Endpoint Security is stable.

It's very stable. I have never experienced an unstable system with Symantec.

Symantec is relatively stable, but it's an on-premises solution, so we need to spend more time on version upgrades and patches. We have encountered some major bugs, which cause DSOD on all our machines during updates.

The product is stable. 

Symantec is stable. 

It is stable, and that's why I recommend Symantec, especially when it comes to the server environment.

We follow the N-1 process. Whenever there is a new version, we don't upgrade immediately because there can be potential risks. We upgrade to a new version immediately only if we get the recommendation from the vendor or they have fixed any vulnerability or issue that was reported. Otherwise, we follow the N-1 version approach for upgrades.

They have been a leader for the last couple of years. There is no question about its productivity. It is a good name in the market. Every six and seven months, they are adding a new component or feature. If they see any gap in the product, they fix it. 

This is a very stable product. It is the feature that I like most about the product because when we were using other ones, we had failures. With this solution, there is no frequent failure of the components.

For example, in other products that we've used, the virus definitions didn't update and systems were compromised because of it.

We haven't had any issues with SEP. We have been using it for quite a long time, and it has been stable. It is reliable. We are getting upgrade patches. 

We are also using other Symantec solutions, such as Blue Coat, and we have had issues with them but not with SEP.

It is very stable. Even the customers don't really complain compared to other solutions. 

Endpoint Security is stable. 

It's very reliable. It's very steady and doesn't give us issues.

We don't have any issues with respect to its performance, in general. I rate the stability at nine out of 10.

The solution is mostly stable, however, when we need to upgrade, at this moment we need help due to the fact that we don't have good technical support locally. 

We have been using older versions, as they are stable versions for us and we don't know how to upgrade completely to the latest version. That is the issue that we have at this moment. We need to be trained, however, we don't have any access to training, especially from Symantec. For the last two years, and it is hard.

I rate Symantec Endpoint Security an eight out of ten for stability.

We haven't had any issues when updating it.

It's stable.

It is good. We don't have to worry much about bugs. We had a bug only once where we had not allowed for automatic upgrades, but it was upgrading. From the perspective of bugs, Symantec is fine.

Its stability is excellent. It is very stable.

The stability is very good. It's reliable. It doesn't crash or freeze. There are no bugs or glitches. It's quite good.

Symantec Endpoint Security is stable.

The stability was not the best. There were times when antivirus updates broke it. It wasn't necessarily self-updating - at least, not in terms of the virus signatures. It updated in terms of the executable files. Therefore, when Windows updates would come out, they often couldn't be installed, or the computer would hang due to the fact that the updates weren't compatible with the antivirus. I give it pretty poor score for robustness.

The solution is stable.

The solution is very stable. 

While we've had issues with stability in the past, since version 14.2 it hasn't been a problem. We no longer have issues.

I rate the platform’s stability an eight out of ten.

It's a stable solution.

With Windows 7 there were some stability issues. The environment handled resources differently. You could have a fairly resource-heavy solution that would make the system unusable.

Windows 10 improved stability quite a bit.

I've seen way too many outages and "maintenance" events in the last year on the new platform to consider it stable.

Symantec Endpoint Protection is stable product, if you compare it other vendors, like McAfee or Trend Micro. McAfee was acquired by the Intel, who is very not strong in security patterns.

Our German team manages the maintenance.

It is average in terms of stability. It works fine, but when we do the upgrades, there are stability issues.

Its stability is good. It is reliable.

The product is very stable.

This product is stable. We've been using it for 10 years, and I can say that it has been stable. 

Basically, once the product is installed on the server, there is no maintenance to do. Maybe there are some updates, moving from a lower to a higher version, but this is the main maintenance that people do. 

For the most part, the stability is okay. 

It's stable, but this could be due to our surroundings. There is only enough storage to store it. And I believe it is due to us, rather than the product, that we only store a limited amount of data.

The solution is very stable. We have no complaints. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

It is completely stable. There are no issues. I don't find it slowing my laptop. I don't know if my laptop is powerful or the application doesn't take too many resources. A few years ago, the antivirus was slowing down computers and laptops, but now, I don't feel any such issue.

This is a very stable solution. 

It's a stable product, very robust.

The solution is not stable.

It is stable.

Symantec Endpoint Security is stable and easy to use.

Stability has been fair. There have been some issues with the CPU utilization on some of the endpoints. A little bit of a resource hog, but we've been able to work through it for the most part.

It is a stable product.

Stability-wise, this solution is average. Because it's not cloud-based, where it's being updated continuously, there are times when it displays something on all the workstations and disables the workstations. We then would have to call the consultant to come in and apply some updates.

It is stable. We do not really have problems with the product crashing.  

