Sophos XG Previous Solutions

SherifFouad
IT Manager-Africa/Technical Services Manager at a mining and metals company with 201-500 employees
I've used heaps of them through the years. I've used Fortigate, which is now Fortinet. I've used Websense, they issued something like that years ago. ISS issued something like that years ago. Sophos UTM, along with Cyberoam UTM, since they are both the same - it's only a different interface and a different hardware look - they provide the best value for the money. You get the best features for the best cost. They are the best, to a certain limit for a certain usage. I never use any of those units as a firewall. What I usually do is, I have an edge firewall responsible for routing, switching, and firewalling. And then I deploy the UTM behind it, only for filtering. The most important criteria when selecting a vendor include getting the best features that you can get for an equivalent cost, so you're paying for what you're getting. You don't want to be paying for the name or the brand or the reputation of it. Also important are pre-sales services and "1000-percent" technical support services, in the environment and the remote areas we operate in, the warranty services as well. View full review »
Sherif Fouad
Project Manager at a mining and metals company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I used Cyberoam previously, although I always used it as a UTM only. What made me move to Sophos is that they were acquired, i.e. they acquired Cyberoam to start with the development. At that time the software had many features that were not available with FortiGate, in terms of content filtering, and it was an appliance when Websense was the software to be installed on a server. There was a problem with our operating system with some of the updates, i.e. with the operating system or the hardware. I moved from Websense to Cyberoam because it wasn't applying properly. View full review »
Kolanji Selvaraj
IT Consultant at Crotus
We have been using the Sophos XG 135 model at our remote sites and it works. This year we deployed the XG 210 model at our data center, but prior to this we used Barracuda. We switched because Barracuda is too expensive. The options are very limited because you have to pay for each additional option. Each one represents a different service, like ADP (Active DDoS Prevention) or firewall. In contrast, Sophos is only a single payment, so we switched even though we lost some options that we liked. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Sophos, Fortinet, pfSense and others in Firewalls. Updated: September 2019.
370,827 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Tunji Gbola
Chairman at BASL
The solution we were using previously was Cyberoam. The Cyberoam device was about five years old and had started malfunctioning. It wasn't giving us the output it had previously provided. At that time, Sophos had already bought Cyberoam. We had the option to either upgrade the OS to a Sophos OS or to a Sophos device. We decided to go for a Sophos device since the Cyberoam device was already problematic. View full review »
Hesham Sakr
IT Infrastructure & Security Manager at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Before Sophos there was mix of various legacy solutions that were not really considered firewall grade. The only specific thing that was used was a software-based firewall, but it was used on a very limited scale and only temporarily. View full review »
SecMgr5390
Senior IT Infrastructure Solutions Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We were previously using a different solution, a Cisco ASA firewall, but it was not a next-generation of firewall, next-generation meaning it can do unified threat management. We wanted a new solution that would also give us next-generation features, like anti-malware and end-point management and the like. That informed our choice of Sophos. When selecting a vendor, the stability of the solution and then the technical support are very important. Also, the cost-to-reward ratio, the value we get from the product compared to what we pay for it. In addition, ease of management; how easy is it to manage? If it's too complex to manage it's a problem because you don't want to spend too much time managing it. View full review »
Leadvanceng574
Lead Advance Engineer at IHCC
We only use Sophos because it can integrate with other product like FortiGate and we can easily connect the two programs. This makes the program scalable and easy to use. Many other products on the market are not compatible with each other and that is why we chose Sophos. View full review »
Supportservice464
Support Services Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 51-200 employees
We did not previously use a different solution. View full review »
Vikas-Gupta
Mr with 51-200 employees
Our previous solution was Check Point. I switched to Sophos just because of the pricing issue. View full review »
Ibrahim El Sayed
Network & Hardware Administrator with 1,001-5,000 employees
This is the first solution that we implemented. View full review »
Ivanildo Teixeira Galv√£o
Consultant Information Technology at a tech company with 51-200 employees
I still use Fortigate, also Sophos UTM. As I'm a solution consultant, I have different clients where each solution fits the environment. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Sophos, Fortinet, pfSense and others in Firewalls. Updated: September 2019.
370,827 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email