SQL Server is a highly stable solution.

In version 2019, they introduced a really good and stable environment. Bugs are there, but bug fixes are provided by Microsoft. We have premium support with Microsoft. If we find a bug, they work on it and provide a solution.

SQL Server is solid as a rock now. It never used to be. It was quite flakey in the past.

In fact, databases as a whole have matured very well. I used to work for IBM in the 1990s and I sold DB2. We had our share of problems, that's for sure.

I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten. 

SQL Server is a stable solution.

It is an extremely stable solution.

The solution offers very good performance and is pretty reliable. 

The stability is excellent. There are no bugs or glitches. it doesn't crash or freeze.

For big organizations, like ours, SQL Server is very good in terms of reliability and security. It has the Always-On feature and many more features. I appreciate its reliability.

I have found the solution to be very stable.

If the dataset is limited, the performance is good. If it involves bulk data, then the speed is slow.

The tool is stable. I rate the stability a seven out of ten.

I can't provide a definitive comment on stability, but I'd lean towards the positive side and rate it around a seven out of ten. I've encountered more efficient and faster databases that deserve a higher rating. Therefore, I'm hesitant to rate SQL Server a nine out of ten for stability.

It is a stable solution.

It is a robust and stable solution. Its tracking record is reliable and it can handle large volumes of data.

I have had issues with SQL Server but Microsoft support has been able to resolve them quickly and most came down to configuration/design errors and not a stability of the product issue.

We have not experienced any problems with the stability of this solution.

It is one of the most stable relational databases out there.

The product is stable.

I rate the solution’s stability a 9 out of 10.

It is a very stable solution. Hundreds and thousands of customers have adopted SQL Server since it is a very stable solution.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Performance issues are a common concern when using SQL Server. However, it's important to recognize that the problem may not solely lie with SQL Server. It is stable. My team has four members using it. 

It is a highly stable solution. It was our database of choice because of its reliability. It just does what it says on the tin. We've never experienced any issues with it. I've never experienced any issues with it crashing or anything like that. 

It works fine. There are no issues.

The product is stable. The community is big.

I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten.

I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.

There's a reporting database feature in SQL Server, but running multiple instances on the same box would be beneficial. That's one limitation we've encountered. Many of our customers utilize a hosting provider that offers multi-tenant SQL Servers, but we cannot implement a multi-tenant reporting database. 

SQL Server is a very stable product.

What I don't know yet is if it would be stable when being migrated from the scale of a project that would be in a prototype on a small machine, into a much larger environment in order to get ready to go to production. I'm not sure of that experience, whether it's vulnerable or not. I haven't tried it.

However, in my experience, so far, the solution is quite stable. In terms of stability, with Microsoft being so supportive of its success, and so many smart professionals who have the skillsets to use it, that it would be stable. I'm confident about that. It's not a new tool, so stable being defined as it doesn't break down.

I would rate the stability of the solution as a nine out of ten.

We have not had any issues with the stability of SQL Server.

This solution has fantastic stability. 

The product is very stable, from my experience. It doesn't crash or freeze. There are no bugs or glitches. I've used it for ten years with very few issues. The performance and reliability are very good.

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten.

The stability is good. 

We do clustering. If one SQL Server goes down, it automatically goes to another one.

Its stability has been good. The solution performs well and is reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

MS SQL is very stable. However, the corruption of databases needs to be handled more accurately. If I'm using MS SQL Server and my server accidentally restarts or one of my machines restarts accidentally, then usually the MDB or the MDF file is corrupted. That corruption of files should be handled more efficiently because the client loses most of the data. Of course, the backup plan should be more efficient, putting less load on the server. That needs to be improved and more optimized.

SQL Server is a stable product.

The stability is fine, especially if you're hosting it on AWS or Azure. You can get up to 99.99% stability on AWS.

I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.

We did not have any issues with stability. The tool is stable.

SQL Server is a stable solution.

SQL Server is stable. SQL Server has crashed only two times in six years, but it wasn't a major system error. 

