Symantec is one of the major players in that space, so the licensing isn't as cheap as some other antivirus products like Trend Micro. It's reasonable but not the cheapest. Any entry-level Symantec user is coughing up a lot of money compared to the other antivirus software. 

Windows Defender is practically free for customers. When you have the option of using Microsoft Defender, and you look at the price of Symantec, the gap is wide. Trend Micro is a bit closer, so competitive pricing is something Symantec may also need to consider. 

The price of Symantec is very good compared to other vendors. I had access to information about pricing when we were renewing. I don't know if the renewal was cheaper than when contracting it the first time, but the renewal price was better than many other vendors' first-time prices.

I thought the pricing was reasonable.

I was not involved in the negotiations, but I believe the price was within the range we expect for endpoint protection.

The solution could be cheaper. 

The price of Symantec is reasonable compared to other solutions. 

Pricing is handled by a separate team. Whenever a new client asks for a recommendation, we provide it, but they deal directly with Symantec or other vendors for the pricing.

It is normal. If you are an educational institute, they give you a very good discount. If you are coming from the banking side, they may or may not give you a discount. I'm working with seven companies, and normally, they get a 65% to 70% discount on everything.

There are various components. You have to know what exactly you want. If you are just going to protect your endpoint, you won't buy Symantec Endpoint Security Complete. You would buy the Endpoint Enterprise, which is on the lower side. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is on the higher side because you can also manage your mobiles and other devices. EDR is also a part of it, whereas, with the enterprise version, you don't get EDR. Overall, the price depends on the number of security components you want.

The pricing was one of the factors that led us to choose this product.

That said, I was not the decision maker. I simply proposed it to our manager.

The pricing is as per the environment. If all the features are there, there will be a cost for them. There were no additional costs for me. Support and other things were included in the pricing.

The price of Symantec is on the higher end. They face some competition from a company called Quick Heal, which is much cheaper than Endpoint Security. They offer three years of protection at just 900 rupees.

The pricing is good, very moderate, and the licensing is also good. It gives you more room to install a lot of endpoints and it even gives you the opportunity to install it on your mobile phone without any extra cost.

The one issue we have is that whenever we buy a license, it takes us to a new tenant. We communicate with our local partners and they give us the license key. Then, we have to go to the portal and apply it, but sometimes it doesn't work. We then have to create a new administrative account and migrate all our endpoints. That is the only major issue we have been battling with. Apart from that, it's fine.

The pricing is pretty much at the market standard. I don't see any issues with it. It depends on case to case. Symantec is not that cheap and it's not that expensive compared to CrowdStrike. I would put them in the "middle block."

Symantec Endpoint Security is a moderately priced solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten.

I don't have any insights into the pricing or licensing aspects of the product.

It's pretty awesome price-wise. That's why we give it to most of our clients. It isn't very expensive.

Compared to Cisco AMP, which is very expensive, its price is okay. It's also cheaper than Malwarebytes.

The license that you purchase lasts a period of time. After that, you again need to purchase another license. Otherwise, you will not be able to get support from Symantec every time you have issues.

Its price is fair.

I am not sure of the initial cost, but the yearly renewals are quite affordable, which is a good thing. The price seems to have come down in recent years, and with the alternatives that are out there, such as Microsoft Defender, it needs to maintain that affordability to make it attractive.

We pay a yearly licensing fee. The fee was paid last year, however, I don't have access to the exact costs. It may have been renewed before I started working with the company.

We pay on a yearly basis. However, I'm unsure of the exact amount.

The license for this solution is purchased on an annual bases. The price could be cheaper but it's not too bad. We also pay for technical support which we get locally here in Serbia.

We need licenses to use the product, however, the pricing is reasonable. It's not too expensive.

I rate the product's pricing a six out of ten.

Symantec is expensive. 

When compared with Trend Micro and Sophos, it is expensive.

Customers are required to purchase a license.

This product is more reasonably priced than some competing solutions.

Each annual client license is around 1200 or 1600 INR.

Zero-day threat or advanced attacks should be part of the endpoint. The product should not require you to buy a separate license.

They have increased the products of these products recently without any notice. This hasn't gone over well with small clients.

One great benefit is we do not need to activate a license for every endpoint. The price is fair.

Because we are still awaiting pricing, I am not sure what the difference is. I have only done the technical comparison; I haven't done the pricing comparison yet.

The pricing is decent. It falls within an acceptable range. However, if the goal is to draw more clients, it could be a bit less expensive. 

