Splunk is stable. We haven't had any downtime or performance issues. 

It is sometimes slow. It also depends on the number of use cases or queries. You need to optimize the use cases or queries that are running and consuming a lot of resources. I have also seen Splunk Cloud hanging a bit. I would rate it a seven out of ten in terms of stability.

Splunk Enterprise Security is stable.

It's rock solid. It never failed. Having resilience in our organization is fundamental to our security position. 

It is very stable. We never had any issues or bugs.

Splunk is highly stable if you meet all the prerequisites and have enough physical memory for your local storage. 

Splunk Enterprise Security is stable 70 or 80% of the time. However, the query gets slow whenever a large number of people are working on Splunk.

Its stability is amazing. It is always up. It is fantastic.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security's stability a seven out of ten. This is because the system lacks built-in protection against certain issues. It alerts us when there are problems in the system, which we then need to address. However, these issues are not always easily fixable, setting it apart from other systems. For instance, sometimes the system slows down while we're working. This can occur when a new alert is implemented, leading to high resource usage and system instability. We are then required to identify and rectify the specific cause of this problem. This might involve disabling or adjusting the alert to ensure it doesn't negatively impact the system's performance.

It provides good stability capabilities.

Splunk is a stable product.

Splunk Enterprise Security is stable.

The solution is not going anywhere. As long as they continue to support and develop it, and not make it a cloud solution, we will continue to purchase it.

It is stable overall. 

At least in our environment, it is super stable. When you think about how much time you spend working with other applications, just Windows Server requires more feeding than Splunk does, you see that Splunk is a very low maintenance care and feeding product.

We have probably 150 users in the environment and their roles vary from being application management folks to application engineering folks to the executive suite, so lots of different use cases. The executive suite tend to prefer more curated content and the application owners have a mix of curated content and dynamic search functions they can perform. Then the engineering tier basically gets some curated content and some free reign to do whatever they want for the most part. I'm the guy that supports this instance. So there's one person.

I support not only Splunk, but I am also the campus security engineer and I'm also the dude that runs or is responsible for all of our campus monitoring infrastructure. So that tells you how little maintenance is required.

We are adding new use cases on a fairly regular basis and we are adding more licensing to our indexing license. I don't see Splunk going away. There's nothing else that I think provides the ability to do this much data analytics from just the numbers of equipment that you need to run it. Also, the number of people that you need to actually make sure that it's functioning well. In higher ed., everybody always says we should do open source. And I respond that what I do in Splunk with 20 systems, I would need three racks of equipment to do on an open source platform. I have basically 70 - 75% of the racks now and I'd need three times that or more to run this as an open source product. And it wouldn't be as cute and it wouldn't be as beautiful or as flexible.

The solution is stable, however, sometimes in some of the collectors, we are facing a lot of issues. That said, overall, if you rate it from one to five, I would say in terms of stability, it will stand at a three. 

It's a very stable solution. 

The stability is okay.

Splunk would tell you, especially on the different licenses they have, your storage, and your level of ingesting, it can vary. 

Splunk needs to be more clear between storage and performance. 

We worked with a client where almost immediately their storage was already in red. They didn't understand their storage needs as that wasn't clear. 

I haven't seen any issues with stability. Most of the stability issues I've seen have actually been on the on-prem hardware.

It is very good as long as you have the scope of how many servers, processors, and other things you need. There was a learning curve of making sure our servers were beefy enough to handle the data. We had four terabytes of data coming in every day. We were maxing out our systems a little bit, so we beefed that up, and we have had no issues since. 

We are maintaining a multi-cloud environment across multiple regions, and for the last two years, Splunk Enterprise Security has maintained a 99.999 percent uptime.

The tool is stable. I rate the stability a seven or eight out of ten.

I rate Enterprise Security nine out of 10 for stability. Splunk is solidly stable. We've rarely experienced a crash requiring us to rebuild cases. 