The solution is sufficiently stable. 

It's exceptionally stable. The ease of implementation and the ease of use can't be beaten. I think it's outstanding overall.

It is very stable.

The product could be more stable than Oracle.

With the versions we have, the solution is quite stable. That's one of the reasons we don't immediately download the latest version. We wait a little bit before we go to the newest version. We want to make sure it's very stable beforehand.

SQL Server is stable and is a high-performance database. We do hundreds of transactions per second, it's fairly robust, it does not struggle. Mostly, if your hardware is strong enough and you've set it up properly, then you can actually perform a lot of transactions per second on a SQL Serving installation.

The stability is very good.

The stability is great. There are no bugs or glitches. it doesn't crash or freeze. It's very reliable. The performance is great. 

I find the solution to be very stable. 

It is a stable product.

When it's medium or small-scale data volume, people are referring to MySQL, however, when the data volume grows the people are referring to Oracle. In my estimation, the stability is fine.

It is very stable. I would rate it an eight out of ten in terms of stability.

I have seen that this is a very stable product.

I use SQL Server on a daily basis.

Issues encountered with stability were always correctable assuming we as a business were willing to spend money. The two major issues that come to mind were slowing of image files loading to disk using SQL Server and lack of proper indexing.

Images were archived for a 30 year legal period at a rate of at least 12 million per year and we eventually just hit a max depth of data where SQL Server had a hard time returning results. Shortening the physical file path structure of how deep SQL Server had to dig through the hard drive in addition to changing to new and improved disk technologies resolved the problem.

After this drive change occurred, a separate problem started where our database came to a crawl which is when we realized our regularly scheduled database index had not been updated to accommodate the new structure changes. A new index was put in place which is when SQL Server started humming along better than ever.

Sometimes we experience issues with its stability.

There are problems in all systems, and I don't see any difference between open source and proprietary solutions. SQL Server, Postgres, and Oracle are all vulnerable. There are no known issues per se, but any system can be broken. There is nothing special about this database.

It is pretty much bulletproof. We never had data corruption and database failure. We've had hardware failures, but that's not the fault of the software.

It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven or eight out of ten.

The stability of the product is great. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. it's reliable. 

SQL Server is stable. However, every product has limitations. It is stable for a certain amount of workload. Beyond the capabilities of this solution, you will need other data solutions, such as Oracle. A solution that is more secure.

The stability is great. It's very reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

It's stable. The database service is better than the analysis service, but it's quite stable. It's as stable as the support it has. If it has a good infrastructure and good machines with disks, it's quite stable.

This product is not quite as stable as Oracle. I would rate the stability as moderate and would not rate it ten out of ten.

I rate the product’s stability a seven out of ten.

The stability of SQL Server is very important for us because we provide services for banks. The banks need a secure and stable solution from us and we have requested from the cloud provider to give us this level of service.

It's much more stable. It's good. We haven't had any downtime during the past two years. The solution has gone down maybe once.

SQL Server is stable.

I have found the SQL Server stable.

It's stable. It was very easy for me to handle it.

It works perfectly. No issues there. 

So, it is a stable product. 

SQL is a highly unstable server - there are patch updates on the Windows server every week, which is why we only use it for non-critical systems. 

It is very stable.

Very good stability with 250-300 users.

The solution is stable. 

SQL Server is highly stable.

This solution is very stable from what we have seen.

Its stability is good.

The stability is great. there are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. Its performance is reliable. 

The solution is stable and the performance is great. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

The solution is stable, I have not had any issue using it.

So far, the stability has been very good. We haven't experienced any crashed or anything of that nature. There are no bugs or glitches. It's reliable and the performance is good.

This particular product is quite stable. We've not had any particular problems. We've had problems with Microsoft Excel recently, but Analysis Services has been quite stable.

It's a stable solution. Stability is one of the most valuable features.

It is stable.

No.

We have never had a stability problem.

This is a stable product. 

I have a very high opinion of the stability of the solution. It is one of the most mature products available.

