Sophos UTM Other Solutions Considered
MG
M.K. Goyal
Asst General Manager(C&IT) at NMDC Ltd
FortiGate 1000D.
View full review »Per market analysis, the solution is in the top three with FortiGate and Palo Alto.
All three solutions are comparable so the best fit depends on your engines, environment, and requirements.
View full review »NA
Nagaraj AG
Head of Operations at Intersect Technologies
I compared Sophos UTM with Fortinet and found that Fortinet's EPP, ATP, and hardware are good. Sophos UTM has also improved its hardware by updating its dual-core processors with a second processor that uses advanced technology, whereas previously, the hardware was handled by a single processor. However, we are still facing some problems with Multicast User Authentication.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Sophos UTM
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Sophos UTM. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
MM
Marek Modlinski Modlinski
Senior Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
We sell the Meraki MX solution to protect some of our customers, and we are resellers of FortiGate as well.
Sophos is easier to set up than Meraki.
When it comes to reading the logs of other devices, it is much easier with Meraki, FortiGate, or even the Sophos XG firewall.
At the moment, all of the firewalls on the market are doing the same thing. Once you buy the license, it will cover everything.
View full review »AP
Anthony Petecca
Manager IT and Security at Health Street
We looked at Webroot, primarily. That was pretty much the only one we evaluated that was even close to being a competitor. We did look at a few others, but we didn't even do the trials because \Webroot and Sophos offered so much more.
Webroot seemed really nice for Windows, but we have a lot of Macs. Our servers are Windows, and we definitely went with Sophos for the servers because it has a little bit more capability with Webroot.
An example would be that if you have a file server, it will actually detect if a source is changing stuff on the file server. Suppose that a client was connected to them. That client wouldn't even need protection. Sophos is smart enough to understand, "Hey, a client just uploaded this virus." Webroot wouldn't do that. Sophos also lets us do full isolations of the servers or workstations. So if something gets infected, we can isolate that machine with the click of a button, clean it up, and then release it back into the network. That's not something Webroot was capable of handling either. Those were two big things to us because both of those features stop viruses from spreading.
Everyone's going to get infected at some point. We just want to stop the spread as soon as possible.
View full review »I'm currently performing a benchmarking of the other solutions against Sophos.
View full review »ZE
ZaherEL Bsat
Pre-sales manager at National Information Technology Company
We tried and tested Fortigate from Fortinet. We tested several appliances about six years back. Not Palo Alto at that time, only Fortinet.
We evaluated other open-source Linux software but not appliances. We decided to go with Sophos UTM based on several factors related to the tests we did at that time.
Evaluation is very important so that you can see what are you buying and what you are going to face in the future.
View full review »FS
Frank Scalzo
Director of Cloud Technology at Avalere Health\Inovalon
I went and looked at Check Point eight years ago, because back then, I loved Check Point. They also weren't many solutions like this back then. AWS Marketplace did not even exist eight years ago!
After comparing Check Point and Sophos pricing, I questioned whether the decimal for Sophos was in the wrong spot. Sophos's competitors were so much higher in price.
Originally, cost sold me because Check Point and Sophos had the same features. Now, Sophos has surpassed Check Point's features.
View full review »GM
Gonzalo Moreno
Owner at supernovatel
I have evaluated other solutions, such as Cisco.
View full review »Various other platforms were evaluated before choosing the Sophos SG including CheckPoint – UTM1, FortiGate, and Sophos XG (Beta – at the time). All have their own areas where they shine and should be short listed candidate for anyone looking to implement a UTM.
View full review »As a networking engineer, all new products in this category interest me. I find myself testing a lot of different products personally. Here at Flexible Systems, I did not try any other products prior to switching to Sophos. Since we are an MSP, we have had plenty of exposure to many brands of firewalls (Cisco ASA, SonicWall, WatchGuard, Fortinet, ADTRAN, and Edgewater). I personally would choose the Sophos UTM over any other product, including the Sophos XG platform.
View full review »GG
reviewer1640424
Technical Director at a security firm with 1-10 employees
I have evaluated other solutions, such as Sophos XGS.
View full review »MA
Maroun Abboud
Data Department Manager at BTC Networks
Prior to Sophos, it was mainly Juniper and Fortinet.
View full review »SR
Scott Rouse
Architecture and DevOps at hc1.com
We looked at a couple other products. However, overall, Sophos UTM seemed to fit the bill. It has allowed us to have a solution that we can maintain and not have to babysit all the time.
View full review »We looked at a few, but I can't remember right now.
View full review »IH
Ibrahim El Sayed
Network & Hardware Administrator at Nile Projects & Trading Co.
We did not evaluate other solutions prior to choosing this one.
View full review »PN
Paulo Nunes
Director with 11-50 employees
I'm also aware of Fortinet options, however, they are more expensive if you look at Fortinet vs Sophos.
View full review »While we were looking for deployment of UTM product on AWS in year 2011, there were only 2 stable products available in market i.e., Sophos and Checkpoint. We choose to go ahead with Sophos.
View full review »JX
John Xavier
CIO at Quartesian, LLC
We originally considered Barracuda and another solution.
We chose Sophos because we thought that it provided superior service. Also, they have a long history in the market, and I received a recommendation from one of my consultants.
View full review »IS
CTO0a65
CTO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
We evaluated SonicWall, WatchGuard, and Stormshield (Netasq) solutions.
View full review »We evaluated SonicWall, Palo Alto, and Untangle.
View full review »BB
SrEngineer672
Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
No, we had a good relationship with Sophos and after comparing it to our previous solution (SonicWall) we were convinced it was a good product.
View full review »I evaluated Fortinet, but Sophos UTM is easier to manage and more efficiently priced.
View full review »RT
reviewer1019058
Software Sales Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We also implemented Kaspersky and McAfee.
View full review »MP
Max Pupov
DevOps at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
I am also using OpenVPN.
Partially, for historic reasons, things were built prior to me being able to evaluate stuff. At the moment, we are using both solutions. In terms of pricing, when I need to spin up anything small with smaller requirements, I am using the free OpenVPN instead of Sophos UTM.
View full review »We looked at several open-source firewall options whose names I will not mention, and the reason we did not use them was because of the ease of use, and what our support desk could do.
View full review »Linux ipchains and modern equivalents.
View full review »The instability and best effort service of a community of the open source solution did not give the right trust to depend on in the battle against the negative sides of the worldwide internet
View full review »VM
Vishal Maithani
Assistant Manager IT Zircon Technology at Zircon Techonolgy
We considered implementing a SonicWall product, but went with Sophos UTM because it is easier to handle and configure.
View full review »AP
GlobalNe150a
Global Network Security Admin at a consumer goods company with 201-500 employees
We also considered Symantec and McAfee. We did not chose them because we had experience with both of them and were not happy with their platforms.
We chose Sophos for its ease of use and it detects malware and viruses that other companies can't detect.
View full review »JM
Javier Medina
Cyber Security Officer at Grupo Vision
yes i did, Fortinet, Checkpoint, Palo Alto, Meraki.
View full review »We looked at Fortinet.
View full review »EB
Elías Björnsson
Senior IT Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
I evaluated pfSense, and still go with pfSense where IPSec to AzurePack services are needed because Sophos does not support IKEv2.
View full review »JC
Securityde9c
Security Architect at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
We looked at Symantec, but liked Sophos's licensing better.
View full review »NP
Neeraj Panwar
Cloud Network Administrator at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
We did not have experience with a firewall prior to installing this solution.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Sophos UTM
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Sophos UTM. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.