I started working with Splunk Enterprise Security at version 6 and now we are up to 9 and it needs more resources. But it's okay because we have a lot of functionality now. It's better than it was earlier. I would rate the stability at nine out of 10.

I would rate the stability of Splunk Enterprise Security ten out of ten.

The resilience is good. I have not faced any issues.

Splunk Enterprise Security is stable.

Splunk Enterprise Security is stable.

The stability and availability of Splunk are great. It does get weird when we initially update items, however. That's the only time we see issues. It may try to input data in areas it doesn't need to. That said, we are aware of the quirks of the setup. 

The solution is very reliable. I like its stability. It always works.

Splunk Enterprise Security has gone through multiple versions, so the product is mature and stable. It's currently on version 9. 

I rate Splunk 10 out of 10 for stability. 

I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

The stability of the functionality is good, but there are still bugs that keep hindering things. I am waiting but they are there and that is quite common. I think they have not yet been resolved from the older versions. The stability is a seven-plus out of 10.

Splunk Enterprise is stable. 

Splunk Enterprise Security is stable.

The stability of the solution is quite good.

Splunk Enterprise Security is an extremely stable product.

Splunk is compatible with a wide range of other products and is not constrained by specific configurations. Whether it's a single-sided or multi-sided cluster, whether it's used by a single team or multiple teams across different program locations, Splunk is flexible and adaptable. Data recovery is also a key feature, ensuring that data is never lost. This is one of Splunk's most significant advantages. Multiple indexes are maintained to safeguard data integrity, so even if one index fails, the data remains accessible to all users at all times.

There are different modules, and I haven't activated all yet, however, the stability is okay. I would rate it seven out of ten. If we run into issues, there are materials they provide and online support. You can even call them. 

It is very stable. I did not have any crashes or malfunctions. It does have a bit of a stretching point when you are doing a very large query or you are retrieving a lot of data. For example, when you are retrieving months of logs in order to conduct an investigation. However, that is at the edge of the product. On a day-to-day basis, it is very stable. It does everything that you need to do. We did not have any crashes in either of our implementations. We did not have anything major.

I rate the stability of Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten.

I cannot say anything about stability, but I am assuming it would be the same as Splunk. It is an app. It is going to work.

Splunk Enterprise Security is a very stable product, but there are occasional bugs that can appear.

It is a stable product.

I have never seen any issues with the tool’s stability.

It is probably one of the most resilient tools in our environment, so I really enjoy what it provides us. It definitely provides us that 24/7 accessibility to our environment.

I would rate the stability a 9 out of 10. With a stable environment, we may encounter issues 2 percent of the time.

I rate Splunk Enterprise Security nine out of 10 for stability.

I find it to be highly stable, and I would rate it a solid ten out of ten.

I would rate the stability of Splunk Enterprise Security ten out of ten. We have never had an issue with stability.

The solution is stable. If you have suitable resources and buy and use the correct license, you'll get fine performance. 

It has been working for us so far.

I would rate it eight out of ten in terms of stability. Where there has been ambiguity for me is that I recently had system stability issues that were beyond my control. They were part of my solution, and I was not aware that Splunk was accountable for it. It got quickly resolved, but there was a gap there that created pain for my business.

It is pretty stable. We have not had any instances where Splunk just completely died. Its stability is good.

Stability-wise, despite these issues, it's been solid. I haven't had any issues with access to it or anything like that. The only issue we did have was with the engineer. After informing him of those issues, he went back and tweaked them, and then everything worked fine. 

Stability is excellent. It is the most stable SIEM solution I've worked with.

Stability had its drawbacks because of how much it consumes. We had to justify whether or not it was worth keeping it up. The decision was to not keep up with it.

I use Splunk at least a couple of times a week.

It is excellent in terms of performance and reliability.

I'd rate the ability eight out of ten. 

It's quite stable. It's a mature product. 