Thus far, the solution has been quite stable. It doesn't crash or freeze. there aren't bugs or glitches. It works well for us overall and we find it to be reliable.

We did not encounter any issues with stability. None at all.

We're satisfied with the stability.

SQL Server is a stable solution.

Stability can be shaky.

This solution is stable. 

For the needs we had for the client it was sufficient. Whatever we needed to have - whether more server or more virtual server, the performance for the platform wasn't as good as I would like. I'm not entirely satisfied.

It's a stable solution.

The stability of the product is very good. It's reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It does not crash or freeze. It doesn't give us any trouble.

SQL Server is quite stable. And now we are using the Lattice 2017 version. But the most important thing is that the license cost is quite expensive.

The solution is extremely stable. It's got an amazing backup repository system, a fail-safe system for if any type of data should it be lost. It's got a backup system that stores everything on a day-to-day basis or an hourly basis as well. Depending on the backup and storage drive that you're using or the capacity of the server it is installed on or the local machine, you can pretty much back up any type of critical data, any recent data, or any archive-based data relatively fast. You can also pull that data again, based on the system restore and the server restore is fairly quick.

I rate SQL Server a nine out of ten for stability.

The solution has good stability, although my advice is to use the most recent version towards this end, to provide for bug fixes. This will ensure some stability. 

SQL Server has good performance. It is one of the best features.

The stability has been great. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. it's reliable. 

As we have faced problems with the solution in both the past and present, I feel it could be more stable. 

The solution could be more stable

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable in terms of performance.

It's a stable product.

There are no issues with stability that are not within the norm where you deploy new versions. Microsoft is always very close. When we experience any type of glitch, Microsoft handles it and we take care of it.

Over the years, there was one service pack and two cumulative updates that were recalled as problematic ones, but otherwise it is very stable system.

Stability seems very good. I have not seen any issues with this.

There were no stability issues. If the initial configuration is done correctly, there are no issues. If the other servers are connected at remote locations, then the connectivity performance plays a vital role and it should be 10-15 ms for best results.

The stability and performance are good. It doesn't crash or freeze. it's not buggy. there are no glitches. It's pretty reliable. 

We've struggled with the stability of the product. We'd like for it to be more stable and reliable. 

SQL Server is stable. We have more resources that are using it, I am more familiar with SQL Server. I have been using it for a long time. Most of the time it has been stable.

SQL Server is a stable solution.

The solution is stable.

The solution from the 2008 version is stable. I like the defined database and the ease with which it can be used and that enquiries can be made. 

The solution is very stable. there are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. it's excellent.

The solution is extremely stable. We haven't had issues. We don't really experience bugs or glitches and haven't had the system crash on us before.

Overall, SQL Server 2014 is a very stable product and so far I cannot remember major issues that I have encountered. The only item which I can list is application failure during Integration Services debugging, when restarting a process flow. In a number of instances the solutions fails. I have not given this much thought and simply stop and start the debugging service rather than restarting.

The solution is very stable.

The stability of the SQL Server needs improvements.

We haven't had any experiences. The software hasn't been unstable or glitchy in our environment so far.

The solution is stable. There has been a few bugs but all solutions have them at one time or another.

The solution is stable and it has remained so over the years. I've worked in different organizations, such as the banks here in Lagos. Straight off the bat, I've been using Microsoft SQL Server 2000. We currently use Microsoft SQL Server for our ERP needs. How one designs his tables is important. As the team leader, it is my job to ensure that the functioning is as it should be. The application is pretty straightforward. 

Since we can automate most of our tasks, it means that the management is very easy. We can have jobs for our backups. The solution grants us the ability to perform database housekeeping tasks.

For my purposes, I haven't had any issues with stability. I find it to be reliable in terms of performance. It doesn't crash or freeze. There are no bugs or glitches. It's good.

It has been very stable. We had a very good experience with it.

The solution is stable.

The solution is stable. It's reliable. We do not deal with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

After eight years in our company, we have not had any issues with SQL Server from a stability point of view.

