The product scales very well. With a one gig connection we can do something like a million interfaces, so that works out well for us. With a very small server, we virtualized it and we can monitor a lot — everything we have and a lot more.

On our small network, there haven’t been any scalability issues. We're using 1,000 interfaces, and we're probably only monitoring 800 of them. On the other network that I was on before, it was much, much larger, and I also didn't observe any stability issues. Statseeker is a very robust solution. I can't say anything negative about it.

If you pay for more licenses, then you can scale it easily. Around 20 users are using this solution.

I rate the solution’s scalability an eight out of ten.

This is a very scalable product that we could make even more use of. It could, for example, monitor all of our wireless access points, but we don't use it for that. Potentially, we would be overwhelmed with this much information. We use this solution mostly for switches, routers, and controllers.

With respect to the scalability of this solution, I find that it is good.

It tends to be very scalable, I don't have any problems at all. We have thousands of devices on it and we can easily add more.

It does scale well. You have to pay for your account, but I had no issues. We've used this tool for probably eight years, maybe ten. 

The scalability of the solution helped us to implement SDN. It's going to take probably until next year. We have too many other projects going on right now.

We have multiple data centers and multiple campus locations. We have dual wire carriers. We can see transmit coming in, receipt coming out. 

I have Statseeker set up for routing. I can see when the interface goes down. Then the traffic flow over onto the other router. It's nice to have that.

Its scalability is great. The only limitation that we've ran into is the licensing with the number of interfaces that we're licensed for. But we run it on some fairly old server hardware, and it works just fine. That's with 30,000 interfaces.

It's a fairly easy product to support. We just install it and it kind of runs. So we haven't really had to spend much time with care and feeding other than trying to upgrade it manually.

We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all. The scalability is awesome.

The scalability of this solution is very good.

Statseeker would scale just fine. I just don't need it for more than what I have it for. It would scale great. It's fast, light, and thin. 

We've done some WAN stuff, but are just getting into SDN.

We have not had any scalability issues. It has been able to successfully handle all the devices and information we have thrown at it.

The scalability is adequate.

Scalability is very good.

We're a pretty large organization and it scales great with us.

There weren't really any issues with scalability.

The solution has very good scalability.

The scalability seems to be pretty good.

Not at all, it's one of the best tools I have. It's so quick I could run reports in a matter of seconds, whereas with some of the other systems they take minutes. Sometimes they time out. With Statseeker, I could do the last year's reports in a couple of minutes. Very happy with it.

At least in our deployment, I wouldn't say we've had any scalability issues as of yet. For our environment it seems to be okay.

The scalability is good. 

Scalability is horrible. The more stuff we add to Statseeker the more we have to sift through with a horrible interface. It doesn't scale well.

I do not feel that this solution is very scalable. It is sometimes hard to drill down and find specific interfaces that you need to track.

Not so far, we have around 2500 mainly Cisco devices in our current version and have not had any issues so far.

A single server can handle hundreds of thousands of interfaces.

No issues with scalability.

Scalability has been fine for us, thus far.

It's a very scalable solution. We've used it with most of our network equipment monitoring and we haven't had any performance issues or any other problems.

We have not yet encountered any issues with scalability. We’re still a small customer and I only monitor 20,000 or so interfaces.

No issues with scalability.

We haven’t experienced any scalability issues, but that may be because we’re a relatively small organisation (less than 150 devices being monitored).

Scalability-wise, it's a monitoring platform so it's pulling these devices via SNMP. I would say if I needed an additional service to take on the workload then I would just provide additional storage. It's very simple to install.

I haven't encountered any scalability issues. Generating a large report is so quick.

The scalability of this solution is good.