I would recommend knowing your data so you can understand if there's an issue and get alerts. Also, make sure to publish it for your APIs or web anytime so you can understand what's going on.

Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten. 

Its effectiveness depends on your specific requirements. If your website is based on WordPress, it is a great fit, as it's optimized for WordPress services and works exceptionally well in that context. When it comes to non-WordPress websites or more general web applications, it may not be the best choice. Overall, I would rate it seven out of ten.

I recommend that you carefully consider whether the provider offers a black box tool that can detect best practices for development. An implemented site can help to prevent further infection or risk.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

In terms of overall functionality, it's good to go with. It offers various types of functionalities that are not generally provided by many established organizations. For example, for AWS, private security, it's a good choice.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. Sucuri is a good option for website protection and prevention. It's a good choice if someone wants to implement it, and it's also easy to understand and use.

For people who own a personal website, this solution is worth trying out since their security solution is somewhat full-fledged. It will help you sleep at night. For corporations, if you have some business process that requires automated scanning of a lot of domain names and alerting the relevant parties (like us), then it’s worth considering.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. The reason is that we have found sometimes customers or Google saying that there is something wrong with the website but Sucuri says that the site is clean so we do have to look at the site manually which means that the Sucuri scan does not pick up anything and everything.