My understanding is that the price is quite good and competitive. My advise is to invest the necessary time and effort to deploy it correctly and with minimal disruption. In the enterprise arena, if you don't have the in-house expertise in the more complex areas of the product do your organization a favor and get expert assistance.

When it comes to pricing, Sophos is preferable to Symantec. It provides a cloud-based dashboard which affords control and an easy centralized management system. This is of considerable benefit and explains why we have decided to go with Sophos. 

It is cheap. It is especially cheaper than Malwarebytes, which is three times higher than this. It is also cheaper than Cisco. Its price is almost similar to Bitdefender, Gravity, and CloudZone. 

Symantec Endpoint Security does have some aggressive competitors and they're offering very competitive pricing. Maybe Symantec Endpoint Security could amend their pricing structure, but they always offer a good product.

We usually go on a per-seat basis, and it's usually yearly. The prices fluctuate, but this year I think it was maybe around $12,000. If you're looking at the on-prem costs for the virtual server and the licensing for the server, that would be the only extra cost.

What we have paid for this product is good value for the work and the services that they are providing to us.

The licensing costs are huge compared to what is normally included in the licensing with other products such as the Microsoft products that we're using. We're paying between $300 and $400 per seat.

We're a not-for-profit. We do get exceptionally good pricing, however, I cannot say exactly what the costs are for us on a monthly or yearly basis.

The price of the product is competitive if compared to its competitors in the market.

It's affordable.

We haven't compared the pricing with other solutions. When our license renewal arrives we will look at our needs and we will evaluate every option possible so that we can choose the right one.

The licensing terms can range from subscription-based to perpetual, to annual, to tri-annual. 

Its price is reasonable.

The most important criteria for us is the price and the licensing. 

Symantec End-User is not expensive.

Compared to other products and brands here in Mexico, the price is okay, somewhere in the middle. Our solution is unique in that it can adapt to a variety of pricing and licensing constraints considering we have the corporate, government, and academic mandates. The account managers here in Mexico always give us support in the form of applicable discounts and adjustments.

This is not the cheapest product and I know others that are most cost-effective, although it is difficult to compare because it depends on the features.

We receive a discounted price for this solution because we are a non-profit organization. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.

There is a yearly license. 

Licensing is based on a yearly subscription.

There are subscription costs, we typically purchase the annual subscription. There can be other expenses too, for example, we use CrowdStrike also as part of our policy.

I cannot speak to the exact licensing costs. We recommend the solution to our clients, however, they buy the license from the vendor directly.

We had some issues with licensing registration on the company website. We pay on an annual basis and it's a fair price. 

The licensing is calculated on a monthly basis, but we use a three-year renewal. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.

Pricing and licensing for our country is very good. It's not that expensive and the endpoint security is very good. It's not as cheap as some others, but they are not as good.

It could be cheaper.

We have some customers on a one-year license and others on a three-year license.

Considering the features, the price of this solution is average. We pay our licensing fees on a yearly basis, and everything is included in that price. Whether it is via email or phone call, they do what needs to be done.

I am unaware of pricing.

We pay on a yearly basis and have a three-year contract.

I never dealt in purchases, so I have no input.

I’d say SEP deserves the money.

Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.

The price could be lower.

The price of the solution could be less expensive.

The solution needs better licensing options.

The price of Symantec End-User Endpoint Security is okay. When comparing the price of this solution is not expensive.

From a simplicity perspective, it's per user. Therefore, it makes it easy to do licensing.

I'll be honest, I haven't really done licensing with Symantec for seven years. I just do professional services and we let our partners handle the licensing.

They're on the reasonable side. They are at mid-level. They're not too expensive as compared to their competitors. They're also not too cheap. In terms of price structure, hopefully, they could do a subscription.

When comparing this solution to others in the current market it is expensive.

The EDR options are costlier than other products.

We were using some traditional licensing. Our company is a nonprofit, so we have a different price pricing model.

This solution is more costly than some competing solutions.

Migrating a platform for a different one, most of the time, has a higher cost. However, considering the impact, risk , downtime, and principally, the low support quality provided that the oldest solution provided, were the main reason to start look forward for a newer one. These were the main reason that I migrated to Symantec. After a year of augmenting many open tickets and find internal customer satisfaction was really low, we convinced the board that it was time to migrate before having a huge impact for the business and company reputation.

Regarding the licensing, it was important negotiate a long contract to get a more attractive price, including advanced support in case of crisis.

Its price should be reasonable.

I don't have any idea about pricing and licensing, as they are related to another functional role.

Symantec is a little more expensive, but it works!

It is not cheap. 

Not applicable.

It is the better product, even if it is a little on the higher side.