The product runs on Linux so it's very stable. It's important to have a well-run SAN environment to store the data. 

In terms of stability, I really liked it. I didn't see any issues as far as stability was concerned. Whenever I needed it, it was there. It was available, and it worked. It was pretty good.

It is a stable product.

The tool is very stable. Once we set it up properly, it's reliable.

Splunk is a stable solution.

Splunk is stable, and this is why many customers want it.

I would rate Splunk as one of the big five platforms. I would give it a high rating based on the efficiency of the platform. 

Splunk is a very stable solution.

Stability is very good. 

It is very stable. We have not had any problems. 

We had to upgrade when it was on-premise, but then we went to cloud version, which is very good.

The solution is stable and reliable. 

It is very stable.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security's stability 9 out of 10. 

I've never had any issues with Splunk's stability.

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

I did not have any issues with the stability of Splunk. It was quite stable.

This solution is excellent from a performance and stability perspective. There's very minimal maintenance required. Basically the only aspect we need to maintain is the one we have on-prem. So patching up everything and making sure it has the required updates. 

Stability has been great. I don't think we have ever had an outage from it.

We don't do a lot of searching. If there is somewhere with problems, it will probably have to be with a lot of searches, and we don't have that. We don't have many developers searching every day. It is mostly when there is a problem, then we use it for diagnostics. So, we don't put a large search load on it. However, the reliability of it has been great. It hasn't been down for us at any point.

It's a stable solution. We are not going to get rid of it anytime soon. It’s reliable. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn’t crash or freeze. The performance is good.

This product is very stable.

The stability has been good. It offers good performance and doesn't seem to be buggy. There aren't glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

We did not encounter any issues with stability.

Not at all.

Splunk is probably the best brand in terms of stability. I'd rate its reliability at a four out of five. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

There have been no issues in particular. What we are using has not been that heavy.

We have not experienced any issues.

No stability concerns.

There were no stability issues. It is one of the most stable systems that I have worked with.

Released versions are quite stable. We encountered some visual bugs following major upgrades but that was due to custom CSS that we had edited into Splunk.

Out-of-the-box functions are nearly flawless, but when you push at the edges, then things start to get a little flexible in their eloquence. There is a robust community of support to help through most issues and the documentation is exceptional.

It is a stable product.

It is stable.

It is pretty stable, though it has gone down from our usage. We do need to keep an eye on our query volumes. Right now, it is too easy for a user to write a query, run it, make it available in polling mode (real-time mode), and bring down the server. Some more safety alerting would help and be beneficial.

We do have to educate developers on how to not blow it up. It is a little to easy to write an expensive query and overly stress the system. This could be improved. Overall, once you have people who know what they are doing, it is very stable.

No stability issues.

The stability of the product is very good. The performance is reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. it doesn't crash or freeze. We've had no issues. 

It has been very stable. It is pretty rock solid.

In terms of stability, it's reliable. There aren't bugs or glitches. it works well. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

Stability-wise, it's great.

On the cloud, we are pushing through less than half a petabyte of data. So far, it has been fairly stable because it runs on all the underlying AWS infrastructures. Therefore, we have had no issues at all. In terms of availability or outages that we've experienced, there haven't been any. We've been fairly happy with the overall landscape of how it works on AWS.

No stability issues.

There are no software stability issues. The issues so far have been internal.

The performance is very good. It's something that customers are always looking for. The product offers good stability. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

Splunk is a highly stable solution.

We haven't had any problems with stability. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

In terms of operations, it is stable, but if you don't have a proper configuration and sizing, there could be many issues. It could be more efficient on the storage part. We are still in the deployment stage to be able to say that for sure.

It's been very stable for us. Most of our stress in not from Splunk, but from disk I/O, like input and output for the disk that you are writing logs to. We have had more issue with our own hardware than Splunk. 

You have to make sure if you're writing an enormous amount of data that you have your I/O sorted out beforehand. 

