Statseeker Scalability
JH
Jessie Hackney
Network Engineer at West Virginia Department of Education
The product scales very well. With a one gig connection we can do something like a million interfaces, so that works out well for us. With a very small server, we virtualized it and we can monitor a lot — everything we have and a lot more.
View full review »On our small network, there haven’t been any scalability issues. We're using 1,000 interfaces, and we're probably only monitoring 800 of them. On the other network that I was on before, it was much, much larger, and I also didn't observe any stability issues. Statseeker is a very robust solution. I can't say anything negative about it.
View full review »JE
John Elhariry
Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
If you pay for more licenses, then you can scale it easily. Around 20 users are using this solution.
I rate the solution’s scalability an eight out of ten.
Buyer's Guide
Statseeker
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Statseeker. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
767,496 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RP
Robert Pettit
Senior Network Engineer at Banner Health
This is a very scalable product that we could make even more use of. It could, for example, monitor all of our wireless access points, but we don't use it for that. Potentially, we would be overwhelmed with this much information. We use this solution mostly for switches, routers, and controllers.
View full review »RM
Roy Mccauley
Lead Network Engineer at Fairview Health Services
With respect to the scalability of this solution, I find that it is good.
View full review »TM
Troy Mellon
Network Engineer at Banner Health
It tends to be very scalable, I don't have any problems at all. We have thousands of devices on it and we can easily add more.
View full review »JB
Jp Buckley
Senior Network Engineer at Unum Group
It does scale well. You have to pay for your account, but I had no issues. We've used this tool for probably eight years, maybe ten.
The scalability of the solution helped us to implement SDN. It's going to take probably until next year. We have too many other projects going on right now.
We have multiple data centers and multiple campus locations. We have dual wire carriers. We can see transmit coming in, receipt coming out.
I have Statseeker set up for routing. I can see when the interface goes down. Then the traffic flow over onto the other router. It's nice to have that.
View full review »BW
NetworkA3000
Network Analyst at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Its scalability is great. The only limitation that we've ran into is the licensing with the number of interfaces that we're licensed for. But we run it on some fairly old server hardware, and it works just fine. That's with 30,000 interfaces.
It's a fairly easy product to support. We just install it and it kind of runs. So we haven't really had to spend much time with care and feeding other than trying to upgrade it manually.
View full review »MF
Matthew Freitag
Network Engineer at Michigan Technological University
We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all. The scalability is awesome.
View full review »SS
Scott Steves
Network Engineer at BCBS of KS
The scalability of this solution is very good.
View full review »CM
Charles Moore
Senior IT Director at Inglis foundation
Statseeker would scale just fine. I just don't need it for more than what I have it for. It would scale great. It's fast, light, and thin.
We've done some WAN stuff, but are just getting into SDN.
View full review »LJ
Lance Jeffery
Senior Network Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We have not had any scalability issues. It has been able to successfully handle all the devices and information we have thrown at it.
View full review »CS
NetworkA0c11
Network Analyst at a leisure / travel company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The scalability is adequate.
View full review »LR
NetworkTe9f1
Network Team Lead at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Scalability is very good.
View full review »GS
NetworkSbfc0
Network Security Engineer at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
We're a pretty large organization and it scales great with us.
View full review »DD
Dan Davis
Network Engineer-OCIO at a university with 10,001+ employees
There weren't really any issues with scalability.
View full review »MP
NetworkE1530
Network Engineer at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees
The solution has very good scalability.
View full review »DH
Daniel Hess
Network Specialist at Internal Revenue Service
The scalability seems to be pretty good.
View full review »Not at all, it's one of the best tools I have. It's so quick I could run reports in a matter of seconds, whereas with some of the other systems they take minutes. Sometimes they time out. With Statseeker, I could do the last year's reports in a couple of minutes. Very happy with it.
View full review »CJ
NetworkTddd4
Network Tools Specialist at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
At least in our deployment, I wouldn't say we've had any scalability issues as of yet. For our environment it seems to be okay.
View full review »MN
SeniorEn789c
Senior Engineer at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The scalability is good.
View full review »JR
SrManage3688
Sr Manager at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Scalability is horrible. The more stuff we add to Statseeker the more we have to sift through with a horrible interface. It doesn't scale well.
AP
NetworkE6e63
Network Engineer at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees
I do not feel that this solution is very scalable. It is sometimes hard to drill down and find specific interfaces that you need to track.
View full review »Not so far, we have around 2500 mainly Cisco devices in our current version and have not had any issues so far.
View full review »A single server can handle hundreds of thousands of interfaces.
View full review »No issues with scalability.
View full review »JT
NetworkE824e
Network Engineer at a university with 10,001+ employees
Scalability has been fine for us, thus far.
View full review »WM
Willis Morris
Senior Network Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
It's a very scalable solution. We've used it with most of our network equipment monitoring and we haven't had any performance issues or any other problems.
View full review »DL
Darrick Lutz
Systems Analyst at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
We have not yet encountered any issues with scalability. We’re still a small customer and I only monitor 20,000 or so interfaces.
View full review »No issues with scalability.
View full review »We haven’t experienced any scalability issues, but that may be because we’re a relatively small organisation (less than 150 devices being monitored).
View full review »TT
Solutioneddb
Solution Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Scalability-wise, it's a monitoring platform so it's pulling these devices via SNMP. I would say if I needed an additional service to take on the workload then I would just provide additional storage. It's very simple to install.
View full review »SL
NetworkA34f6
Network Analayst
I haven't encountered any scalability issues. Generating a large report is so quick.
View full review »MB
CTOd177
CTO at a tech services company
The scalability of this solution is good.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Statseeker
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Statseeker. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
767,496 professionals have used our research since 2012.