In terms of stability, SSIS is reliable and easy to use compared to other solutions.

It is a very stable solution. We have been creating a solution in SSIS, deploying it into the server, and scheduling it using SQL Server jobs. All the jobs have been running easily and quickly for the last ten years.

Very mature and stable, and already has great performance features.

It is quite a stable product. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. It is reliable. I'd rate it a three or four out of five in terms of stability.

We use this solution with Visual Studio. Sometimes we open certain files without making changes, and it saves the changes. In Visual Studio, while we're using TFS, it is easy to backtrack the changes, and we can undo them. However, those changes are pushed to another server if we are not alert and in a hurry.

This is a very stable and dependable solution.

It is quite stable. It's safe and reliable. A lot of organizations are using it instead of Azure Cloud.

The tool's stability is okay. Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The performance is very good. It makes it easier to do things that you would have to do differently otherwise.

I'd rate the overall stability eight out of ten. We haven't had any stability issues in many years. 

It is a stable product. I would rate the stability an eight out of ten. 

I don't believe SSIS is a major development focus for Microsoft right now. Performance enhancements are always a concern.

I would rate the stability of SSIS at a solid nine out of ten. While there may be occasional encounters with bugs or performance issues, personally, we haven't faced significant problems in our usage. 

SSIS is stable.

The solution is stable. The performance is good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

The SSIS is highly stable, but there are occasional issues with the script component.

SSIS is stable. 

SSIS is stable.

I have found the stability to be acceptable.

The solution is stable. We haven't had any issues with that. If we need more processing power, we can increase the resources of the machines below it. 

SSIS is stable, but extensive ETL data processing can have some performance issues.

SSIS is stable.

The solution is stable and reliable. The performance is good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. For us, it's worked quite well.

SSIS is stable.

It's very stable and reliable. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is fine. 

The solution is pretty mature.

I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.

SSIS is quite stable.

The solution is stable. 

It's a stable solution.

I would say it's both reliable and stable. It's been on the market for 20 years, so it's a very mature product.

The solution is stable.

The stability is very good and I recommend it to my friends, my coworkers, and the other companies.

The stability of the solution is perfect.

SSIS is a stable solution.

SSIS is a stable product, but the problem is with the UI you use to build things. If you have it deployed on a virtual machine, everything crashes sometimes. That's one of the significant problems we face with Microsoft products.

SSIS' stability is fairly good, but there's room for improvement.

I've been using it for last 7 years in different projects for different banks. Didn't face any stability issues yet.

The stability of the solution is impressive.

The solution is currently running in production. It's stable.

Again it failed a lot and by a lot I mean every day. The failures were false alarms and caused many sleepless night for our company that I used to work for.

If you run SSIS from the local system, it will lag, but it will work properly if you host on the cloud somewhere. It's a headache every time you run this locally.

The solution is quite stable.

I use this product extensively, on a daily basis. It is stable.

Over time, I think we'll most likely start to decrease usage. This will happen as we move to more real-time processing, and we will most likely start to do more queue processing. In terms of batch processing, it will scale down considerably.

We have not experienced any behavioural differences with the operations of the solution, it is stable.

The solution is quite stable. I don't think we've had any issues.

The solution is stable, as long as you provide good infrastructure for the servers you're dealing with. That means making sure the SQL will be very stable as well as the SAN storage, the RAM, the CPU, and other components of the server. It is quite important.

This is a stable solution.

The stability is very good. I've been using it for a long time. If you know how to use it then it works fairly well.

The stability is good.

We have a stability problem because when something works, it works one time. The next time, it doesn't work. We don't know what is causing that problem. 

This solution is stable, but the performance is not good. I believe it can be improved. Informatica is better.

There were no stability issues.

The solution is stable.

It is stable. 

It is stable.

The stability is okay. It is easy to support.