From a usage point, it's very stable. With the new company Broadcom, that's taken them over, I know they've had some shakeups. My concern is whether or not Broadcom continues to support it going forward. If they do I'm fine with it. If they don't or they start having failures in their support, then I'm going to have to leave them.

It is very stable. I do not have any problems with it at all. 

It is a stable solution.

The stability has been very good. We haven't had any issues in that respect. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. Its performance is very reliable.

The stability is good.

The solution is stable. 

It is stable. I don't have any issues.

It is a product that is simple and is working fine.

There were no stability issues.

Symantec is stable.

The solution is very stable.

I have been using Symantec since 2007. I didn't have any issues regarding even the updates and the migration to the new version. I didn't have any problems, but with the other vendors, I found a lot of problems.

On Windows, this is very fine and perfect, but for the Linux it needs improvement. Whenever I install it on Linux, I found a lot of problems. Even on the Mac as well. 

Kaspersky has Android support as well, but in Symantec, they still don't have support for Android. You should have Mac and Android device support too. 

The Endpoint solution should have support for all types of devices. Symantec has only Windows support (which is the very best), but for the Mac, I found some errors.

It should improve Mac and Android support like Windows device support. The protection of Windows level support is very tight and strong.

The stability is great.

The stability is fine.

We haven't had any problems with it.

This solution is very stable. It is "install and forget".

Once you install the solution on the server, it is very quick when it comes to updating the clients. Specifically, it sends packages really quickly to all of the clients to ensure that they have the latest build. It is transparent and quick.

This solution is constantly in use. It runs 24/7.

The solution is stable. As a product, it does what it should, but no more. It will fail to detect a new kind of malware that lacks a signature. 

This is a reliable solution.

I have been using the solution for a long while, it has been stable.

It has been around a while but I don't think it has successfully made the jump into next-generation features, like a lot of its competitors have.

The solution is stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is reliable. 

The solution is stable. 

It is stable.

The solution is stable.

I cannot say the stability is excellent, but it is very good.

We have no issues with the stability of Symantec End-User Endpoint Security.

I have found Symantec End-User Endpoint Security to be stable.

The time frame for the implementation all depends on the number of users, the number of licenses that have been purchased by the company. The typical time frame is three to four days.

I've had no issues with stability in the ten years that I have been using it.

This product is being pushed the maximum, and we are using it every day.

It is stable, and once you put in the policies, it does what it is supposed to do.

The solution is one hundred percent stable.

It's not very stable I don't think. I'll didn't have any problems when it did not work, or episodes of crashing or anything but yeah, it's not very stable.

We don't do daily scans, we do weekly scans but it is used daily and obviously, it's got a real-time scan so it's in constant use.

There were issues, and they should ensure that the product updates automatically, especially in the DMZ.

It is very stable.

Stability is good.

The Symantec agent is bulky in comparison to various vendors. It creates stability issues. We need a supported utility to wipe clear Symantec for a fresh installation during troubleshooting.

I did not encounter any issues with stability.

Symantec End-User Endpoint Security is a stable solution.

The solution is stable.

We've never had issues with stability. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The stability is quite good and it's very reliable.

Is it stable product, no issues so far.

Symantec End-User Endpoint Security is stable.

The big issues around stability were fixed back around 2010 or so. When the original SEP client was created, there were some challenges with the interoperability of the different components, because they took a number of different agents, put them into one agent, and then they broke things. With SEP 12 and forward, that all runs really well now.

It is not stable in terms of the company. They have already been bought many times. A lot of people are changing brands because of the acquisition of Broadcom. So, it is not much stable.

The solution is very stable. The majority of the users are end users. Other than that we have IT staff that use it, so we have approximately three thousand users.

Stability issues are very rare. It's a very stable product.

Stability-wise, it is very good and we have had no trouble.

I find the solution stable.

It is stable.

We haven’t had stability issues. After finishing the product, customizing it worked as expected.

It has been stable so far.

There are no issues in rolling it out. Rather, it's more in reporting.

One time we had an issue with knowing a true endpoint time and the reporting. There was a conflict with what was in the console. I think that it was a glitch in verifying the device count.

The new version is not very stable with the latest version of Windows 10. We got a lot of crashes with this solution. 

We have about 1000 users.

The stability is great. I have no issues.

The system is very stable.

Random issues with the apps. The built in firewall is tricky sometimes to get an app working in it.

No. After finishing the product customizations, it worked as expected.

The client agent is not stable. I have to keep fixing it on four to five percent.

We have experienced a few stability issues in 10 years.

No.

Not yet.

Stability is dependent on environment. It may not always be stable, because of environment. For example, there could be an issue in some environment, but in another environment there would not be an issue.

The tool is stable.