I would rate the scalability of this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

The scalability of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is excellent.

Scalability is excellent. That's what Splunk is designed for, big data aggregation. It's been very easy and seamless to scale up over the years.

We have not had any issues there.

Splunk is scalable. It's easy to add more devices as needed. 

The solution is really scalable. You can easily add more components and different vendors. 

We're an IT service provider. We don't use Splunk ourselves. However, a bank we work for has about 500 employees right now that would be leveraging Splunk. 

We have not looked at Splunk as a means of being able to scale, but we have not been hindered by using Splunk. Our goal has not been growth, but maintaining stable and secure networking, and this is what we have achieved. But with or without Splunk, we would have achieved that anyway.

It is pretty scalable. I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.

We have about 100 people on the solution. Some of them don't use the solution directly, however, they benefit from the solution.

It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten. Around fifty to a hundred people are working on the solution. Also, the solution is extensively used in my organization. Currently, our company has no plans to increase the number of users using the solution.

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is scalable.

The scalabililty is ok. If you want to scale then it's fine.

We do not have a lot of users who are using Splunk in our company. At most, it is a little over five people. For now, that is all we need and we do not plan to increase the usage in the near future. We are happy with what we have, how it is deployed and how it serves the need we have deployed it to fill.  

The solution is very scalable. However, companies must be aware that expanding the solution is very expensive.

I don't consider the solution scalable.

There is no issue with scalability at all.

We have a hundred users. I really do not know how scalable the solution is. I couldn't find any submission for a flat fee and for expanding the installation in my last project. So perhaps this is also something that can be improved.

It is scalable.