The stability of the product is very good. It offers excellent performance. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

It's a stable product.

The product is stable.

SQL Server is stable.

I have the issue of memory support but the solution is stable. 

SQL Server is a stable solution.

SQL Server is a stable system.

The solution is stable. 

SQL Server is a stable solution, but it could be improved.

We have had no issues with stability. It's one of the most stable products.

SQL Server is a stable product.

Since we are working with a lot of clients on many edge cases, we encounter bugs and stability issues once in a while, but these are rare.

No, none.

There were some avoidable issues, primarily due to a lack of scaling in our own design.

SQL Server is stable. However, Microsoft products have a tendency to crash. I would rate it a five out of ten in terms of stability.

SQL Server's performance is fine.

The product is quite stable. there are no bugs or glitches. it doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

We've had some performance issues overall. It's something that's a pain point for us. They need to work on their capabilities in this regard.

The solution is quite stable. It doesn't have issues with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's good.

There were no stability issues.

When using HA (high availability), we experienced some stability issues.

We did not encounter any stability issues.

SQL is stable.

The solution is stable.

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It does not crash or freeze. It's very reliable in terms of performance.

It's a stable product.

The stability of the solution is excellent. We don't run into any issues with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's fairly reliable.

SQL Server is pretty stable.

The stability is good. We don't have any issues with stability or scalability. 

Sometimes , when windows server suddently failed, the database still can be turn on when DB server started.

I have no problems with stability at all, even when they are clustered.

The solution is stable.

The solution is stable and the performance is good.

Yes, I encountered issues only when using the Express editions during the development. SQL Server, generally speaking, is stable also in high transaction environments.

It is stable.

The stability is pretty good. I find it to be reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is good.

Five years ago there were some stability issues but in the current version, the stability is good.

The solution has been really stable in my experience.

The stability is more on the IT side. I have not paid attention to that as I'm outside the SQL Server. My enterprise data warehouse is not on a SQL Server. Once I get the data, I don't know what's happening in that space. It's not my realm anymore. I know they patch a lot. That gives me a hint that the solution has its issues with bugs. I can't really say if it's stable or not, however, I'm leaning towards no.

With the new, big releases, there's quite a lot of work that we have to do. From 2005 to 2008, and then from 2012 to 2016. But, otherwise, it's quite stable. It's nice.

No.

Running long and complicated queries could make the software crash. You should run them part by part instead (i.e. with stored procedures).

SQL Server is stable.

The solution is stable. 

We have had no issues with stability.

It is stable.

The solution is very stable. 

It's a stable solution. It's very stable.

It is pretty stable.

No stability issues.

No stability issues.

One stability issue I encountered was the deadlocking between calls to the same resources (tables, etc.). That was solved by row versioning. (We were shooting ourselves in the feet).

SQL Server is stable.

I think it's scalable.

The SQL Server has a big issue when some systems use Java as a primary software interface. This database loses the ability to manage memory, consequently locking the processes and losing performance in the execution of some robust queries.

N/A

The solution is stable.

I have found SQL Server stable.

The solution is very stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We're happy with it.

I have found the stability great.

The solution is stable.

no

SQL Server is a stable solution.

It is stable.

Never had issues with stability, may be we were handling structured data well.

It was average.

In the past, it wasn't stable compared to other products like Oracle Db2, but it has improved, and now it's stable. 

The stability of the solution is quite good. We don't have issues with it. It doesn't crash or freeze. We don't experience bugs or glitches. It's reliable.

There were no issues with stability.

The solution is stable and reliable.

Its stability is okay.

We have had no issues with stability.

No issues with stability.

Sometimes the cross-database performance isn't the best.

We had a stability issue with the SSRS component when we deployed it into the production environment.

The solution could be more stable.

If there is flapping of Always-On database node, SQL Server will break the replication to the child nodes, and it requires manual intervention to restart replication.

It's a stable solution. We have no issues with the stability.

I have never had a problem with the stability of the solution. 

This is a stable product.

Not in this version.