the solution. Right now, we find it to be overly expensive. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear, Parasoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: January 2021.
455,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Aishwarya
Associate Professional Product Developer at Computer Sciences Corporation
The tools that are stated by SmartBear speaks for itself, but when it comes to improvements, there could be a release which only aims for the development of beginners in terms of understanding the tools that are laid by SmartBear. View full review »
TatyanaPytel
Project Manager at Atlant Inc.
The documentation needs to be improved because the interface is not easy for a first-time user. It would be better if the price of this solution was lowered. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear, Parasoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: January 2021.
455,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.