It's not high maintenance. There are software or upgrade releases every now and then, however, in general, the product is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution is stable. 

In general, Splunk is stable.

In terms of stability, the product seems to work just fine. We haven't had any problems with it.

It is stable under production environments.

Not at all.

There were no issues with stability.

I would rate the stability of Splunk Enterprise Security a four out of ten. Some bugs cause downtime.

Splunk is a stable solution. I am very happy with the stability of Splunk.

We have been satisfied with the stability of the solution.

Unfortunately, lately every release has a new memory leak.  Be SURE to upgrade late and READ THE RELEASE NOTES, especially the "Known Issues" section.

The solution is stable.

The users access the native cloud solution. So we are taking advantage of the native cloud solution provided, and by using the gentle scaling approach this has helped stability.

I haven't had any stability issues with it. It's pretty stable. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or feeze.

It's very stable.

We put a lot of trust in it. It has been pretty rock-solid outside of a couple of changes that we made. Upgrades sometimes don't always go smoothly, but otherwise the system performs, and operates. 

Stability is perfect. It's a good product. The market right now is moving towards cloud. We will use cloud in our option strategy. One thing that Splunk does not have is a partner consulting base so Splunk depends heavily on its own consulting, which I think should not be there. They should promote more partners for consulting. In fact, their education program is also very costly for all partners. For example, if you want to get your guys certified it's really costly. Because they have a good solution, they're completely inflexible with pricing. I don't see a lot of enablement from Splunk. 

This is a stable solution. Deployment takes one person, it can be a system admin or an engineer.

Yes, there have been issues with the Enterprise Security application instance.  

It is very stable.

It is very stable haven't encounter any glitches or bugs till now.

It's stable and very safe. 

No stability issues.

It's running great given the information it processes.

Stability-wise, it's perfect. We haven't had any problem with Splunk. It's good software.

The solution is stable, I have not experienced any bugs or glitches.

Once you set up the solution, you don't really have to worry about it. It's very stable. I like the fact that you can pretty much just patch the OS, and it doesn't really affect how Splunk runs. With a lot of products, you almost have to wait for that company to implement a new patch or version of the product before you can upgrade the server it's on, or anything like that. Or you can't upgrade, you just have to go with whatever they give you, because they're giving you an appliance or something. I like the fact that Splunk allows you to integrate and still run as Splunk and still be compliant with most vulnerabilities out there without affecting functionality.

I have not had any issues with it, and we have the whole banking infrastructure running on it.

We don't have any issues with it now. We had some issues in the past, but we chalked those up to user error. We didn't know what we were doing at first.

As of now, we have had no issues with stability. It is running like a charm.

Splunk is a stable solution.

This solution is stable. 

The performance is good. It's stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

It is stable. We don't seem to have any problems related to bugs. We are very happy with it.

It is a stable solution. 

Splunk is a highly stable solution.

It is always up when I need to search. I am probably not using it that much. I will maybe search a couple times a day for something specific, so I am not using it too much. I know plenty of the people who are doing a lot more for debugging, and who use it a lot all day.

The stability is good. We stress it at 98 percent.

We had no stability issues.

We raised support cases.

I can't really speak to the solution's stability beyond how I use it, which is for training. However, I've never experienced bugs or glitches on it and therefore believe it to be very reliable.

We didn’t have any stability issues.

It is stable.

The solution has been stable.

The stability is fine.

We have two people maintaining it.

It is a stable product.

It is quite stable.

Splunk is stable.

It is absolutely stable.

It is stable. It is very powerful.

The solution is stable. 

No stability issues.

There were no stability issues.

There were stability issues, but only with the visualization layer.

There were no stability issues. It was running on a VM over Hyper-V.

Performance upgrades are needed when more processing power is required.

Sometimes we have had instances when it will not run for a couple of days. There is room for improvement here.

The stability of Splunk is good enough.