SonicWall Capture Client could be made a little lighter than it currently is in terms of memory consumption.

The biggest issue with SonicWall Capture Client is network latency. We have a 150-millisecond delay from the SonicWall Capture Client center. SonicWall should put some servers in South America so that we can be closer to the network on the internet.

The solution's pricing should be improved, and the solution should be made more feasible.

The vulnerability reports need to be better. Windows Defender detected some issues that SonicWall Capture Client couldn't. 

An area for improvement in SonicWall Capture Client is TenantCloud support. Suppose you want to implement SonicWall Capture Client. You'll have to register it on MySonicWall. Then once your SonicWall Capture Client license expires and you don't want to renew it, you can't delete it from your MySonicWall account, so that's an area for improvement.

I'm an expert on endpoint security products such as Kaspersky, Malwarebytes, etc. SonicWall Capture Client is the best endpoint security product I've ever used, so I have no suggestion for additional features for SonicWall Capture Client.

The solution's management console looks a little bit old. They should improve their user interface.

We realized that after deploying it, after installing the SonicWall Capture Client, there was a performance impact on the system. It used to consume a lot of storage and memory, and other resources. That isn't great. It's an aspect we hope gets fixed. It must consume less storage, less CPU, and other resources.

In general, the performance issue was the major problem. A user was not able to access his documents, the basic files and all, and that caused a major issue for him.

It takes technical support too long to resolve an issue.