Stonebranch Universal Automation Center Pros and Cons

Stonebranch Universal Automation Center Pros

Brian
Sr. System Programmer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
I can name the aliases on the agent, so if we need a passive environment for an agent, that's one of the nice features. If our primary goes down, I can bring up the passive one and I don't have to change anything in the scheduling world. It will start running from that new server.
I have found the agents to be so much simpler, when compared to ESP.
View full review »
Earl Diem
Manager Performance and Automation Engineering at PSCU Financial Services
The Universal Agent is the most valuable feature. Being agent-based and being able to go across multiple technology stacks, which is what our workflows do, Stonebranch gives us the ability to bridge those disparate technologies. It enables us to remove the dependency-gap with the agent so we know the status of the workflow at each step.
View full review »
SeniorTe1d8f
Senior Technical Analyst at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
We lean a lot on the multi-tenancy that they offer within the product, the ability to get other people to self-manage their estate, versus having a central team do all the scheduling.
When it comes to agent technology and compatibility with other vendors, from a platform perspective it was the one vendor that fit all the platforms that we have, from your old platforms - mainframe, NSK, IBM i - to the new ones, going into cloud and container
View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Stonebranch Universal Automation Center. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2020.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Frank Burkhardt
Application and Database Administrator at Blue Bird
The tasks are incredibly capable, and as long as you name them with a nice, uniform naming convention, they are very useful. You can create some interesting workflows through various machines, or you can just have it kick off single tasks. All in all, I really like the Universal Task. You can do some mutually exclusive stuff, such as an "A not B" kind of thing. It has a lot of capabilities behind the scenes.
View full review »
Mike Booher
Systems Programmer II at a insurance company with 501-1,000 employees
The ability to monitor tasks that are on the open-system side as well as our mainframe side gives us a one-window view of all our processes.
I love the Universal Controller. It's been great for us. We host it on-premise... It's High Availability, meaning there's failover from one server to the other if one goes down.
View full review »
Doug Perseghetti
Consulting Systems Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
The most valuable feature is the reliability of the agents, because we need them accessible and we need to run stuff. The agent technology and compatibility are top-notch.
View full review »
reviewer958518
Architect & Technical Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The interface is very user-friendly and easy to navigate.
View full review »

Stonebranch Universal Automation Center Cons

Brian
Sr. System Programmer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
One hiccup we've had is due to the fact that we have other internal scheduling tools. We're able to talk to them, but we have trouble with some of the networking between them, so we're still trying to work out the kinks there.
View full review »
Earl Diem
Manager Performance and Automation Engineering at PSCU Financial Services
Occasionally, we have an agent that doesn't come back up after patching. That doesn't happen very often... It's really just a restart of the agent and it comes back up. But that might be one thing that could be improved.
View full review »
SeniorTe1d8f
Senior Technical Analyst at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
There is a component called the OMS, which is the message broker. We rely on infrastructure, resiliency, and availability for that piece. If that could change to be highly available just as a software component, so that we don't have to provide the high-available storage, etc. for it, that would be a plus. It would just be cheaper to run.
View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Stonebranch Universal Automation Center. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2020.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Frank Burkhardt
Application and Database Administrator at Blue Bird
There is room for improvement with its connectivity with the Microsoft SRS system. It is very weak. They keep telling us it works with it, and technically it does, but it does not provide a lot of visibility. We have lost a lot of visibility migrating to Stonebranch, compared with just running tasks on the SRS server. That's really about the only thing that is a sore point for us.
View full review »
Mike Booher
Systems Programmer II at a insurance company with 501-1,000 employees
I have a request regarding our agent on the mainframe. It may time out when communicating to the Universal Controller, when the mainframe is extremely busy. That can cause a task which is running at that time to not see the results of the job that ran on the mainframe. It happens sporadically during times of really busy CPU usage. We're expecting that enhancement from them in the fourth quarter.
View full review »
Doug Perseghetti
Consulting Systems Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
The Universal Controller is decent for the money it costs... It needs some work to have full features, compared to other products that are out there, specifically IBM's Workload Scheduler.
View full review »
reviewer958518
Architect & Technical Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
It would be ideal if they had the exact same features as the CA Workload Automation DE series. It would be helpful to have calendaring options.
View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Stonebranch Universal Automation Center. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2020.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.